Cargando…

Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Plants at Various Growth Stages Subjected to Extraction—Comparison of the Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Profile

The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in the antioxidant activity and phenolic profile of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) extracts obtained from the aerial parts of plants harvested at five growth stages. In vitro assays were used to determine the antioxidant activity, i.e., ABTS(•+...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gai, Francesco, Karamać, Magdalena, Janiak, Michał A., Amarowicz, Ryszard, Peiretti, Pier Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7346105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32575358
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox9060535
_version_ 1783556334675820544
author Gai, Francesco
Karamać, Magdalena
Janiak, Michał A.
Amarowicz, Ryszard
Peiretti, Pier Giorgio
author_facet Gai, Francesco
Karamać, Magdalena
Janiak, Michał A.
Amarowicz, Ryszard
Peiretti, Pier Giorgio
author_sort Gai, Francesco
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in the antioxidant activity and phenolic profile of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) extracts obtained from the aerial parts of plants harvested at five growth stages. In vitro assays were used to determine the antioxidant activity, i.e., ABTS(•+) and DPPH(•) scavenging activity, the ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and the ability to inhibit β-carotene–linoleic acid emulsion oxidation. Phenolic compounds, such as mono- and dicaffeoylquinic acid isomers and caffeic acid hexose, were identified using the LC–TOF–MS/MS technique. The predominant compound during the growth cycle of the plant was 3,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid, whose content was the highest at the mid-flowering stage. The total phenolic content was also the highest in sunflowers at the mid-flowering stage. The main phenolic compound contents were closely correlated with ABTS(•+) and DPPH(•) scavenging activity and FRAP. No significant correlation was found between the total phenolic content and the antioxidant activity in the emulsion system. The highest antiradical activity and FRAP were generally determined in older plants (mid-flowering and late flowering stages). In conclusion, the aerial parts of sunflowers, in particular those harvested at the mid-flowering stage, are a good plant material from which to obtain phenolic compound extracts, albeit mainly of one class (esters of caffeic acid and quinic acid), with high antioxidant activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7346105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73461052020-07-14 Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Plants at Various Growth Stages Subjected to Extraction—Comparison of the Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Profile Gai, Francesco Karamać, Magdalena Janiak, Michał A. Amarowicz, Ryszard Peiretti, Pier Giorgio Antioxidants (Basel) Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in the antioxidant activity and phenolic profile of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) extracts obtained from the aerial parts of plants harvested at five growth stages. In vitro assays were used to determine the antioxidant activity, i.e., ABTS(•+) and DPPH(•) scavenging activity, the ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and the ability to inhibit β-carotene–linoleic acid emulsion oxidation. Phenolic compounds, such as mono- and dicaffeoylquinic acid isomers and caffeic acid hexose, were identified using the LC–TOF–MS/MS technique. The predominant compound during the growth cycle of the plant was 3,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid, whose content was the highest at the mid-flowering stage. The total phenolic content was also the highest in sunflowers at the mid-flowering stage. The main phenolic compound contents were closely correlated with ABTS(•+) and DPPH(•) scavenging activity and FRAP. No significant correlation was found between the total phenolic content and the antioxidant activity in the emulsion system. The highest antiradical activity and FRAP were generally determined in older plants (mid-flowering and late flowering stages). In conclusion, the aerial parts of sunflowers, in particular those harvested at the mid-flowering stage, are a good plant material from which to obtain phenolic compound extracts, albeit mainly of one class (esters of caffeic acid and quinic acid), with high antioxidant activity. MDPI 2020-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7346105/ /pubmed/32575358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox9060535 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gai, Francesco
Karamać, Magdalena
Janiak, Michał A.
Amarowicz, Ryszard
Peiretti, Pier Giorgio
Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Plants at Various Growth Stages Subjected to Extraction—Comparison of the Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Profile
title Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Plants at Various Growth Stages Subjected to Extraction—Comparison of the Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Profile
title_full Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Plants at Various Growth Stages Subjected to Extraction—Comparison of the Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Profile
title_fullStr Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Plants at Various Growth Stages Subjected to Extraction—Comparison of the Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Profile
title_full_unstemmed Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Plants at Various Growth Stages Subjected to Extraction—Comparison of the Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Profile
title_short Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Plants at Various Growth Stages Subjected to Extraction—Comparison of the Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Profile
title_sort sunflower (helianthus annuus l.) plants at various growth stages subjected to extraction—comparison of the antioxidant activity and phenolic profile
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7346105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32575358
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox9060535
work_keys_str_mv AT gaifrancesco sunflowerhelianthusannuuslplantsatvariousgrowthstagessubjectedtoextractioncomparisonoftheantioxidantactivityandphenolicprofile
AT karamacmagdalena sunflowerhelianthusannuuslplantsatvariousgrowthstagessubjectedtoextractioncomparisonoftheantioxidantactivityandphenolicprofile
AT janiakmichała sunflowerhelianthusannuuslplantsatvariousgrowthstagessubjectedtoextractioncomparisonoftheantioxidantactivityandphenolicprofile
AT amarowiczryszard sunflowerhelianthusannuuslplantsatvariousgrowthstagessubjectedtoextractioncomparisonoftheantioxidantactivityandphenolicprofile
AT peirettipiergiorgio sunflowerhelianthusannuuslplantsatvariousgrowthstagessubjectedtoextractioncomparisonoftheantioxidantactivityandphenolicprofile