Cargando…
Determination of Delafloxacin in Pharmaceutical Formulations Using a Green RP-HPTLC and NP-HPTLC Methods: A Comparative Study
In this work; delafloxacin (DLFX) was determined using a validated green RP-HPTLC and NP-HPTLC methods in commercial tablets and in-house developed solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs). RP-HPTLC determination of DLFX was performed using “RP-18 silica gel 60 F254S HPTLC plates”. However; NP-HPTLC estimat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7344820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32630451 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9060359 |
_version_ | 1783556032737312768 |
---|---|
author | Alam, Prawez Ezzeldin, Essam Iqbal, Muzaffar Mostafa, Gamal A.E. Anwer, Md. Khalid Alqarni, Mohammed H. Foudah, Ahmed I. Shakeel, Faiyaz |
author_facet | Alam, Prawez Ezzeldin, Essam Iqbal, Muzaffar Mostafa, Gamal A.E. Anwer, Md. Khalid Alqarni, Mohammed H. Foudah, Ahmed I. Shakeel, Faiyaz |
author_sort | Alam, Prawez |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this work; delafloxacin (DLFX) was determined using a validated green RP-HPTLC and NP-HPTLC methods in commercial tablets and in-house developed solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs). RP-HPTLC determination of DLFX was performed using “RP-18 silica gel 60 F254S HPTLC plates”. However; NP-HPTLC estimation of DLFX was performed using “silica gel 60 F254S HPTLC plates”. For a green RP-HPTLC method; the ternary combination of ethanol:water:ammonia solution (5:4:2 v/v/v) was used as green mobile phase. However; for NP-HPTLC method; the ternary mixture of ethyl acetate: methanol: ammonia solution (5:4:2 v/v/v) was used as normal mobile phase. The analysis of DLFX was conducted in absorbance/reflectance mode of densitometry at λ(max) = 295 nm for both methods. RP-HPTLC method was found more accurate, precise, robust and sensitive for the analysis of DLFX compared with the NP-HPTLC method. The % assay of DLFX in commercial tablets and in-house developed SLNs was determined as 98.2 and 101.0%, respectively, using the green RP-HPTLC technique, however; the % assay of DLFX in commercial tablets and in-house developed SLNs was found to be 94.4 and 95.0%, respectively, using the NP-HPTLC method. Overall, the green RP-HPTLC method was found superior over the NP-HPTLC. Therefore, the proposed green RP-HPTLC method can be successfully applied for analysis of DLFX in commercial tablets, SLNs and other formulations containing DLFX. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7344820 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73448202020-07-09 Determination of Delafloxacin in Pharmaceutical Formulations Using a Green RP-HPTLC and NP-HPTLC Methods: A Comparative Study Alam, Prawez Ezzeldin, Essam Iqbal, Muzaffar Mostafa, Gamal A.E. Anwer, Md. Khalid Alqarni, Mohammed H. Foudah, Ahmed I. Shakeel, Faiyaz Antibiotics (Basel) Article In this work; delafloxacin (DLFX) was determined using a validated green RP-HPTLC and NP-HPTLC methods in commercial tablets and in-house developed solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs). RP-HPTLC determination of DLFX was performed using “RP-18 silica gel 60 F254S HPTLC plates”. However; NP-HPTLC estimation of DLFX was performed using “silica gel 60 F254S HPTLC plates”. For a green RP-HPTLC method; the ternary combination of ethanol:water:ammonia solution (5:4:2 v/v/v) was used as green mobile phase. However; for NP-HPTLC method; the ternary mixture of ethyl acetate: methanol: ammonia solution (5:4:2 v/v/v) was used as normal mobile phase. The analysis of DLFX was conducted in absorbance/reflectance mode of densitometry at λ(max) = 295 nm for both methods. RP-HPTLC method was found more accurate, precise, robust and sensitive for the analysis of DLFX compared with the NP-HPTLC method. The % assay of DLFX in commercial tablets and in-house developed SLNs was determined as 98.2 and 101.0%, respectively, using the green RP-HPTLC technique, however; the % assay of DLFX in commercial tablets and in-house developed SLNs was found to be 94.4 and 95.0%, respectively, using the NP-HPTLC method. Overall, the green RP-HPTLC method was found superior over the NP-HPTLC. Therefore, the proposed green RP-HPTLC method can be successfully applied for analysis of DLFX in commercial tablets, SLNs and other formulations containing DLFX. MDPI 2020-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7344820/ /pubmed/32630451 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9060359 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Alam, Prawez Ezzeldin, Essam Iqbal, Muzaffar Mostafa, Gamal A.E. Anwer, Md. Khalid Alqarni, Mohammed H. Foudah, Ahmed I. Shakeel, Faiyaz Determination of Delafloxacin in Pharmaceutical Formulations Using a Green RP-HPTLC and NP-HPTLC Methods: A Comparative Study |
title | Determination of Delafloxacin in Pharmaceutical Formulations Using a Green RP-HPTLC and NP-HPTLC Methods: A Comparative Study |
title_full | Determination of Delafloxacin in Pharmaceutical Formulations Using a Green RP-HPTLC and NP-HPTLC Methods: A Comparative Study |
title_fullStr | Determination of Delafloxacin in Pharmaceutical Formulations Using a Green RP-HPTLC and NP-HPTLC Methods: A Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Determination of Delafloxacin in Pharmaceutical Formulations Using a Green RP-HPTLC and NP-HPTLC Methods: A Comparative Study |
title_short | Determination of Delafloxacin in Pharmaceutical Formulations Using a Green RP-HPTLC and NP-HPTLC Methods: A Comparative Study |
title_sort | determination of delafloxacin in pharmaceutical formulations using a green rp-hptlc and np-hptlc methods: a comparative study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7344820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32630451 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9060359 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alamprawez determinationofdelafloxacininpharmaceuticalformulationsusingagreenrphptlcandnphptlcmethodsacomparativestudy AT ezzeldinessam determinationofdelafloxacininpharmaceuticalformulationsusingagreenrphptlcandnphptlcmethodsacomparativestudy AT iqbalmuzaffar determinationofdelafloxacininpharmaceuticalformulationsusingagreenrphptlcandnphptlcmethodsacomparativestudy AT mostafagamalae determinationofdelafloxacininpharmaceuticalformulationsusingagreenrphptlcandnphptlcmethodsacomparativestudy AT anwermdkhalid determinationofdelafloxacininpharmaceuticalformulationsusingagreenrphptlcandnphptlcmethodsacomparativestudy AT alqarnimohammedh determinationofdelafloxacininpharmaceuticalformulationsusingagreenrphptlcandnphptlcmethodsacomparativestudy AT foudahahmedi determinationofdelafloxacininpharmaceuticalformulationsusingagreenrphptlcandnphptlcmethodsacomparativestudy AT shakeelfaiyaz determinationofdelafloxacininpharmaceuticalformulationsusingagreenrphptlcandnphptlcmethodsacomparativestudy |