Cargando…

Comparison of five Boosting-based models for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with limited meteorological variables

Accurate ET(0) estimation is of great significance in effective agricultural water management and realizing future intelligent irrigation. This study compares the performance of five Boosting-based models, including Adaptive Boosting(ADA), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree(GBDT), Extreme Gradient Boos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Tianao, Zhang, Wei, Jiao, Xiyun, Guo, Weihua, Hamoud, Yousef Alhaj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7347040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32598399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235324
_version_ 1783556518663159808
author Wu, Tianao
Zhang, Wei
Jiao, Xiyun
Guo, Weihua
Hamoud, Yousef Alhaj
author_facet Wu, Tianao
Zhang, Wei
Jiao, Xiyun
Guo, Weihua
Hamoud, Yousef Alhaj
author_sort Wu, Tianao
collection PubMed
description Accurate ET(0) estimation is of great significance in effective agricultural water management and realizing future intelligent irrigation. This study compares the performance of five Boosting-based models, including Adaptive Boosting(ADA), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree(GBDT), Extreme Gradient Boosting(XGB), Light Gradient Boosting Decision Machine(LGB) and Gradient boosting with categorical features support(CAT), for estimating daily ET(0) across 10 stations in the eastern monsoon zone of China. Six different input combinations and 10-fold cross validation method were considered for fully evaluating model accuracy and stability under the condition of limited meteorological variables input. Meanwhile, path analysis was used to analyze the effect of meteorological variables on daily ET(0) and their contribution to the estimation results. The results indicated that CAT models could achieve the highest accuracy (with global average RMSE of 0.5667 mm d(-1), MAE of 4199 mm d(-1)and Adj_R(2) of 0.8514) and best stability regardless of input combination and stations. Among the inputted meteorological variables, solar radiation(Rs) offers the largest contribution (with average value of 0.7703) to the R(2) value of the estimation results and its direct effect on ET(0) increases (ranging 0.8654 to 0.9090) as the station’s latitude goes down, while maximum temperature (T(max)) showes the contrary trend (ranging from 0.8598 to 0.5268). These results could help to optimize and simplify the variables contained in input combinations. The comparison between models based on the number of the day in a year (J) and extraterrestrial radiation (Ra) manifested that both J and Ra could improve the modeling accuracy and the improvement increased with the station’s latitudes. However, models with J could achieve better accuracy than those with Ra. In conclusion, CAT models can be most recommended for estimating ET(0) and input variable J can be promoted to improve model performance with limited meteorological variables in the eastern monsoon zone of China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7347040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73470402020-07-17 Comparison of five Boosting-based models for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with limited meteorological variables Wu, Tianao Zhang, Wei Jiao, Xiyun Guo, Weihua Hamoud, Yousef Alhaj PLoS One Research Article Accurate ET(0) estimation is of great significance in effective agricultural water management and realizing future intelligent irrigation. This study compares the performance of five Boosting-based models, including Adaptive Boosting(ADA), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree(GBDT), Extreme Gradient Boosting(XGB), Light Gradient Boosting Decision Machine(LGB) and Gradient boosting with categorical features support(CAT), for estimating daily ET(0) across 10 stations in the eastern monsoon zone of China. Six different input combinations and 10-fold cross validation method were considered for fully evaluating model accuracy and stability under the condition of limited meteorological variables input. Meanwhile, path analysis was used to analyze the effect of meteorological variables on daily ET(0) and their contribution to the estimation results. The results indicated that CAT models could achieve the highest accuracy (with global average RMSE of 0.5667 mm d(-1), MAE of 4199 mm d(-1)and Adj_R(2) of 0.8514) and best stability regardless of input combination and stations. Among the inputted meteorological variables, solar radiation(Rs) offers the largest contribution (with average value of 0.7703) to the R(2) value of the estimation results and its direct effect on ET(0) increases (ranging 0.8654 to 0.9090) as the station’s latitude goes down, while maximum temperature (T(max)) showes the contrary trend (ranging from 0.8598 to 0.5268). These results could help to optimize and simplify the variables contained in input combinations. The comparison between models based on the number of the day in a year (J) and extraterrestrial radiation (Ra) manifested that both J and Ra could improve the modeling accuracy and the improvement increased with the station’s latitudes. However, models with J could achieve better accuracy than those with Ra. In conclusion, CAT models can be most recommended for estimating ET(0) and input variable J can be promoted to improve model performance with limited meteorological variables in the eastern monsoon zone of China. Public Library of Science 2020-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7347040/ /pubmed/32598399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235324 Text en © 2020 Wu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wu, Tianao
Zhang, Wei
Jiao, Xiyun
Guo, Weihua
Hamoud, Yousef Alhaj
Comparison of five Boosting-based models for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with limited meteorological variables
title Comparison of five Boosting-based models for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with limited meteorological variables
title_full Comparison of five Boosting-based models for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with limited meteorological variables
title_fullStr Comparison of five Boosting-based models for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with limited meteorological variables
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of five Boosting-based models for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with limited meteorological variables
title_short Comparison of five Boosting-based models for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with limited meteorological variables
title_sort comparison of five boosting-based models for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with limited meteorological variables
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7347040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32598399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235324
work_keys_str_mv AT wutianao comparisonoffiveboostingbasedmodelsforestimatingdailyreferenceevapotranspirationwithlimitedmeteorologicalvariables
AT zhangwei comparisonoffiveboostingbasedmodelsforestimatingdailyreferenceevapotranspirationwithlimitedmeteorologicalvariables
AT jiaoxiyun comparisonoffiveboostingbasedmodelsforestimatingdailyreferenceevapotranspirationwithlimitedmeteorologicalvariables
AT guoweihua comparisonoffiveboostingbasedmodelsforestimatingdailyreferenceevapotranspirationwithlimitedmeteorologicalvariables
AT hamoudyousefalhaj comparisonoffiveboostingbasedmodelsforestimatingdailyreferenceevapotranspirationwithlimitedmeteorologicalvariables