Cargando…

Debonding and Clean-Up in Orthodontics: Evaluation of Different Techniques and Micro-Morphological Aspects of the Enamel Surface

There is currently no consensus on the best way to remove adhesive remnants from teeth following debonding. The main objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of four adhesive resin removal (clean-up) techniques, performed with or without the use of an operative microscope...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D’Amario, Maurizio, Bernardi, Sara, Di Lauro, Daniele, Marzo, Giuseppe, Macchiarelli, Guido, Capogreco, Mario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7344892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32560482
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8020058
_version_ 1783556047441494016
author D’Amario, Maurizio
Bernardi, Sara
Di Lauro, Daniele
Marzo, Giuseppe
Macchiarelli, Guido
Capogreco, Mario
author_facet D’Amario, Maurizio
Bernardi, Sara
Di Lauro, Daniele
Marzo, Giuseppe
Macchiarelli, Guido
Capogreco, Mario
author_sort D’Amario, Maurizio
collection PubMed
description There is currently no consensus on the best way to remove adhesive remnants from teeth following debonding. The main objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of four adhesive resin removal (clean-up) techniques, performed with or without the use of an operative microscope. Forty human teeth were duplicated using an epoxy resin for impregnation. Brackets were bonded to teeth and debonded from teeth. Then, the samples were randomly divided into two equal groups—the naked eye group and the magnification group—and further subdivided into four equal subgroups, in order to compare the different techniques used for the clean-up. Each subgroup was formed of five natural teeth with the respective pre- and post-bonding replicas. Macro- and micro-analysis by means of a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy evaluated, qualitatively and quantitatively, the adhesive remnant index and the damage index of the enamel. Overall, the magnification improved the removal of resins compared to the naked eye (p < 0.001), and the use of magnification constantly reduced resin residual and surface damage. Enamel damage and adhesive residual from the clean-up procedures represent an ascertained risk in orthodontics. The use of a magnification system improves the quality of debonding and clean-up techniques in a significant way.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7344892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73448922020-07-09 Debonding and Clean-Up in Orthodontics: Evaluation of Different Techniques and Micro-Morphological Aspects of the Enamel Surface D’Amario, Maurizio Bernardi, Sara Di Lauro, Daniele Marzo, Giuseppe Macchiarelli, Guido Capogreco, Mario Dent J (Basel) Article There is currently no consensus on the best way to remove adhesive remnants from teeth following debonding. The main objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of four adhesive resin removal (clean-up) techniques, performed with or without the use of an operative microscope. Forty human teeth were duplicated using an epoxy resin for impregnation. Brackets were bonded to teeth and debonded from teeth. Then, the samples were randomly divided into two equal groups—the naked eye group and the magnification group—and further subdivided into four equal subgroups, in order to compare the different techniques used for the clean-up. Each subgroup was formed of five natural teeth with the respective pre- and post-bonding replicas. Macro- and micro-analysis by means of a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy evaluated, qualitatively and quantitatively, the adhesive remnant index and the damage index of the enamel. Overall, the magnification improved the removal of resins compared to the naked eye (p < 0.001), and the use of magnification constantly reduced resin residual and surface damage. Enamel damage and adhesive residual from the clean-up procedures represent an ascertained risk in orthodontics. The use of a magnification system improves the quality of debonding and clean-up techniques in a significant way. MDPI 2020-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7344892/ /pubmed/32560482 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8020058 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
D’Amario, Maurizio
Bernardi, Sara
Di Lauro, Daniele
Marzo, Giuseppe
Macchiarelli, Guido
Capogreco, Mario
Debonding and Clean-Up in Orthodontics: Evaluation of Different Techniques and Micro-Morphological Aspects of the Enamel Surface
title Debonding and Clean-Up in Orthodontics: Evaluation of Different Techniques and Micro-Morphological Aspects of the Enamel Surface
title_full Debonding and Clean-Up in Orthodontics: Evaluation of Different Techniques and Micro-Morphological Aspects of the Enamel Surface
title_fullStr Debonding and Clean-Up in Orthodontics: Evaluation of Different Techniques and Micro-Morphological Aspects of the Enamel Surface
title_full_unstemmed Debonding and Clean-Up in Orthodontics: Evaluation of Different Techniques and Micro-Morphological Aspects of the Enamel Surface
title_short Debonding and Clean-Up in Orthodontics: Evaluation of Different Techniques and Micro-Morphological Aspects of the Enamel Surface
title_sort debonding and clean-up in orthodontics: evaluation of different techniques and micro-morphological aspects of the enamel surface
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7344892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32560482
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8020058
work_keys_str_mv AT damariomaurizio debondingandcleanupinorthodonticsevaluationofdifferenttechniquesandmicromorphologicalaspectsoftheenamelsurface
AT bernardisara debondingandcleanupinorthodonticsevaluationofdifferenttechniquesandmicromorphologicalaspectsoftheenamelsurface
AT dilaurodaniele debondingandcleanupinorthodonticsevaluationofdifferenttechniquesandmicromorphologicalaspectsoftheenamelsurface
AT marzogiuseppe debondingandcleanupinorthodonticsevaluationofdifferenttechniquesandmicromorphologicalaspectsoftheenamelsurface
AT macchiarelliguido debondingandcleanupinorthodonticsevaluationofdifferenttechniquesandmicromorphologicalaspectsoftheenamelsurface
AT capogrecomario debondingandcleanupinorthodonticsevaluationofdifferenttechniquesandmicromorphologicalaspectsoftheenamelsurface