Cargando…

Comparison of Intraoral and Extraoral Digital Scanners: Evaluation of Surface Topography and Precision

The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface topography and the precision measurements of different intraoral and extraoral digital scanners. A reference model of a maxillary arch with four implant analogs was prepared and scanned by three intraoral and two extraoral scanners. The reference mod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Sang J., Kim, Soo-Woo, Lee, Joshua J., Cheong, Chan W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7344681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32443865
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8020052
_version_ 1783556001292615680
author Lee, Sang J.
Kim, Soo-Woo
Lee, Joshua J.
Cheong, Chan W.
author_facet Lee, Sang J.
Kim, Soo-Woo
Lee, Joshua J.
Cheong, Chan W.
author_sort Lee, Sang J.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface topography and the precision measurements of different intraoral and extraoral digital scanners. A reference model of a maxillary arch with four implant analogs was prepared and scanned by three intraoral and two extraoral scanners. The reference model was scanned fifteen times with each digital scanning system, investigating the surface topography and precision measurements for the same-arch and cross-arch measurements. The data was exported to 3D inspection and mesh-processing software (GOM Inspect, Braunschweig, Germany). Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with the Tukey method for pairwise comparisons. The effect of parameters on generating the surface topography was analyzed by Univariate Linear Regression Analysis. Of the scanner systems evaluated, iTero (IT) exhibited the most number of triangulation points, followed by Trios 3 Shape (TR) and Straumann Cares (SC). There were no significant differences observed in the surface topography when comparing flat and contoured surfaces, the anterior and posterior position, and interproximal areas. For the precision measurement in the same quadrant, no statistical difference was noted between intra- and extraoral scanners. However, the extraoral scanners showed substantially higher precision measurements for the cross-arch measurement. Surface topography did not correlate to precision. Rather, precision correlated with the scanning mechanism. For a quadrant scanning, both intraoral and extraoral scanners are recommended, but extraoral scanners are recommended for a full-arch scanning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7344681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73446812020-07-09 Comparison of Intraoral and Extraoral Digital Scanners: Evaluation of Surface Topography and Precision Lee, Sang J. Kim, Soo-Woo Lee, Joshua J. Cheong, Chan W. Dent J (Basel) Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface topography and the precision measurements of different intraoral and extraoral digital scanners. A reference model of a maxillary arch with four implant analogs was prepared and scanned by three intraoral and two extraoral scanners. The reference model was scanned fifteen times with each digital scanning system, investigating the surface topography and precision measurements for the same-arch and cross-arch measurements. The data was exported to 3D inspection and mesh-processing software (GOM Inspect, Braunschweig, Germany). Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with the Tukey method for pairwise comparisons. The effect of parameters on generating the surface topography was analyzed by Univariate Linear Regression Analysis. Of the scanner systems evaluated, iTero (IT) exhibited the most number of triangulation points, followed by Trios 3 Shape (TR) and Straumann Cares (SC). There were no significant differences observed in the surface topography when comparing flat and contoured surfaces, the anterior and posterior position, and interproximal areas. For the precision measurement in the same quadrant, no statistical difference was noted between intra- and extraoral scanners. However, the extraoral scanners showed substantially higher precision measurements for the cross-arch measurement. Surface topography did not correlate to precision. Rather, precision correlated with the scanning mechanism. For a quadrant scanning, both intraoral and extraoral scanners are recommended, but extraoral scanners are recommended for a full-arch scanning. MDPI 2020-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7344681/ /pubmed/32443865 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8020052 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Sang J.
Kim, Soo-Woo
Lee, Joshua J.
Cheong, Chan W.
Comparison of Intraoral and Extraoral Digital Scanners: Evaluation of Surface Topography and Precision
title Comparison of Intraoral and Extraoral Digital Scanners: Evaluation of Surface Topography and Precision
title_full Comparison of Intraoral and Extraoral Digital Scanners: Evaluation of Surface Topography and Precision
title_fullStr Comparison of Intraoral and Extraoral Digital Scanners: Evaluation of Surface Topography and Precision
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Intraoral and Extraoral Digital Scanners: Evaluation of Surface Topography and Precision
title_short Comparison of Intraoral and Extraoral Digital Scanners: Evaluation of Surface Topography and Precision
title_sort comparison of intraoral and extraoral digital scanners: evaluation of surface topography and precision
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7344681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32443865
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8020052
work_keys_str_mv AT leesangj comparisonofintraoralandextraoraldigitalscannersevaluationofsurfacetopographyandprecision
AT kimsoowoo comparisonofintraoralandextraoraldigitalscannersevaluationofsurfacetopographyandprecision
AT leejoshuaj comparisonofintraoralandextraoraldigitalscannersevaluationofsurfacetopographyandprecision
AT cheongchanw comparisonofintraoralandextraoraldigitalscannersevaluationofsurfacetopographyandprecision