Cargando…

Assignment of pre-event ASA physical status classification by pre-hospital physicians: a prospective inter-rater reliability study

BACKGROUND: Individualized treatment is a common principle in hospitals. Treatment decisions are made based on the patient’s condition, including comorbidities. This principle is equally relevant out-of-hospital. Furthermore, comorbidity is an important risk-adjustment factor when evaluating pre-hos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tønsager, Kristin, Rehn, Marius, Krüger, Andreas J., Røislien, Jo, Ringdal, Kjetil G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7346504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32646386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01083-x
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Individualized treatment is a common principle in hospitals. Treatment decisions are made based on the patient’s condition, including comorbidities. This principle is equally relevant out-of-hospital. Furthermore, comorbidity is an important risk-adjustment factor when evaluating pre-hospital interventions and may aid therapeutic decisions and triage. The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) classification system is included in templates for reporting data in physician-staffed pre-hospital emergency medical services (p-EMS) but whether an adequate full pre-event ASA-PS can be assessed by pre-hospital physicians remains unknown. We aimed to explore whether pre-hospital physicians can score an adequate pre-event ASA-PS with the information available on-scene. METHODS: The study was an inter-rater reliability study consisting of two steps. Pre-event ASA-PS scores made by pre- and in-hospital physicians were compared. Pre-hospital physicians did not have access to patient records and scores were based on information obtainable on-scene. In-hospital physicians used the complete patient record (Step 1). To assess inter-rater reliability between pre- and in-hospital physicians when given equal amounts of information, pre-hospital physicians also assigned pre-event ASA-PS for 20 of the included patients by using the complete patient records (Step 2). Inter-rater reliability was analyzed using quadratic weighted Cohen’s kappa (κ(w)). RESULTS: For most scores (82%) inter-rater reliability between pre-and in-hospital physicians were moderate to substantial (κ(w) 0,47-0,89). Inter-rater reliability was higher among the in-hospital physicians (κ(w) 0,77 to 0.85). When all physicians had access to the same information, κ(w) increased (κ(w) 0,65 to 0,93). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-hospital physicians can score an adequate pre-event ASA-PS on-scene for most patients. To further increase inter-rater reliability, we recommend access to the full patient journal on-scene. We recommend application of the full ASA-PS classification system for reporting of comorbidity in p-EMS.