Cargando…

In Vitro Comparison of Macrophage Polarization and Osteoblast Differentiation Potentials between Granules and Block Forms of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral

Deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) bone grafts are commonly utilized for guided bone regeneration (GBR) techniques in regenerative dentistry. It has been hypothesized that different forms (blocks versus particulates) might demonstrate the varying properties of cell behavior during the regenera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujioka-Kobayashi, Masako, Marjanowski, Simon D., Kono, Michihide, Katagiri, Hiroki, Miron, Richard J., Schaller, Benoit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7345324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32545502
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13122682
_version_ 1783556155004420096
author Fujioka-Kobayashi, Masako
Marjanowski, Simon D.
Kono, Michihide
Katagiri, Hiroki
Miron, Richard J.
Schaller, Benoit
author_facet Fujioka-Kobayashi, Masako
Marjanowski, Simon D.
Kono, Michihide
Katagiri, Hiroki
Miron, Richard J.
Schaller, Benoit
author_sort Fujioka-Kobayashi, Masako
collection PubMed
description Deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) bone grafts are commonly utilized for guided bone regeneration (GBR) techniques in regenerative dentistry. It has been hypothesized that different forms (blocks versus particulates) might demonstrate the varying properties of cell behavior during the regenerative process. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate DBBM granules and blocks for their effects on osteoblasts and macrophages (Mφs). DBBM granules and blocks were filled to the same size (φ6.4 mm in diameter × 2.0 mm in height) in cell culture wells and assessed for cell viability and cell differentiation of human osteoblast-like Saos-2 cells, and Mφs derived from human monocyte THP-1 cells. The two groups were first characterized by micro-CT analysis, which demonstrated that DBBM granules had a two-fold greater material volume and a four-fold larger surface area than the blocks. DBBM blocks showed superior viability for both osteoblasts and Mφs. Osteoblast experiments were then utilized to better characterize the influence of DBBM shapes/forms on osteoblast differentiation. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining on the undecalcified frozen sections was observed throughout the DBBM granule surface, yet this staining was only observed on the upper portion of the DBBM blocks. Furthermore, DBBM blocks showed M1-Mφ polarization trends with higher IL-1 and IL-6 mRNA expression in Mφs, while the conditioned media from Mφs cultured on DBBM granules promoted osteoblast differentiation with higher mRNA levels of Runx 2, ALP and osteocalcin. In conclusion, the DBBM granules showed more regenerative effects, lower M1 marker expression, and higher osteoblast differentiation potential when compared with the blocks, which might be related to the larger material volume, higher surface area and greater ability for the cells to penetrate through the scaffold.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7345324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73453242020-07-09 In Vitro Comparison of Macrophage Polarization and Osteoblast Differentiation Potentials between Granules and Block Forms of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral Fujioka-Kobayashi, Masako Marjanowski, Simon D. Kono, Michihide Katagiri, Hiroki Miron, Richard J. Schaller, Benoit Materials (Basel) Article Deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) bone grafts are commonly utilized for guided bone regeneration (GBR) techniques in regenerative dentistry. It has been hypothesized that different forms (blocks versus particulates) might demonstrate the varying properties of cell behavior during the regenerative process. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate DBBM granules and blocks for their effects on osteoblasts and macrophages (Mφs). DBBM granules and blocks were filled to the same size (φ6.4 mm in diameter × 2.0 mm in height) in cell culture wells and assessed for cell viability and cell differentiation of human osteoblast-like Saos-2 cells, and Mφs derived from human monocyte THP-1 cells. The two groups were first characterized by micro-CT analysis, which demonstrated that DBBM granules had a two-fold greater material volume and a four-fold larger surface area than the blocks. DBBM blocks showed superior viability for both osteoblasts and Mφs. Osteoblast experiments were then utilized to better characterize the influence of DBBM shapes/forms on osteoblast differentiation. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining on the undecalcified frozen sections was observed throughout the DBBM granule surface, yet this staining was only observed on the upper portion of the DBBM blocks. Furthermore, DBBM blocks showed M1-Mφ polarization trends with higher IL-1 and IL-6 mRNA expression in Mφs, while the conditioned media from Mφs cultured on DBBM granules promoted osteoblast differentiation with higher mRNA levels of Runx 2, ALP and osteocalcin. In conclusion, the DBBM granules showed more regenerative effects, lower M1 marker expression, and higher osteoblast differentiation potential when compared with the blocks, which might be related to the larger material volume, higher surface area and greater ability for the cells to penetrate through the scaffold. MDPI 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7345324/ /pubmed/32545502 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13122682 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fujioka-Kobayashi, Masako
Marjanowski, Simon D.
Kono, Michihide
Katagiri, Hiroki
Miron, Richard J.
Schaller, Benoit
In Vitro Comparison of Macrophage Polarization and Osteoblast Differentiation Potentials between Granules and Block Forms of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral
title In Vitro Comparison of Macrophage Polarization and Osteoblast Differentiation Potentials between Granules and Block Forms of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral
title_full In Vitro Comparison of Macrophage Polarization and Osteoblast Differentiation Potentials between Granules and Block Forms of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral
title_fullStr In Vitro Comparison of Macrophage Polarization and Osteoblast Differentiation Potentials between Granules and Block Forms of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Comparison of Macrophage Polarization and Osteoblast Differentiation Potentials between Granules and Block Forms of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral
title_short In Vitro Comparison of Macrophage Polarization and Osteoblast Differentiation Potentials between Granules and Block Forms of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral
title_sort in vitro comparison of macrophage polarization and osteoblast differentiation potentials between granules and block forms of deproteinized bovine bone mineral
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7345324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32545502
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13122682
work_keys_str_mv AT fujiokakobayashimasako invitrocomparisonofmacrophagepolarizationandosteoblastdifferentiationpotentialsbetweengranulesandblockformsofdeproteinizedbovinebonemineral
AT marjanowskisimond invitrocomparisonofmacrophagepolarizationandosteoblastdifferentiationpotentialsbetweengranulesandblockformsofdeproteinizedbovinebonemineral
AT konomichihide invitrocomparisonofmacrophagepolarizationandosteoblastdifferentiationpotentialsbetweengranulesandblockformsofdeproteinizedbovinebonemineral
AT katagirihiroki invitrocomparisonofmacrophagepolarizationandosteoblastdifferentiationpotentialsbetweengranulesandblockformsofdeproteinizedbovinebonemineral
AT mironrichardj invitrocomparisonofmacrophagepolarizationandosteoblastdifferentiationpotentialsbetweengranulesandblockformsofdeproteinizedbovinebonemineral
AT schallerbenoit invitrocomparisonofmacrophagepolarizationandosteoblastdifferentiationpotentialsbetweengranulesandblockformsofdeproteinizedbovinebonemineral