Cargando…
Protocol for a randomized controlled trial to assess two procedures of vaginal native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse at the time of the questioning on vaginal prosthesis: the TAPP trial
BACKGROUND: Native tissue cystocele repair has been the cornerstone of prolapse surgery, especially since the learned societies warned clinicians and patients about serious mesh-related complications. Surgical techniques mainly consist in anterior colporraphy and vaginal patch plastron. However, suc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7346411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32641096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04512-x |
_version_ | 1783556401825579008 |
---|---|
author | Lacorre, A. Vidal, F. Campagne-Loiseau, S. Marin, B. Aubard, Y. Siegerth, F. Mesnard, C. Chantalat, E. Hocke, C. Gauthier, T. |
author_facet | Lacorre, A. Vidal, F. Campagne-Loiseau, S. Marin, B. Aubard, Y. Siegerth, F. Mesnard, C. Chantalat, E. Hocke, C. Gauthier, T. |
author_sort | Lacorre, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Native tissue cystocele repair has been the cornerstone of prolapse surgery, especially since the learned societies warned clinicians and patients about serious mesh-related complications. Surgical techniques mainly consist in anterior colporraphy and vaginal patch plastron. However, success rates of native tissue cystocele repair are heterogeneous, depending on the design of studies and definition of outcomes. To date, high-quality data comparing vaginal native tissue procedures are still lacking. METHODS: Herein we aimed to describe the design of the first randomized controlled trial (TAPP) comparing anterior colporraphy (plication of the muscularis and adventitial layers of the vaginal wall) and vaginal patch plastron (bladder support anchored on the tendinous arch of the pelvic fascia by lateral sutures) techniques. Our aim is to assess the effectiveness of vaginal native tissue repair at 1 year for cystocele with a combined definition of success—anatomic and functional. The primary endpoint will be the success rate 1 year after surgery with a composite of objective and subjective measures (Aa and Ba points < 0 from POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System) and a negative answer to question 3 of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and no need for additional treatment). DISCUSSION: A prospective study has found a success rate at 35% for anterior colporraphy based on a combined definition, both anatomic and functional, as recently recommended. However, the definition of anatomic was strict (POP-Q< 2), while it seems that the best definition of anatomic success is “no prolapse among the hymen”, that is to say Aa and Ba points from the POP-Q classification < 0. We hypothesize that vaginal patch plastron will have a better anatomic and functional success comparatively to anterior colporraphy because native tissue is added, as it corrects both median and lateral cystoceles thanks to bilateral paravaginal suspension. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CHU LIMOGES is the sponsor of this research (n°87RI18_0013). This research is supported by the French Department of Health (PHRC 2018-A03476-49) and will be conducted with the support of DGOS (PHRC interregional – GIRCI SOHO). The study protocol was approved by the Human Subjects Protection Review Board (Comité de Protection des Personnes) on May 16, 2019. The trial is registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT03875989). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7346411 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73464112020-07-14 Protocol for a randomized controlled trial to assess two procedures of vaginal native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse at the time of the questioning on vaginal prosthesis: the TAPP trial Lacorre, A. Vidal, F. Campagne-Loiseau, S. Marin, B. Aubard, Y. Siegerth, F. Mesnard, C. Chantalat, E. Hocke, C. Gauthier, T. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Native tissue cystocele repair has been the cornerstone of prolapse surgery, especially since the learned societies warned clinicians and patients about serious mesh-related complications. Surgical techniques mainly consist in anterior colporraphy and vaginal patch plastron. However, success rates of native tissue cystocele repair are heterogeneous, depending on the design of studies and definition of outcomes. To date, high-quality data comparing vaginal native tissue procedures are still lacking. METHODS: Herein we aimed to describe the design of the first randomized controlled trial (TAPP) comparing anterior colporraphy (plication of the muscularis and adventitial layers of the vaginal wall) and vaginal patch plastron (bladder support anchored on the tendinous arch of the pelvic fascia by lateral sutures) techniques. Our aim is to assess the effectiveness of vaginal native tissue repair at 1 year for cystocele with a combined definition of success—anatomic and functional. The primary endpoint will be the success rate 1 year after surgery with a composite of objective and subjective measures (Aa and Ba points < 0 from POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System) and a negative answer to question 3 of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and no need for additional treatment). DISCUSSION: A prospective study has found a success rate at 35% for anterior colporraphy based on a combined definition, both anatomic and functional, as recently recommended. However, the definition of anatomic was strict (POP-Q< 2), while it seems that the best definition of anatomic success is “no prolapse among the hymen”, that is to say Aa and Ba points from the POP-Q classification < 0. We hypothesize that vaginal patch plastron will have a better anatomic and functional success comparatively to anterior colporraphy because native tissue is added, as it corrects both median and lateral cystoceles thanks to bilateral paravaginal suspension. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CHU LIMOGES is the sponsor of this research (n°87RI18_0013). This research is supported by the French Department of Health (PHRC 2018-A03476-49) and will be conducted with the support of DGOS (PHRC interregional – GIRCI SOHO). The study protocol was approved by the Human Subjects Protection Review Board (Comité de Protection des Personnes) on May 16, 2019. The trial is registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT03875989). BioMed Central 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7346411/ /pubmed/32641096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04512-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Lacorre, A. Vidal, F. Campagne-Loiseau, S. Marin, B. Aubard, Y. Siegerth, F. Mesnard, C. Chantalat, E. Hocke, C. Gauthier, T. Protocol for a randomized controlled trial to assess two procedures of vaginal native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse at the time of the questioning on vaginal prosthesis: the TAPP trial |
title | Protocol for a randomized controlled trial to assess two procedures of vaginal native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse at the time of the questioning on vaginal prosthesis: the TAPP trial |
title_full | Protocol for a randomized controlled trial to assess two procedures of vaginal native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse at the time of the questioning on vaginal prosthesis: the TAPP trial |
title_fullStr | Protocol for a randomized controlled trial to assess two procedures of vaginal native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse at the time of the questioning on vaginal prosthesis: the TAPP trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Protocol for a randomized controlled trial to assess two procedures of vaginal native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse at the time of the questioning on vaginal prosthesis: the TAPP trial |
title_short | Protocol for a randomized controlled trial to assess two procedures of vaginal native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse at the time of the questioning on vaginal prosthesis: the TAPP trial |
title_sort | protocol for a randomized controlled trial to assess two procedures of vaginal native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse at the time of the questioning on vaginal prosthesis: the tapp trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7346411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32641096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04512-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lacorrea protocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialtoassesstwoproceduresofvaginalnativetissuerepairforpelvicorganprolapseatthetimeofthequestioningonvaginalprosthesisthetapptrial AT vidalf protocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialtoassesstwoproceduresofvaginalnativetissuerepairforpelvicorganprolapseatthetimeofthequestioningonvaginalprosthesisthetapptrial AT campagneloiseaus protocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialtoassesstwoproceduresofvaginalnativetissuerepairforpelvicorganprolapseatthetimeofthequestioningonvaginalprosthesisthetapptrial AT marinb protocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialtoassesstwoproceduresofvaginalnativetissuerepairforpelvicorganprolapseatthetimeofthequestioningonvaginalprosthesisthetapptrial AT aubardy protocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialtoassesstwoproceduresofvaginalnativetissuerepairforpelvicorganprolapseatthetimeofthequestioningonvaginalprosthesisthetapptrial AT siegerthf protocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialtoassesstwoproceduresofvaginalnativetissuerepairforpelvicorganprolapseatthetimeofthequestioningonvaginalprosthesisthetapptrial AT mesnardc protocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialtoassesstwoproceduresofvaginalnativetissuerepairforpelvicorganprolapseatthetimeofthequestioningonvaginalprosthesisthetapptrial AT chantalate protocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialtoassesstwoproceduresofvaginalnativetissuerepairforpelvicorganprolapseatthetimeofthequestioningonvaginalprosthesisthetapptrial AT hockec protocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialtoassesstwoproceduresofvaginalnativetissuerepairforpelvicorganprolapseatthetimeofthequestioningonvaginalprosthesisthetapptrial AT gauthiert protocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialtoassesstwoproceduresofvaginalnativetissuerepairforpelvicorganprolapseatthetimeofthequestioningonvaginalprosthesisthetapptrial |