Cargando…

Advances in the Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism: A Literature Review

The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) is increasing. The increase in suspicion for VTE has lowered the threshold for performing imaging studies to confirm diagnosis of VTE. However, only 20% of suspected cases...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Harish, Sun, Haozhe, Hussain, Ali N., Vakde, Trupti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7345080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32498355
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10060365
_version_ 1783556096706740224
author Patel, Harish
Sun, Haozhe
Hussain, Ali N.
Vakde, Trupti
author_facet Patel, Harish
Sun, Haozhe
Hussain, Ali N.
Vakde, Trupti
author_sort Patel, Harish
collection PubMed
description The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) is increasing. The increase in suspicion for VTE has lowered the threshold for performing imaging studies to confirm diagnosis of VTE. However, only 20% of suspected cases have a confirmed diagnosis of VTE. Development of pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) and update in pre-test probability have changed the paradigm of ruling-out patient with low index of suspicion. The D-dimer test in conjunction to the pre-test probability has been utilized in VTE diagnosis. The age appropriate D-dimer cutoff and inclusion of YEARS algorithm (signs of the DVT, hemoptysis and whether PE is the likely diagnosis) for the D-dimer cutoff have been recent updates in the evaluation of suspected PE. Multi-detector computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and compression ultrasound (CUS) are the preferred imaging modality to diagnose PE and DVT respectively. The VTE diagnostic algorithm do differ in pregnant individuals. The prerequisite of avoiding excessive radiation has recruited planar ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan as preferred in pregnant patients to evaluate for PE. The modification of CUS protocol with addition of the Valsalva maneuver should be performed while evaluating DVT in pregnant individual.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7345080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73450802020-07-09 Advances in the Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism: A Literature Review Patel, Harish Sun, Haozhe Hussain, Ali N. Vakde, Trupti Diagnostics (Basel) Review The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) is increasing. The increase in suspicion for VTE has lowered the threshold for performing imaging studies to confirm diagnosis of VTE. However, only 20% of suspected cases have a confirmed diagnosis of VTE. Development of pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) and update in pre-test probability have changed the paradigm of ruling-out patient with low index of suspicion. The D-dimer test in conjunction to the pre-test probability has been utilized in VTE diagnosis. The age appropriate D-dimer cutoff and inclusion of YEARS algorithm (signs of the DVT, hemoptysis and whether PE is the likely diagnosis) for the D-dimer cutoff have been recent updates in the evaluation of suspected PE. Multi-detector computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and compression ultrasound (CUS) are the preferred imaging modality to diagnose PE and DVT respectively. The VTE diagnostic algorithm do differ in pregnant individuals. The prerequisite of avoiding excessive radiation has recruited planar ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan as preferred in pregnant patients to evaluate for PE. The modification of CUS protocol with addition of the Valsalva maneuver should be performed while evaluating DVT in pregnant individual. MDPI 2020-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7345080/ /pubmed/32498355 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10060365 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Patel, Harish
Sun, Haozhe
Hussain, Ali N.
Vakde, Trupti
Advances in the Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism: A Literature Review
title Advances in the Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism: A Literature Review
title_full Advances in the Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism: A Literature Review
title_fullStr Advances in the Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism: A Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Advances in the Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism: A Literature Review
title_short Advances in the Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism: A Literature Review
title_sort advances in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: a literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7345080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32498355
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10060365
work_keys_str_mv AT patelharish advancesinthediagnosisofvenousthromboembolismaliteraturereview
AT sunhaozhe advancesinthediagnosisofvenousthromboembolismaliteraturereview
AT hussainalin advancesinthediagnosisofvenousthromboembolismaliteraturereview
AT vakdetrupti advancesinthediagnosisofvenousthromboembolismaliteraturereview