Cargando…
Interception Systems in Assessment of Dermal Exposure to Pesticides: Laboratory Comparison of Media
Dermal exposure of workers to pesticides can be assessed using patches, placed on the workers’ clothes or used to wipe off the substance from the skin. Since there are no official indications of the materials to be used for patch sampling, a wide range of materials is suggested in the scientific lit...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7344812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32570884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124389 |
_version_ | 1783556030883430400 |
---|---|
author | Barrese, Elena Tranfo, Giovanna Marramao, Antonella Scarpelli, Marialuisa |
author_facet | Barrese, Elena Tranfo, Giovanna Marramao, Antonella Scarpelli, Marialuisa |
author_sort | Barrese, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dermal exposure of workers to pesticides can be assessed using patches, placed on the workers’ clothes or used to wipe off the substance from the skin. Since there are no official indications of the materials to be used for patch sampling, a wide range of materials is suggested in the scientific literature. This paper reports a laboratory study on the affinity of four different pesticides widely used in southern Italy with five patch matrices. Imidacloprid, Hexythiazox, Boscalid and Myclobutanil were tested with cotton and gauze sheets, polyethylene tissue and two different grades of cellulose papers. An aerosol machine was used to nebulize the substance on the patches in a closed system, simulating the conditions of use on the workers’ clothes. The recovery of the analytes from the media was evaluated, by spiking the patches with a known amount of each active substance and testing their performances as skin wipes. Samples were extracted and analyzed in gas chromatography with an electron capture detector. The recovery from the spiked patches was 89–96% for all pesticides, while the test recoveries were very different. Results showed a higher affinity with Imidacloprid and Hexythiazox for gauze, with Myclobutanil for cotton and with Boscalid for paper filters (W41). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7344812 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73448122020-07-09 Interception Systems in Assessment of Dermal Exposure to Pesticides: Laboratory Comparison of Media Barrese, Elena Tranfo, Giovanna Marramao, Antonella Scarpelli, Marialuisa Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Dermal exposure of workers to pesticides can be assessed using patches, placed on the workers’ clothes or used to wipe off the substance from the skin. Since there are no official indications of the materials to be used for patch sampling, a wide range of materials is suggested in the scientific literature. This paper reports a laboratory study on the affinity of four different pesticides widely used in southern Italy with five patch matrices. Imidacloprid, Hexythiazox, Boscalid and Myclobutanil were tested with cotton and gauze sheets, polyethylene tissue and two different grades of cellulose papers. An aerosol machine was used to nebulize the substance on the patches in a closed system, simulating the conditions of use on the workers’ clothes. The recovery of the analytes from the media was evaluated, by spiking the patches with a known amount of each active substance and testing their performances as skin wipes. Samples were extracted and analyzed in gas chromatography with an electron capture detector. The recovery from the spiked patches was 89–96% for all pesticides, while the test recoveries were very different. Results showed a higher affinity with Imidacloprid and Hexythiazox for gauze, with Myclobutanil for cotton and with Boscalid for paper filters (W41). MDPI 2020-06-18 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7344812/ /pubmed/32570884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124389 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Barrese, Elena Tranfo, Giovanna Marramao, Antonella Scarpelli, Marialuisa Interception Systems in Assessment of Dermal Exposure to Pesticides: Laboratory Comparison of Media |
title | Interception Systems in Assessment of Dermal Exposure to Pesticides: Laboratory Comparison of Media |
title_full | Interception Systems in Assessment of Dermal Exposure to Pesticides: Laboratory Comparison of Media |
title_fullStr | Interception Systems in Assessment of Dermal Exposure to Pesticides: Laboratory Comparison of Media |
title_full_unstemmed | Interception Systems in Assessment of Dermal Exposure to Pesticides: Laboratory Comparison of Media |
title_short | Interception Systems in Assessment of Dermal Exposure to Pesticides: Laboratory Comparison of Media |
title_sort | interception systems in assessment of dermal exposure to pesticides: laboratory comparison of media |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7344812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32570884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124389 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barreseelena interceptionsystemsinassessmentofdermalexposuretopesticideslaboratorycomparisonofmedia AT tranfogiovanna interceptionsystemsinassessmentofdermalexposuretopesticideslaboratorycomparisonofmedia AT marramaoantonella interceptionsystemsinassessmentofdermalexposuretopesticideslaboratorycomparisonofmedia AT scarpellimarialuisa interceptionsystemsinassessmentofdermalexposuretopesticideslaboratorycomparisonofmedia |