Cargando…
In Vitro Comparison of Macrophage Polarization and Osteoblast Differentiation Potentials between Granules and Block Forms of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral
Deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) bone grafts are commonly utilized for guided bone regeneration (GBR) techniques in regenerative dentistry. It has been hypothesized that different forms (blocks versus particulates) might demonstrate the varying properties of cell behavior during the regenera...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7345324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32545502 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13122682 |
_version_ | 1783556155004420096 |
---|---|
author | Fujioka-Kobayashi, Masako Marjanowski, Simon D. Kono, Michihide Katagiri, Hiroki Miron, Richard J. Schaller, Benoit |
author_facet | Fujioka-Kobayashi, Masako Marjanowski, Simon D. Kono, Michihide Katagiri, Hiroki Miron, Richard J. Schaller, Benoit |
author_sort | Fujioka-Kobayashi, Masako |
collection | PubMed |
description | Deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) bone grafts are commonly utilized for guided bone regeneration (GBR) techniques in regenerative dentistry. It has been hypothesized that different forms (blocks versus particulates) might demonstrate the varying properties of cell behavior during the regenerative process. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate DBBM granules and blocks for their effects on osteoblasts and macrophages (Mφs). DBBM granules and blocks were filled to the same size (φ6.4 mm in diameter × 2.0 mm in height) in cell culture wells and assessed for cell viability and cell differentiation of human osteoblast-like Saos-2 cells, and Mφs derived from human monocyte THP-1 cells. The two groups were first characterized by micro-CT analysis, which demonstrated that DBBM granules had a two-fold greater material volume and a four-fold larger surface area than the blocks. DBBM blocks showed superior viability for both osteoblasts and Mφs. Osteoblast experiments were then utilized to better characterize the influence of DBBM shapes/forms on osteoblast differentiation. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining on the undecalcified frozen sections was observed throughout the DBBM granule surface, yet this staining was only observed on the upper portion of the DBBM blocks. Furthermore, DBBM blocks showed M1-Mφ polarization trends with higher IL-1 and IL-6 mRNA expression in Mφs, while the conditioned media from Mφs cultured on DBBM granules promoted osteoblast differentiation with higher mRNA levels of Runx 2, ALP and osteocalcin. In conclusion, the DBBM granules showed more regenerative effects, lower M1 marker expression, and higher osteoblast differentiation potential when compared with the blocks, which might be related to the larger material volume, higher surface area and greater ability for the cells to penetrate through the scaffold. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7345324 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73453242020-07-09 In Vitro Comparison of Macrophage Polarization and Osteoblast Differentiation Potentials between Granules and Block Forms of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral Fujioka-Kobayashi, Masako Marjanowski, Simon D. Kono, Michihide Katagiri, Hiroki Miron, Richard J. Schaller, Benoit Materials (Basel) Article Deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) bone grafts are commonly utilized for guided bone regeneration (GBR) techniques in regenerative dentistry. It has been hypothesized that different forms (blocks versus particulates) might demonstrate the varying properties of cell behavior during the regenerative process. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate DBBM granules and blocks for their effects on osteoblasts and macrophages (Mφs). DBBM granules and blocks were filled to the same size (φ6.4 mm in diameter × 2.0 mm in height) in cell culture wells and assessed for cell viability and cell differentiation of human osteoblast-like Saos-2 cells, and Mφs derived from human monocyte THP-1 cells. The two groups were first characterized by micro-CT analysis, which demonstrated that DBBM granules had a two-fold greater material volume and a four-fold larger surface area than the blocks. DBBM blocks showed superior viability for both osteoblasts and Mφs. Osteoblast experiments were then utilized to better characterize the influence of DBBM shapes/forms on osteoblast differentiation. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining on the undecalcified frozen sections was observed throughout the DBBM granule surface, yet this staining was only observed on the upper portion of the DBBM blocks. Furthermore, DBBM blocks showed M1-Mφ polarization trends with higher IL-1 and IL-6 mRNA expression in Mφs, while the conditioned media from Mφs cultured on DBBM granules promoted osteoblast differentiation with higher mRNA levels of Runx 2, ALP and osteocalcin. In conclusion, the DBBM granules showed more regenerative effects, lower M1 marker expression, and higher osteoblast differentiation potential when compared with the blocks, which might be related to the larger material volume, higher surface area and greater ability for the cells to penetrate through the scaffold. MDPI 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7345324/ /pubmed/32545502 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13122682 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Fujioka-Kobayashi, Masako Marjanowski, Simon D. Kono, Michihide Katagiri, Hiroki Miron, Richard J. Schaller, Benoit In Vitro Comparison of Macrophage Polarization and Osteoblast Differentiation Potentials between Granules and Block Forms of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral |
title | In Vitro Comparison of Macrophage Polarization and Osteoblast Differentiation Potentials between Granules and Block Forms of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral |
title_full | In Vitro Comparison of Macrophage Polarization and Osteoblast Differentiation Potentials between Granules and Block Forms of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral |
title_fullStr | In Vitro Comparison of Macrophage Polarization and Osteoblast Differentiation Potentials between Granules and Block Forms of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral |
title_full_unstemmed | In Vitro Comparison of Macrophage Polarization and Osteoblast Differentiation Potentials between Granules and Block Forms of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral |
title_short | In Vitro Comparison of Macrophage Polarization and Osteoblast Differentiation Potentials between Granules and Block Forms of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral |
title_sort | in vitro comparison of macrophage polarization and osteoblast differentiation potentials between granules and block forms of deproteinized bovine bone mineral |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7345324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32545502 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13122682 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fujiokakobayashimasako invitrocomparisonofmacrophagepolarizationandosteoblastdifferentiationpotentialsbetweengranulesandblockformsofdeproteinizedbovinebonemineral AT marjanowskisimond invitrocomparisonofmacrophagepolarizationandosteoblastdifferentiationpotentialsbetweengranulesandblockformsofdeproteinizedbovinebonemineral AT konomichihide invitrocomparisonofmacrophagepolarizationandosteoblastdifferentiationpotentialsbetweengranulesandblockformsofdeproteinizedbovinebonemineral AT katagirihiroki invitrocomparisonofmacrophagepolarizationandosteoblastdifferentiationpotentialsbetweengranulesandblockformsofdeproteinizedbovinebonemineral AT mironrichardj invitrocomparisonofmacrophagepolarizationandosteoblastdifferentiationpotentialsbetweengranulesandblockformsofdeproteinizedbovinebonemineral AT schallerbenoit invitrocomparisonofmacrophagepolarizationandosteoblastdifferentiationpotentialsbetweengranulesandblockformsofdeproteinizedbovinebonemineral |