Cargando…
Lack of sensitivity of an IVD/CE-labelled kit targeting the S gene for detection of SARS-CoV-2
OBJECTIVES: New molecular tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are being rapidly launched in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of the VIASURE SARS-CoV-2 S gene...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7345380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32652240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.06.036 |
_version_ | 1783556168592916480 |
---|---|
author | Matzkies, L.-M. Leitner, E. Stelzl, E. Assig, K. Bozic, M. Siebenhofer, D. Mustafa, M.E. Steinmetz, I. Kessler, H.H. |
author_facet | Matzkies, L.-M. Leitner, E. Stelzl, E. Assig, K. Bozic, M. Siebenhofer, D. Mustafa, M.E. Steinmetz, I. Kessler, H.H. |
author_sort | Matzkies, L.-M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: New molecular tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are being rapidly launched in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of the VIASURE SARS-CoV-2 S gene RT-PCR Kit on the BD Max™ system and to compare results with those obtained with the cobas® SARS-CoV-2 test on the cobas® 6800 system. METHODS: For testing the analytical performance, reference material was used. Clinical samples (n = 101) obtained from individuals with symptoms compatible with COVID-19 were studied. Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs were collected by using either ESwab™ or UTM™ collection systems. RESULTS: When the analytical performance was evaluated, the sample containing the lowest SARS-CoV-2 concentration tested negative with the VIASURE test whereas results obtained with the cobas® test were found to be concordant with the results expected. Six out of the 101 clinical samples (5.9%) showed an inhibition with the VIASURE test. When analysing the remaining 95 clinical samples, 27 were found to be negative with both assays. Of 68 samples that were positive with the cobas® test, the VIASURE test missed 21 (30.9 %) samples. All of those 21 samples had shown Ct values ≥ 31 with the cobas® 6800 system. None of the samples tested positive with the VIASURE test and negative with the cobas® test. CONCLUSIONS: The VIASURE test was impaired by a lack of sensitivity and a relatively high number of invalid results. When using the VIASURE test for routine testing, a significant number of COVID-19-positive samples would have been missed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7345380 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73453802020-07-09 Lack of sensitivity of an IVD/CE-labelled kit targeting the S gene for detection of SARS-CoV-2 Matzkies, L.-M. Leitner, E. Stelzl, E. Assig, K. Bozic, M. Siebenhofer, D. Mustafa, M.E. Steinmetz, I. Kessler, H.H. Clin Microbiol Infect Research Note OBJECTIVES: New molecular tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are being rapidly launched in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of the VIASURE SARS-CoV-2 S gene RT-PCR Kit on the BD Max™ system and to compare results with those obtained with the cobas® SARS-CoV-2 test on the cobas® 6800 system. METHODS: For testing the analytical performance, reference material was used. Clinical samples (n = 101) obtained from individuals with symptoms compatible with COVID-19 were studied. Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs were collected by using either ESwab™ or UTM™ collection systems. RESULTS: When the analytical performance was evaluated, the sample containing the lowest SARS-CoV-2 concentration tested negative with the VIASURE test whereas results obtained with the cobas® test were found to be concordant with the results expected. Six out of the 101 clinical samples (5.9%) showed an inhibition with the VIASURE test. When analysing the remaining 95 clinical samples, 27 were found to be negative with both assays. Of 68 samples that were positive with the cobas® test, the VIASURE test missed 21 (30.9 %) samples. All of those 21 samples had shown Ct values ≥ 31 with the cobas® 6800 system. None of the samples tested positive with the VIASURE test and negative with the cobas® test. CONCLUSIONS: The VIASURE test was impaired by a lack of sensitivity and a relatively high number of invalid results. When using the VIASURE test for routine testing, a significant number of COVID-19-positive samples would have been missed. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2020-10 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7345380/ /pubmed/32652240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.06.036 Text en © 2020 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Research Note Matzkies, L.-M. Leitner, E. Stelzl, E. Assig, K. Bozic, M. Siebenhofer, D. Mustafa, M.E. Steinmetz, I. Kessler, H.H. Lack of sensitivity of an IVD/CE-labelled kit targeting the S gene for detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title | Lack of sensitivity of an IVD/CE-labelled kit targeting the S gene for detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full | Lack of sensitivity of an IVD/CE-labelled kit targeting the S gene for detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_fullStr | Lack of sensitivity of an IVD/CE-labelled kit targeting the S gene for detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full_unstemmed | Lack of sensitivity of an IVD/CE-labelled kit targeting the S gene for detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_short | Lack of sensitivity of an IVD/CE-labelled kit targeting the S gene for detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_sort | lack of sensitivity of an ivd/ce-labelled kit targeting the s gene for detection of sars-cov-2 |
topic | Research Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7345380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32652240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.06.036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matzkieslm lackofsensitivityofanivdcelabelledkittargetingthesgenefordetectionofsarscov2 AT leitnere lackofsensitivityofanivdcelabelledkittargetingthesgenefordetectionofsarscov2 AT stelzle lackofsensitivityofanivdcelabelledkittargetingthesgenefordetectionofsarscov2 AT assigk lackofsensitivityofanivdcelabelledkittargetingthesgenefordetectionofsarscov2 AT bozicm lackofsensitivityofanivdcelabelledkittargetingthesgenefordetectionofsarscov2 AT siebenhoferd lackofsensitivityofanivdcelabelledkittargetingthesgenefordetectionofsarscov2 AT mustafame lackofsensitivityofanivdcelabelledkittargetingthesgenefordetectionofsarscov2 AT steinmetzi lackofsensitivityofanivdcelabelledkittargetingthesgenefordetectionofsarscov2 AT kesslerhh lackofsensitivityofanivdcelabelledkittargetingthesgenefordetectionofsarscov2 |