Cargando…

Interception Systems in Assessment of Dermal Exposure to Pesticides: Laboratory Comparison of Media

Dermal exposure of workers to pesticides can be assessed using patches, placed on the workers’ clothes or used to wipe off the substance from the skin. Since there are no official indications of the materials to be used for patch sampling, a wide range of materials is suggested in the scientific lit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barrese, Elena, Tranfo, Giovanna, Marramao, Antonella, Scarpelli, Marialuisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7344812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32570884
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124389
_version_ 1783556030883430400
author Barrese, Elena
Tranfo, Giovanna
Marramao, Antonella
Scarpelli, Marialuisa
author_facet Barrese, Elena
Tranfo, Giovanna
Marramao, Antonella
Scarpelli, Marialuisa
author_sort Barrese, Elena
collection PubMed
description Dermal exposure of workers to pesticides can be assessed using patches, placed on the workers’ clothes or used to wipe off the substance from the skin. Since there are no official indications of the materials to be used for patch sampling, a wide range of materials is suggested in the scientific literature. This paper reports a laboratory study on the affinity of four different pesticides widely used in southern Italy with five patch matrices. Imidacloprid, Hexythiazox, Boscalid and Myclobutanil were tested with cotton and gauze sheets, polyethylene tissue and two different grades of cellulose papers. An aerosol machine was used to nebulize the substance on the patches in a closed system, simulating the conditions of use on the workers’ clothes. The recovery of the analytes from the media was evaluated, by spiking the patches with a known amount of each active substance and testing their performances as skin wipes. Samples were extracted and analyzed in gas chromatography with an electron capture detector. The recovery from the spiked patches was 89–96% for all pesticides, while the test recoveries were very different. Results showed a higher affinity with Imidacloprid and Hexythiazox for gauze, with Myclobutanil for cotton and with Boscalid for paper filters (W41).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7344812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73448122020-07-09 Interception Systems in Assessment of Dermal Exposure to Pesticides: Laboratory Comparison of Media Barrese, Elena Tranfo, Giovanna Marramao, Antonella Scarpelli, Marialuisa Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Dermal exposure of workers to pesticides can be assessed using patches, placed on the workers’ clothes or used to wipe off the substance from the skin. Since there are no official indications of the materials to be used for patch sampling, a wide range of materials is suggested in the scientific literature. This paper reports a laboratory study on the affinity of four different pesticides widely used in southern Italy with five patch matrices. Imidacloprid, Hexythiazox, Boscalid and Myclobutanil were tested with cotton and gauze sheets, polyethylene tissue and two different grades of cellulose papers. An aerosol machine was used to nebulize the substance on the patches in a closed system, simulating the conditions of use on the workers’ clothes. The recovery of the analytes from the media was evaluated, by spiking the patches with a known amount of each active substance and testing their performances as skin wipes. Samples were extracted and analyzed in gas chromatography with an electron capture detector. The recovery from the spiked patches was 89–96% for all pesticides, while the test recoveries were very different. Results showed a higher affinity with Imidacloprid and Hexythiazox for gauze, with Myclobutanil for cotton and with Boscalid for paper filters (W41). MDPI 2020-06-18 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7344812/ /pubmed/32570884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124389 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Barrese, Elena
Tranfo, Giovanna
Marramao, Antonella
Scarpelli, Marialuisa
Interception Systems in Assessment of Dermal Exposure to Pesticides: Laboratory Comparison of Media
title Interception Systems in Assessment of Dermal Exposure to Pesticides: Laboratory Comparison of Media
title_full Interception Systems in Assessment of Dermal Exposure to Pesticides: Laboratory Comparison of Media
title_fullStr Interception Systems in Assessment of Dermal Exposure to Pesticides: Laboratory Comparison of Media
title_full_unstemmed Interception Systems in Assessment of Dermal Exposure to Pesticides: Laboratory Comparison of Media
title_short Interception Systems in Assessment of Dermal Exposure to Pesticides: Laboratory Comparison of Media
title_sort interception systems in assessment of dermal exposure to pesticides: laboratory comparison of media
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7344812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32570884
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124389
work_keys_str_mv AT barreseelena interceptionsystemsinassessmentofdermalexposuretopesticideslaboratorycomparisonofmedia
AT tranfogiovanna interceptionsystemsinassessmentofdermalexposuretopesticideslaboratorycomparisonofmedia
AT marramaoantonella interceptionsystemsinassessmentofdermalexposuretopesticideslaboratorycomparisonofmedia
AT scarpellimarialuisa interceptionsystemsinassessmentofdermalexposuretopesticideslaboratorycomparisonofmedia