Cargando…

Current usage of tumor treating fields for glioblastoma

BACKGROUND: Tumor Treating Fields (TTF) have entered clinical practice for newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma (GGM). However, controversies remain unresolved with regard to appropriate usage. We sought to determine TTF usage in major academic neuro-oncology programs in New York City, USA and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lassman, Andrew B, Joanta-Gomez, Adela E, Pan, Peter C, Wick, Wolfgang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7345837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32666048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaa069
_version_ 1783556273585782784
author Lassman, Andrew B
Joanta-Gomez, Adela E
Pan, Peter C
Wick, Wolfgang
author_facet Lassman, Andrew B
Joanta-Gomez, Adela E
Pan, Peter C
Wick, Wolfgang
author_sort Lassman, Andrew B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tumor Treating Fields (TTF) have entered clinical practice for newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma (GGM). However, controversies remain unresolved with regard to appropriate usage. We sought to determine TTF usage in major academic neuro-oncology programs in New York City, USA and Heidelberg, Germany and understand current attitudes toward TTF usage among providers. METHODS: We retrospectively determined TTF usage among patients with GGM, before and since the publication of key clinical trial results and regulatory approvals. We also surveyed attendees of an educational session related to TTF during the 2019 American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting. RESULTS: TTF usage remains infrequent (3–12% of patients with newly diagnosed GBM, and 0–16% of patients with recurrent disease) in our practices, although it has increased over time. Among 30 survey respondents (77% of whom self-identified as neuro- or medical oncologists), 60% were convinced that TTF prolongs survival for newly diagnosed GGM despite published phase III data and regulatory approval, and only 30% viewed TTF as definitively part of the standard of care treatment. A majority (87%) opposed mandating TTF incorporation into the design of clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Providers continue to view TTF with some level of skepticism, with a lack of additional supportive data and logistical concerns representing continued barriers to uptake.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7345837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73458372020-07-13 Current usage of tumor treating fields for glioblastoma Lassman, Andrew B Joanta-Gomez, Adela E Pan, Peter C Wick, Wolfgang Neurooncol Adv Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: Tumor Treating Fields (TTF) have entered clinical practice for newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma (GGM). However, controversies remain unresolved with regard to appropriate usage. We sought to determine TTF usage in major academic neuro-oncology programs in New York City, USA and Heidelberg, Germany and understand current attitudes toward TTF usage among providers. METHODS: We retrospectively determined TTF usage among patients with GGM, before and since the publication of key clinical trial results and regulatory approvals. We also surveyed attendees of an educational session related to TTF during the 2019 American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting. RESULTS: TTF usage remains infrequent (3–12% of patients with newly diagnosed GBM, and 0–16% of patients with recurrent disease) in our practices, although it has increased over time. Among 30 survey respondents (77% of whom self-identified as neuro- or medical oncologists), 60% were convinced that TTF prolongs survival for newly diagnosed GGM despite published phase III data and regulatory approval, and only 30% viewed TTF as definitively part of the standard of care treatment. A majority (87%) opposed mandating TTF incorporation into the design of clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Providers continue to view TTF with some level of skepticism, with a lack of additional supportive data and logistical concerns representing continued barriers to uptake. Oxford University Press 2020-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7345837/ /pubmed/32666048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaa069 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Lassman, Andrew B
Joanta-Gomez, Adela E
Pan, Peter C
Wick, Wolfgang
Current usage of tumor treating fields for glioblastoma
title Current usage of tumor treating fields for glioblastoma
title_full Current usage of tumor treating fields for glioblastoma
title_fullStr Current usage of tumor treating fields for glioblastoma
title_full_unstemmed Current usage of tumor treating fields for glioblastoma
title_short Current usage of tumor treating fields for glioblastoma
title_sort current usage of tumor treating fields for glioblastoma
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7345837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32666048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaa069
work_keys_str_mv AT lassmanandrewb currentusageoftumortreatingfieldsforglioblastoma
AT joantagomezadelae currentusageoftumortreatingfieldsforglioblastoma
AT panpeterc currentusageoftumortreatingfieldsforglioblastoma
AT wickwolfgang currentusageoftumortreatingfieldsforglioblastoma