Cargando…
The cost-effectiveness of controlling dengue in Indonesia using wMel Wolbachia released at scale: a modelling study
BACKGROUND: Release of virus-blocking Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes is an emerging disease control strategy that aims to control dengue and other arboviral infections. Early entomological data and modelling analyses have suggested promising outcomes, and wMel Wolbachia releases are now ongoing or pl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7346418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32641039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01638-2 |
_version_ | 1783556403495960576 |
---|---|
author | Brady, Oliver J. Kharisma, Dinar D. Wilastonegoro, Nandyan N. O’Reilly, Kathleen M. Hendrickx, Emilie Bastos, Leonardo S. Yakob, Laith Shepard, Donald S. |
author_facet | Brady, Oliver J. Kharisma, Dinar D. Wilastonegoro, Nandyan N. O’Reilly, Kathleen M. Hendrickx, Emilie Bastos, Leonardo S. Yakob, Laith Shepard, Donald S. |
author_sort | Brady, Oliver J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Release of virus-blocking Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes is an emerging disease control strategy that aims to control dengue and other arboviral infections. Early entomological data and modelling analyses have suggested promising outcomes, and wMel Wolbachia releases are now ongoing or planned in 12 countries. To help inform government, donor, or philanthropist decisions on scale-up beyond single city releases, we assessed this technology’s cost-effectiveness under alternative programmatic options. METHODS: Using costing data from existing Wolbachia releases, previous dynamic model-based estimates of Wolbachia effectiveness, and a spatially explicit model of release and surveillance requirements, we predicted the costs and effectiveness of the ongoing programme in Yogyakarta City and three new hypothetical programmes in Yogyakarta Special Autonomous Region, Jakarta, and Bali. RESULTS: We predicted Wolbachia to be a highly cost-effective intervention when deployed in high-density urban areas with gross cost-effectiveness below $1500 per DALY averted. When offsets from the health system and societal perspective were included, such programmes even became cost saving over 10-year time horizons with favourable benefit-cost ratios of 1.35 to 3.40. Sequencing Wolbachia releases over 10 years could reduce programme costs by approximately 38% compared to simultaneous releases everywhere, but also delays the benefits. Even if unexpected challenges occurred during deployment, such as emergence of resistance in the medium-term or low effective coverage, Wolbachia would remain a cost-saving intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Wolbachia releases in high-density urban areas are expected to be highly cost-effective and could potentially be the first cost-saving intervention for dengue. Sites with strong public health infrastructure, fiscal capacity, and community support should be prioritised. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7346418 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73464182020-07-14 The cost-effectiveness of controlling dengue in Indonesia using wMel Wolbachia released at scale: a modelling study Brady, Oliver J. Kharisma, Dinar D. Wilastonegoro, Nandyan N. O’Reilly, Kathleen M. Hendrickx, Emilie Bastos, Leonardo S. Yakob, Laith Shepard, Donald S. BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Release of virus-blocking Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes is an emerging disease control strategy that aims to control dengue and other arboviral infections. Early entomological data and modelling analyses have suggested promising outcomes, and wMel Wolbachia releases are now ongoing or planned in 12 countries. To help inform government, donor, or philanthropist decisions on scale-up beyond single city releases, we assessed this technology’s cost-effectiveness under alternative programmatic options. METHODS: Using costing data from existing Wolbachia releases, previous dynamic model-based estimates of Wolbachia effectiveness, and a spatially explicit model of release and surveillance requirements, we predicted the costs and effectiveness of the ongoing programme in Yogyakarta City and three new hypothetical programmes in Yogyakarta Special Autonomous Region, Jakarta, and Bali. RESULTS: We predicted Wolbachia to be a highly cost-effective intervention when deployed in high-density urban areas with gross cost-effectiveness below $1500 per DALY averted. When offsets from the health system and societal perspective were included, such programmes even became cost saving over 10-year time horizons with favourable benefit-cost ratios of 1.35 to 3.40. Sequencing Wolbachia releases over 10 years could reduce programme costs by approximately 38% compared to simultaneous releases everywhere, but also delays the benefits. Even if unexpected challenges occurred during deployment, such as emergence of resistance in the medium-term or low effective coverage, Wolbachia would remain a cost-saving intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Wolbachia releases in high-density urban areas are expected to be highly cost-effective and could potentially be the first cost-saving intervention for dengue. Sites with strong public health infrastructure, fiscal capacity, and community support should be prioritised. BioMed Central 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7346418/ /pubmed/32641039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01638-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Brady, Oliver J. Kharisma, Dinar D. Wilastonegoro, Nandyan N. O’Reilly, Kathleen M. Hendrickx, Emilie Bastos, Leonardo S. Yakob, Laith Shepard, Donald S. The cost-effectiveness of controlling dengue in Indonesia using wMel Wolbachia released at scale: a modelling study |
title | The cost-effectiveness of controlling dengue in Indonesia using wMel Wolbachia released at scale: a modelling study |
title_full | The cost-effectiveness of controlling dengue in Indonesia using wMel Wolbachia released at scale: a modelling study |
title_fullStr | The cost-effectiveness of controlling dengue in Indonesia using wMel Wolbachia released at scale: a modelling study |
title_full_unstemmed | The cost-effectiveness of controlling dengue in Indonesia using wMel Wolbachia released at scale: a modelling study |
title_short | The cost-effectiveness of controlling dengue in Indonesia using wMel Wolbachia released at scale: a modelling study |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of controlling dengue in indonesia using wmel wolbachia released at scale: a modelling study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7346418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32641039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01638-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bradyoliverj thecosteffectivenessofcontrollingdengueinindonesiausingwmelwolbachiareleasedatscaleamodellingstudy AT kharismadinard thecosteffectivenessofcontrollingdengueinindonesiausingwmelwolbachiareleasedatscaleamodellingstudy AT wilastonegoronandyann thecosteffectivenessofcontrollingdengueinindonesiausingwmelwolbachiareleasedatscaleamodellingstudy AT oreillykathleenm thecosteffectivenessofcontrollingdengueinindonesiausingwmelwolbachiareleasedatscaleamodellingstudy AT hendrickxemilie thecosteffectivenessofcontrollingdengueinindonesiausingwmelwolbachiareleasedatscaleamodellingstudy AT bastosleonardos thecosteffectivenessofcontrollingdengueinindonesiausingwmelwolbachiareleasedatscaleamodellingstudy AT yakoblaith thecosteffectivenessofcontrollingdengueinindonesiausingwmelwolbachiareleasedatscaleamodellingstudy AT sheparddonalds thecosteffectivenessofcontrollingdengueinindonesiausingwmelwolbachiareleasedatscaleamodellingstudy AT bradyoliverj costeffectivenessofcontrollingdengueinindonesiausingwmelwolbachiareleasedatscaleamodellingstudy AT kharismadinard costeffectivenessofcontrollingdengueinindonesiausingwmelwolbachiareleasedatscaleamodellingstudy AT wilastonegoronandyann costeffectivenessofcontrollingdengueinindonesiausingwmelwolbachiareleasedatscaleamodellingstudy AT oreillykathleenm costeffectivenessofcontrollingdengueinindonesiausingwmelwolbachiareleasedatscaleamodellingstudy AT hendrickxemilie costeffectivenessofcontrollingdengueinindonesiausingwmelwolbachiareleasedatscaleamodellingstudy AT bastosleonardos costeffectivenessofcontrollingdengueinindonesiausingwmelwolbachiareleasedatscaleamodellingstudy AT yakoblaith costeffectivenessofcontrollingdengueinindonesiausingwmelwolbachiareleasedatscaleamodellingstudy AT sheparddonalds costeffectivenessofcontrollingdengueinindonesiausingwmelwolbachiareleasedatscaleamodellingstudy |