Cargando…

Harnessing repeated measurements of predictor variables for clinical risk prediction: a review of existing methods

BACKGROUND: Clinical prediction models (CPMs) predict the risk of health outcomes for individual patients. The majority of existing CPMs only harness cross-sectional patient information. Incorporating repeated measurements, such as those stored in electronic health records, into CPMs may provide an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bull, Lucy M., Lunt, Mark, Martin, Glen P., Hyrich, Kimme, Sergeant, Jamie C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7346415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32671229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-020-00078-z
_version_ 1783556402772443136
author Bull, Lucy M.
Lunt, Mark
Martin, Glen P.
Hyrich, Kimme
Sergeant, Jamie C.
author_facet Bull, Lucy M.
Lunt, Mark
Martin, Glen P.
Hyrich, Kimme
Sergeant, Jamie C.
author_sort Bull, Lucy M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical prediction models (CPMs) predict the risk of health outcomes for individual patients. The majority of existing CPMs only harness cross-sectional patient information. Incorporating repeated measurements, such as those stored in electronic health records, into CPMs may provide an opportunity to enhance their performance. However, the number and complexity of methodological approaches available could make it difficult for researchers to explore this opportunity. Our objective was to review the literature and summarise existing approaches for harnessing repeated measurements of predictor variables in CPMs, primarily to make this field more accessible for applied researchers. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science were searched for articles reporting the development of a multivariable CPM for individual-level prediction of future binary or time-to-event outcomes and modelling repeated measurements of at least one predictor. Information was extracted on the following: the methodology used, its specific aim, reported advantages and limitations, and software available to apply the method. RESULTS: The search revealed 217 relevant articles. Seven methodological frameworks were identified: time-dependent covariate modelling, generalised estimating equations, landmark analysis, two-stage modelling, joint-modelling, trajectory classification and machine learning. Each of these frameworks satisfies at least one of three aims: to better represent the predictor-outcome relationship over time, to infer a covariate value at a pre-specified time and to account for the effect of covariate change. CONCLUSIONS: The applicability of identified methods depends on the motivation for including longitudinal information and the method’s compatibility with the clinical context and available patient data, for both model development and risk estimation in practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7346415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73464152020-07-14 Harnessing repeated measurements of predictor variables for clinical risk prediction: a review of existing methods Bull, Lucy M. Lunt, Mark Martin, Glen P. Hyrich, Kimme Sergeant, Jamie C. Diagn Progn Res Review BACKGROUND: Clinical prediction models (CPMs) predict the risk of health outcomes for individual patients. The majority of existing CPMs only harness cross-sectional patient information. Incorporating repeated measurements, such as those stored in electronic health records, into CPMs may provide an opportunity to enhance their performance. However, the number and complexity of methodological approaches available could make it difficult for researchers to explore this opportunity. Our objective was to review the literature and summarise existing approaches for harnessing repeated measurements of predictor variables in CPMs, primarily to make this field more accessible for applied researchers. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science were searched for articles reporting the development of a multivariable CPM for individual-level prediction of future binary or time-to-event outcomes and modelling repeated measurements of at least one predictor. Information was extracted on the following: the methodology used, its specific aim, reported advantages and limitations, and software available to apply the method. RESULTS: The search revealed 217 relevant articles. Seven methodological frameworks were identified: time-dependent covariate modelling, generalised estimating equations, landmark analysis, two-stage modelling, joint-modelling, trajectory classification and machine learning. Each of these frameworks satisfies at least one of three aims: to better represent the predictor-outcome relationship over time, to infer a covariate value at a pre-specified time and to account for the effect of covariate change. CONCLUSIONS: The applicability of identified methods depends on the motivation for including longitudinal information and the method’s compatibility with the clinical context and available patient data, for both model development and risk estimation in practice. BioMed Central 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7346415/ /pubmed/32671229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-020-00078-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Bull, Lucy M.
Lunt, Mark
Martin, Glen P.
Hyrich, Kimme
Sergeant, Jamie C.
Harnessing repeated measurements of predictor variables for clinical risk prediction: a review of existing methods
title Harnessing repeated measurements of predictor variables for clinical risk prediction: a review of existing methods
title_full Harnessing repeated measurements of predictor variables for clinical risk prediction: a review of existing methods
title_fullStr Harnessing repeated measurements of predictor variables for clinical risk prediction: a review of existing methods
title_full_unstemmed Harnessing repeated measurements of predictor variables for clinical risk prediction: a review of existing methods
title_short Harnessing repeated measurements of predictor variables for clinical risk prediction: a review of existing methods
title_sort harnessing repeated measurements of predictor variables for clinical risk prediction: a review of existing methods
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7346415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32671229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-020-00078-z
work_keys_str_mv AT bulllucym harnessingrepeatedmeasurementsofpredictorvariablesforclinicalriskpredictionareviewofexistingmethods
AT luntmark harnessingrepeatedmeasurementsofpredictorvariablesforclinicalriskpredictionareviewofexistingmethods
AT martinglenp harnessingrepeatedmeasurementsofpredictorvariablesforclinicalriskpredictionareviewofexistingmethods
AT hyrichkimme harnessingrepeatedmeasurementsofpredictorvariablesforclinicalriskpredictionareviewofexistingmethods
AT sergeantjamiec harnessingrepeatedmeasurementsofpredictorvariablesforclinicalriskpredictionareviewofexistingmethods