Cargando…
Validating the Use of Corifollitropin Alfa in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol on Normal and High Responders by Comparing with Conventional Antagonist Protocol: A Retrospective Study
Our previous study showed a satisfactory reproductive outcome resulting from the patient-friendly ovarian stimulation protocol using long-acting follicle stimulation hormone (FSH) plus oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA). The present retrospective study aims to compare the efficacy of the patient...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7344689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32575849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life10060090 |
_version_ | 1783556003166420992 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Chen-Yu Chen, Guan-Yeu Shieh, Miawh-Lirng Li, Hsin-Yang |
author_facet | Huang, Chen-Yu Chen, Guan-Yeu Shieh, Miawh-Lirng Li, Hsin-Yang |
author_sort | Huang, Chen-Yu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Our previous study showed a satisfactory reproductive outcome resulting from the patient-friendly ovarian stimulation protocol using long-acting follicle stimulation hormone (FSH) plus oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA). The present retrospective study aims to compare the efficacy of the patient-friendly ovarian stimulation protocol with that of the antagonist protocol on normal and high responders aged between 24 and 39 years in a tertiary fertility center in Taiwan. To prevent premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge, oral MPA was given to patients in group 1 (n = 57), whereas antagonist protocol was applied to group 2 (n = 53). Duration and dosage of stimulation, number of injections and visits before trigger, incidence of premature LH surge, number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, cleavage rate, rate of good embryos available, incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, cumulative clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate per retrieval were compared between groups. We conclude that our patient-friendly ovarian stimulation protocol with MPA demonstrates satisfactory stimulation and reproductive outcomes that are comparable to those of an antagonist protocol. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7344689 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73446892020-07-09 Validating the Use of Corifollitropin Alfa in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol on Normal and High Responders by Comparing with Conventional Antagonist Protocol: A Retrospective Study Huang, Chen-Yu Chen, Guan-Yeu Shieh, Miawh-Lirng Li, Hsin-Yang Life (Basel) Article Our previous study showed a satisfactory reproductive outcome resulting from the patient-friendly ovarian stimulation protocol using long-acting follicle stimulation hormone (FSH) plus oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA). The present retrospective study aims to compare the efficacy of the patient-friendly ovarian stimulation protocol with that of the antagonist protocol on normal and high responders aged between 24 and 39 years in a tertiary fertility center in Taiwan. To prevent premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge, oral MPA was given to patients in group 1 (n = 57), whereas antagonist protocol was applied to group 2 (n = 53). Duration and dosage of stimulation, number of injections and visits before trigger, incidence of premature LH surge, number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, cleavage rate, rate of good embryos available, incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, cumulative clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate per retrieval were compared between groups. We conclude that our patient-friendly ovarian stimulation protocol with MPA demonstrates satisfactory stimulation and reproductive outcomes that are comparable to those of an antagonist protocol. MDPI 2020-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7344689/ /pubmed/32575849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life10060090 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Huang, Chen-Yu Chen, Guan-Yeu Shieh, Miawh-Lirng Li, Hsin-Yang Validating the Use of Corifollitropin Alfa in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol on Normal and High Responders by Comparing with Conventional Antagonist Protocol: A Retrospective Study |
title | Validating the Use of Corifollitropin Alfa in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol on Normal and High Responders by Comparing with Conventional Antagonist Protocol: A Retrospective Study |
title_full | Validating the Use of Corifollitropin Alfa in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol on Normal and High Responders by Comparing with Conventional Antagonist Protocol: A Retrospective Study |
title_fullStr | Validating the Use of Corifollitropin Alfa in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol on Normal and High Responders by Comparing with Conventional Antagonist Protocol: A Retrospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Validating the Use of Corifollitropin Alfa in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol on Normal and High Responders by Comparing with Conventional Antagonist Protocol: A Retrospective Study |
title_short | Validating the Use of Corifollitropin Alfa in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol on Normal and High Responders by Comparing with Conventional Antagonist Protocol: A Retrospective Study |
title_sort | validating the use of corifollitropin alfa in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol on normal and high responders by comparing with conventional antagonist protocol: a retrospective study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7344689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32575849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life10060090 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangchenyu validatingtheuseofcorifollitropinalfainprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolonnormalandhighrespondersbycomparingwithconventionalantagonistprotocolaretrospectivestudy AT chenguanyeu validatingtheuseofcorifollitropinalfainprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolonnormalandhighrespondersbycomparingwithconventionalantagonistprotocolaretrospectivestudy AT shiehmiawhlirng validatingtheuseofcorifollitropinalfainprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolonnormalandhighrespondersbycomparingwithconventionalantagonistprotocolaretrospectivestudy AT lihsinyang validatingtheuseofcorifollitropinalfainprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolonnormalandhighrespondersbycomparingwithconventionalantagonistprotocolaretrospectivestudy |