Cargando…
Protocol for Take-home naloxone In Multicentre Emergency (TIME) settings: feasibility study
BACKGROUND: Opioids, such as heroin, kill more people worldwide by overdose than any other type of drug, and death rates associated with opioid poisoning in the UK are at record levels (World Drug Report 2018 [Internet]. [cited 2019 Nov 19]. Available from: http://www.unodc.org/wdr2018/; Deaths rela...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7346647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32670598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00626-w |
_version_ | 1783556438961946624 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Matthew Bell, Fiona Benger, Jonathan Black, Sarah Buykx, Penny Dixon, Simon Driscoll, Tim Evans, Bridie Edwards, Adrian Fuller, Gordon Goodacre, Steve Hoskins, Rebecca Hughes, Jane John, Ann Jones, Jenna Moore, Chris Sampson, Fiona Watkins, Alan Snooks, Helen |
author_facet | Jones, Matthew Bell, Fiona Benger, Jonathan Black, Sarah Buykx, Penny Dixon, Simon Driscoll, Tim Evans, Bridie Edwards, Adrian Fuller, Gordon Goodacre, Steve Hoskins, Rebecca Hughes, Jane John, Ann Jones, Jenna Moore, Chris Sampson, Fiona Watkins, Alan Snooks, Helen |
author_sort | Jones, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Opioids, such as heroin, kill more people worldwide by overdose than any other type of drug, and death rates associated with opioid poisoning in the UK are at record levels (World Drug Report 2018 [Internet]. [cited 2019 Nov 19]. Available from: http://www.unodc.org/wdr2018/; Deaths related to drug poisoning in England and Wales - Office for National Statistics [Internet]. [cited 2019 Nov 19]. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsrelatedtodrugpoisoninginenglandandwales/2018registrations). Naloxone is an opioid antagonist which can be distributed in ‘kits’ for administration by witnesses in an overdose emergency. This intervention is known as take-home naloxone (THN). We know that THN can save lives on an individual level, but there is currently limited evidence about the effectiveness of THN distribution on an aggregate level, in specialist drug service settings or in emergency service settings. Notably, we do not know whether THN kits reduce deaths from opioid overdose in at-risk populations, if there are unforeseen harms associated with THN distribution or if THN is cost-effective. In order to address this research gap, we aim to determine the feasibility of a fully powered cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) of THN distribution in emergency settings. METHODS: We will carry out a feasibility study for a RCT of THN distributed in emergency settings at four sites, clustered by Emergency Department (ED) and catchment area within its associated ambulance service. THN is a peer-administered intervention. At two intervention sites, emergency ambulance paramedics and ED clinical staff will distribute THN to adult patients who are at risk of opioid overdose. At two control sites, practice will carry on as usual. We will develop a method of identifying a population to include in an evaluation, comprising people at risk of fatal opioid overdose, who may potentially receive naloxone included in a THN kit. We will gather anonymised outcomes up to 1 year following a 12-month ‘live’ trial period for patients at risk of death from opioid poisoning. We expect approximately 100 patients at risk of opioid overdose to be in contact with each service during the 1-year recruitment period. Our outcomes will include deaths, emergency admissions, intensive care admissions, and ED attendances. We will collect numbers of eligible patients attended by participating in emergency ambulance paramedics and attending ED, THN kits issued, and NHS resource usage. We will determine whether to progress to a fully powered trial based on pre-specified progression criteria: sign-up of sites (n = 4), staff trained (≥ 50%), eligible participants identified (≥ 50%), THN provided to eligible participants (≥ 50%), people at risk of death from opioid overdose identified for inclusion in follow-up (≥ 75% of overdose deaths), outcomes retrieved for high-risk individuals (≥ 75%), and adverse event rate (< 10% difference between study arms). DISCUSSION: This feasibility study is the first randomised, methodologically robust investigation of THN distribution in emergency settings. The study addresses an evidence gap related to the effectiveness of THN distribution in emergency settings. As this study is being carried out in emergency settings, obtaining informed consent on behalf of participants is not feasible. We therefore employ novel methods for identifying participants and capturing follow-up data, with effectiveness dependent on the quality of the available routine data. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN13232859 (Registered 16/02/2018) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7346647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73466472020-07-14 Protocol for Take-home naloxone In Multicentre Emergency (TIME) settings: feasibility study Jones, Matthew Bell, Fiona Benger, Jonathan Black, Sarah Buykx, Penny Dixon, Simon Driscoll, Tim Evans, Bridie Edwards, Adrian Fuller, Gordon Goodacre, Steve Hoskins, Rebecca Hughes, Jane John, Ann Jones, Jenna Moore, Chris Sampson, Fiona Watkins, Alan Snooks, Helen Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Opioids, such as heroin, kill more people worldwide by overdose than any other type of drug, and death rates associated with opioid poisoning in the UK are at record levels (World Drug Report 2018 [Internet]. [cited 2019 Nov 19]. Available from: http://www.unodc.org/wdr2018/; Deaths related to drug poisoning in England and Wales - Office for National Statistics [Internet]. [cited 2019 Nov 19]. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsrelatedtodrugpoisoninginenglandandwales/2018registrations). Naloxone is an opioid antagonist which can be distributed in ‘kits’ for administration by witnesses in an overdose emergency. This intervention is known as take-home naloxone (THN). We know that THN can save lives on an individual level, but there is currently limited evidence about the effectiveness of THN distribution on an aggregate level, in specialist drug service settings or in emergency service settings. Notably, we do not know whether THN kits reduce deaths from opioid overdose in at-risk populations, if there are unforeseen harms associated with THN distribution or if THN is cost-effective. In order to address this research gap, we aim to determine the feasibility of a fully powered cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) of THN distribution in emergency settings. METHODS: We will carry out a feasibility study for a RCT of THN distributed in emergency settings at four sites, clustered by Emergency Department (ED) and catchment area within its associated ambulance service. THN is a peer-administered intervention. At two intervention sites, emergency ambulance paramedics and ED clinical staff will distribute THN to adult patients who are at risk of opioid overdose. At two control sites, practice will carry on as usual. We will develop a method of identifying a population to include in an evaluation, comprising people at risk of fatal opioid overdose, who may potentially receive naloxone included in a THN kit. We will gather anonymised outcomes up to 1 year following a 12-month ‘live’ trial period for patients at risk of death from opioid poisoning. We expect approximately 100 patients at risk of opioid overdose to be in contact with each service during the 1-year recruitment period. Our outcomes will include deaths, emergency admissions, intensive care admissions, and ED attendances. We will collect numbers of eligible patients attended by participating in emergency ambulance paramedics and attending ED, THN kits issued, and NHS resource usage. We will determine whether to progress to a fully powered trial based on pre-specified progression criteria: sign-up of sites (n = 4), staff trained (≥ 50%), eligible participants identified (≥ 50%), THN provided to eligible participants (≥ 50%), people at risk of death from opioid overdose identified for inclusion in follow-up (≥ 75% of overdose deaths), outcomes retrieved for high-risk individuals (≥ 75%), and adverse event rate (< 10% difference between study arms). DISCUSSION: This feasibility study is the first randomised, methodologically robust investigation of THN distribution in emergency settings. The study addresses an evidence gap related to the effectiveness of THN distribution in emergency settings. As this study is being carried out in emergency settings, obtaining informed consent on behalf of participants is not feasible. We therefore employ novel methods for identifying participants and capturing follow-up data, with effectiveness dependent on the quality of the available routine data. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN13232859 (Registered 16/02/2018) BioMed Central 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7346647/ /pubmed/32670598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00626-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Jones, Matthew Bell, Fiona Benger, Jonathan Black, Sarah Buykx, Penny Dixon, Simon Driscoll, Tim Evans, Bridie Edwards, Adrian Fuller, Gordon Goodacre, Steve Hoskins, Rebecca Hughes, Jane John, Ann Jones, Jenna Moore, Chris Sampson, Fiona Watkins, Alan Snooks, Helen Protocol for Take-home naloxone In Multicentre Emergency (TIME) settings: feasibility study |
title | Protocol for Take-home naloxone In Multicentre Emergency (TIME) settings: feasibility study |
title_full | Protocol for Take-home naloxone In Multicentre Emergency (TIME) settings: feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Protocol for Take-home naloxone In Multicentre Emergency (TIME) settings: feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Protocol for Take-home naloxone In Multicentre Emergency (TIME) settings: feasibility study |
title_short | Protocol for Take-home naloxone In Multicentre Emergency (TIME) settings: feasibility study |
title_sort | protocol for take-home naloxone in multicentre emergency (time) settings: feasibility study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7346647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32670598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00626-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonesmatthew protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT bellfiona protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT bengerjonathan protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT blacksarah protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT buykxpenny protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT dixonsimon protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT driscolltim protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT evansbridie protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT edwardsadrian protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT fullergordon protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT goodacresteve protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT hoskinsrebecca protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT hughesjane protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT johnann protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT jonesjenna protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT moorechris protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT sampsonfiona protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT watkinsalan protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy AT snookshelen protocolfortakehomenaloxoneinmulticentreemergencytimesettingsfeasibilitystudy |