Cargando…
Model construction of medical endoscope service evaluation system-based on the analysis of Delphi method
BACKGROUND: Medical endoscope is widely used in clinical practice for the purpose of diagnosis and treatment, occupying around 5% of the medical device market. Evaluating the true service level of medical endoscope is essential and necessary to improve overall performance of medical diagnosis and tr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7346529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32646429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05486-x |
_version_ | 1783556426061316096 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, Jun Lou, Ligang Xie, Ying Chen, Siyao Li, Jun Wei, Jingming Feng, Jingyi |
author_facet | Zheng, Jun Lou, Ligang Xie, Ying Chen, Siyao Li, Jun Wei, Jingming Feng, Jingyi |
author_sort | Zheng, Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Medical endoscope is widely used in clinical practice for the purpose of diagnosis and treatment, occupying around 5% of the medical device market. Evaluating the true service level of medical endoscope is essential and necessary to improve overall performance of medical diagnosis and treatment, and to maintain competitiveness of endoscope manufacturers, however, such a tool is not available in the market. This study develops an Evaluation Index System (EIS) to assess service level of medical endoscope, and to provide suggestions for improving the service level through the Delphi method. METHODS: Firstly, the possible factors influencing the service level were identified from literature review. In parallel, the Delphi expert method questionnaire was designed and 25 experts were invited to conduct three rounds of questionnaire, to evaluate and rate the possible factors. Finally, we determined the weights associated with the factors, using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and percentage method, and developed the service level EIS. RESULTS: The EIS consists of 3 first-level indicators, 24 s-level indicators and 68 third-level indicators. According to the weights computed using AHP, first-level indicators are ranked as post-sale (0.62), in-sale (0.25) and pre-sale (0.13). Through case verification, the medical endoscope brand Olympus had a total score of 4.17, Shanghai Aohua had a total score of 3.71, and Shanghai Chengyun had a total score of 3.28, which matches its market popularity and ranking in terms of market share. The results obtained from the EIS are consistent with the reality. CONCLUSIONS: The EIS established in this study is comprehensive, reliable and reasonable with strong practicality. The EIS can act as a tool for the endoscope users to evaluate potential products and make informed choices. It also provides a measurable basis for endoscope manufacturers and service providers to improve service quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7346529 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73465292020-07-14 Model construction of medical endoscope service evaluation system-based on the analysis of Delphi method Zheng, Jun Lou, Ligang Xie, Ying Chen, Siyao Li, Jun Wei, Jingming Feng, Jingyi BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Medical endoscope is widely used in clinical practice for the purpose of diagnosis and treatment, occupying around 5% of the medical device market. Evaluating the true service level of medical endoscope is essential and necessary to improve overall performance of medical diagnosis and treatment, and to maintain competitiveness of endoscope manufacturers, however, such a tool is not available in the market. This study develops an Evaluation Index System (EIS) to assess service level of medical endoscope, and to provide suggestions for improving the service level through the Delphi method. METHODS: Firstly, the possible factors influencing the service level were identified from literature review. In parallel, the Delphi expert method questionnaire was designed and 25 experts were invited to conduct three rounds of questionnaire, to evaluate and rate the possible factors. Finally, we determined the weights associated with the factors, using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and percentage method, and developed the service level EIS. RESULTS: The EIS consists of 3 first-level indicators, 24 s-level indicators and 68 third-level indicators. According to the weights computed using AHP, first-level indicators are ranked as post-sale (0.62), in-sale (0.25) and pre-sale (0.13). Through case verification, the medical endoscope brand Olympus had a total score of 4.17, Shanghai Aohua had a total score of 3.71, and Shanghai Chengyun had a total score of 3.28, which matches its market popularity and ranking in terms of market share. The results obtained from the EIS are consistent with the reality. CONCLUSIONS: The EIS established in this study is comprehensive, reliable and reasonable with strong practicality. The EIS can act as a tool for the endoscope users to evaluate potential products and make informed choices. It also provides a measurable basis for endoscope manufacturers and service providers to improve service quality. BioMed Central 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7346529/ /pubmed/32646429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05486-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zheng, Jun Lou, Ligang Xie, Ying Chen, Siyao Li, Jun Wei, Jingming Feng, Jingyi Model construction of medical endoscope service evaluation system-based on the analysis of Delphi method |
title | Model construction of medical endoscope service evaluation system-based on the analysis of Delphi method |
title_full | Model construction of medical endoscope service evaluation system-based on the analysis of Delphi method |
title_fullStr | Model construction of medical endoscope service evaluation system-based on the analysis of Delphi method |
title_full_unstemmed | Model construction of medical endoscope service evaluation system-based on the analysis of Delphi method |
title_short | Model construction of medical endoscope service evaluation system-based on the analysis of Delphi method |
title_sort | model construction of medical endoscope service evaluation system-based on the analysis of delphi method |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7346529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32646429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05486-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhengjun modelconstructionofmedicalendoscopeserviceevaluationsystembasedontheanalysisofdelphimethod AT louligang modelconstructionofmedicalendoscopeserviceevaluationsystembasedontheanalysisofdelphimethod AT xieying modelconstructionofmedicalendoscopeserviceevaluationsystembasedontheanalysisofdelphimethod AT chensiyao modelconstructionofmedicalendoscopeserviceevaluationsystembasedontheanalysisofdelphimethod AT lijun modelconstructionofmedicalendoscopeserviceevaluationsystembasedontheanalysisofdelphimethod AT weijingming modelconstructionofmedicalendoscopeserviceevaluationsystembasedontheanalysisofdelphimethod AT fengjingyi modelconstructionofmedicalendoscopeserviceevaluationsystembasedontheanalysisofdelphimethod |