Cargando…
Impacts of chest compression cycle length and real-time feedback with a CPRmeter® on chest compression quality in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled factorial plan trial
BACKGROUND: With a survival rate of 6 to 11%, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a healthcare challenge with room for improvement in morbidity and mortality. The guidelines emphasize the highest possible quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and chest compressions (CC). It is ess...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7346361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32641090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04536-3 |
_version_ | 1783556392103182336 |
---|---|
author | Buléon, Clément Parienti, Jean-Jacques Morilland-Lecoq, Elodie Halbout, Laurent Cesaréo, Eric Dubien, Pierre-Yves Jardel, Benoit Boyer, Christophe Husson, Kévin Andriamirado, Florian Benet, Xavier Morel-Marechal, Emmanuel Aubrion, Antoine Muntean, Catalin Dupire, Erwan Roupie, Eric Hubert, Hervé Vilhelm, Christian Gueugniaud, Pierre-Yves |
author_facet | Buléon, Clément Parienti, Jean-Jacques Morilland-Lecoq, Elodie Halbout, Laurent Cesaréo, Eric Dubien, Pierre-Yves Jardel, Benoit Boyer, Christophe Husson, Kévin Andriamirado, Florian Benet, Xavier Morel-Marechal, Emmanuel Aubrion, Antoine Muntean, Catalin Dupire, Erwan Roupie, Eric Hubert, Hervé Vilhelm, Christian Gueugniaud, Pierre-Yves |
author_sort | Buléon, Clément |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With a survival rate of 6 to 11%, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a healthcare challenge with room for improvement in morbidity and mortality. The guidelines emphasize the highest possible quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and chest compressions (CC). It is essential to minimize CC interruptions, and therefore increase the chest compression fraction (CCF), as this is an independent factor for survival. Survival is significantly and positively correlated with the suitability of CCF targets, CC frequency, CC depth, and brief predefibrillation pause. CC guidance improves adherence to recommendations and allows closer alignment with the CC objectives. The possibility of improving CCF by lengthening the time between two CC relays and the effect of real-time feedback on the quality of the CC must be investigated. METHODS: Using a 2 × 2 factorial design in a multicenter randomized trial, two hypotheses will be tested simultaneously: (i) a 4-min relay rhythm improves the CCF (reducing the no-flow time) compared to the currently recommended 2-min relay rate, and (ii) a guiding tool improves the quality of CC. Primary outcomes (i) CCF and (ii) correct compression score will be recorded by a real-time feedback device. Five hundred adult nontraumatic OHCAs will be included over 2 years. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1:1 distribution receiving advanced CPR as follows: 2-min blind, 2 min with guidance, 4-min blind, or 4 min with guidance. Secondary outcomes are the depth, frequency, and release of CC; length (care, no-flow, and low-flow); rate of return of spontaneous circulation; characteristics of advanced CPR; survival at hospital admission; survival and neurological state on days 1 and 30 (or intensive care discharge); and dosage of neuron-specific enolase on days 1 and 3. DISCUSSION: This study will contribute to assessing the impact of real-time feedback on CC quality in practical conditions of OHCA resuscitation. It will also provide insight into the feasibility of extending the relay rhythm between two rescuers from the currently recommended 2 to 4 min. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03817892. Registered on 28 January 2019 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7346361 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73463612020-07-14 Impacts of chest compression cycle length and real-time feedback with a CPRmeter® on chest compression quality in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled factorial plan trial Buléon, Clément Parienti, Jean-Jacques Morilland-Lecoq, Elodie Halbout, Laurent Cesaréo, Eric Dubien, Pierre-Yves Jardel, Benoit Boyer, Christophe Husson, Kévin Andriamirado, Florian Benet, Xavier Morel-Marechal, Emmanuel Aubrion, Antoine Muntean, Catalin Dupire, Erwan Roupie, Eric Hubert, Hervé Vilhelm, Christian Gueugniaud, Pierre-Yves Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: With a survival rate of 6 to 11%, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a healthcare challenge with room for improvement in morbidity and mortality. The guidelines emphasize the highest possible quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and chest compressions (CC). It is essential to minimize CC interruptions, and therefore increase the chest compression fraction (CCF), as this is an independent factor for survival. Survival is significantly and positively correlated with the suitability of CCF targets, CC frequency, CC depth, and brief predefibrillation pause. CC guidance improves adherence to recommendations and allows closer alignment with the CC objectives. The possibility of improving CCF by lengthening the time between two CC relays and the effect of real-time feedback on the quality of the CC must be investigated. METHODS: Using a 2 × 2 factorial design in a multicenter randomized trial, two hypotheses will be tested simultaneously: (i) a 4-min relay rhythm improves the CCF (reducing the no-flow time) compared to the currently recommended 2-min relay rate, and (ii) a guiding tool improves the quality of CC. Primary outcomes (i) CCF and (ii) correct compression score will be recorded by a real-time feedback device. Five hundred adult nontraumatic OHCAs will be included over 2 years. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1:1 distribution receiving advanced CPR as follows: 2-min blind, 2 min with guidance, 4-min blind, or 4 min with guidance. Secondary outcomes are the depth, frequency, and release of CC; length (care, no-flow, and low-flow); rate of return of spontaneous circulation; characteristics of advanced CPR; survival at hospital admission; survival and neurological state on days 1 and 30 (or intensive care discharge); and dosage of neuron-specific enolase on days 1 and 3. DISCUSSION: This study will contribute to assessing the impact of real-time feedback on CC quality in practical conditions of OHCA resuscitation. It will also provide insight into the feasibility of extending the relay rhythm between two rescuers from the currently recommended 2 to 4 min. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03817892. Registered on 28 January 2019 BioMed Central 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7346361/ /pubmed/32641090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04536-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Buléon, Clément Parienti, Jean-Jacques Morilland-Lecoq, Elodie Halbout, Laurent Cesaréo, Eric Dubien, Pierre-Yves Jardel, Benoit Boyer, Christophe Husson, Kévin Andriamirado, Florian Benet, Xavier Morel-Marechal, Emmanuel Aubrion, Antoine Muntean, Catalin Dupire, Erwan Roupie, Eric Hubert, Hervé Vilhelm, Christian Gueugniaud, Pierre-Yves Impacts of chest compression cycle length and real-time feedback with a CPRmeter® on chest compression quality in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled factorial plan trial |
title | Impacts of chest compression cycle length and real-time feedback with a CPRmeter® on chest compression quality in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled factorial plan trial |
title_full | Impacts of chest compression cycle length and real-time feedback with a CPRmeter® on chest compression quality in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled factorial plan trial |
title_fullStr | Impacts of chest compression cycle length and real-time feedback with a CPRmeter® on chest compression quality in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled factorial plan trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Impacts of chest compression cycle length and real-time feedback with a CPRmeter® on chest compression quality in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled factorial plan trial |
title_short | Impacts of chest compression cycle length and real-time feedback with a CPRmeter® on chest compression quality in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled factorial plan trial |
title_sort | impacts of chest compression cycle length and real-time feedback with a cprmeter® on chest compression quality in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled factorial plan trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7346361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32641090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04536-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buleonclement impactsofchestcompressioncyclelengthandrealtimefeedbackwithacprmeteronchestcompressionqualityinoutofhospitalcardiacarreststudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledfactorialplantrial AT parientijeanjacques impactsofchestcompressioncyclelengthandrealtimefeedbackwithacprmeteronchestcompressionqualityinoutofhospitalcardiacarreststudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledfactorialplantrial AT morillandlecoqelodie impactsofchestcompressioncyclelengthandrealtimefeedbackwithacprmeteronchestcompressionqualityinoutofhospitalcardiacarreststudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledfactorialplantrial AT halboutlaurent impactsofchestcompressioncyclelengthandrealtimefeedbackwithacprmeteronchestcompressionqualityinoutofhospitalcardiacarreststudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledfactorialplantrial AT cesareoeric impactsofchestcompressioncyclelengthandrealtimefeedbackwithacprmeteronchestcompressionqualityinoutofhospitalcardiacarreststudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledfactorialplantrial AT dubienpierreyves impactsofchestcompressioncyclelengthandrealtimefeedbackwithacprmeteronchestcompressionqualityinoutofhospitalcardiacarreststudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledfactorialplantrial AT jardelbenoit impactsofchestcompressioncyclelengthandrealtimefeedbackwithacprmeteronchestcompressionqualityinoutofhospitalcardiacarreststudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledfactorialplantrial AT boyerchristophe impactsofchestcompressioncyclelengthandrealtimefeedbackwithacprmeteronchestcompressionqualityinoutofhospitalcardiacarreststudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledfactorialplantrial AT hussonkevin impactsofchestcompressioncyclelengthandrealtimefeedbackwithacprmeteronchestcompressionqualityinoutofhospitalcardiacarreststudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledfactorialplantrial AT andriamiradoflorian impactsofchestcompressioncyclelengthandrealtimefeedbackwithacprmeteronchestcompressionqualityinoutofhospitalcardiacarreststudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledfactorialplantrial AT benetxavier impactsofchestcompressioncyclelengthandrealtimefeedbackwithacprmeteronchestcompressionqualityinoutofhospitalcardiacarreststudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledfactorialplantrial AT morelmarechalemmanuel impactsofchestcompressioncyclelengthandrealtimefeedbackwithacprmeteronchestcompressionqualityinoutofhospitalcardiacarreststudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledfactorialplantrial AT aubrionantoine impactsofchestcompressioncyclelengthandrealtimefeedbackwithacprmeteronchestcompressionqualityinoutofhospitalcardiacarreststudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledfactorialplantrial AT munteancatalin impactsofchestcompressioncyclelengthandrealtimefeedbackwithacprmeteronchestcompressionqualityinoutofhospitalcardiacarreststudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledfactorialplantrial AT dupireerwan impactsofchestcompressioncyclelengthandrealtimefeedbackwithacprmeteronchestcompressionqualityinoutofhospitalcardiacarreststudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledfactorialplantrial AT roupieeric impactsofchestcompressioncyclelengthandrealtimefeedbackwithacprmeteronchestcompressionqualityinoutofhospitalcardiacarreststudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledfactorialplantrial AT hubertherve impactsofchestcompressioncyclelengthandrealtimefeedbackwithacprmeteronchestcompressionqualityinoutofhospitalcardiacarreststudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledfactorialplantrial AT vilhelmchristian impactsofchestcompressioncyclelengthandrealtimefeedbackwithacprmeteronchestcompressionqualityinoutofhospitalcardiacarreststudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledfactorialplantrial AT gueugniaudpierreyves impactsofchestcompressioncyclelengthandrealtimefeedbackwithacprmeteronchestcompressionqualityinoutofhospitalcardiacarreststudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledfactorialplantrial AT impactsofchestcompressioncyclelengthandrealtimefeedbackwithacprmeteronchestcompressionqualityinoutofhospitalcardiacarreststudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledfactorialplantrial |