Cargando…

Factors that influence vaccination decision-making among pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The most important factor influencing maternal vaccination uptake is healthcare professional (HCP) recommendation. However, where data are available, one-third of pregnant women remain unvaccinated despite receiving a recommendation. Therefore, it is essential to understand the significa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kilich, Eliz, Dada, Sara, Francis, Mark R., Tazare, John, Chico, R. Matthew, Paterson, Pauline, Larson, Heidi J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7347125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32645112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234827
_version_ 1783556532732952576
author Kilich, Eliz
Dada, Sara
Francis, Mark R.
Tazare, John
Chico, R. Matthew
Paterson, Pauline
Larson, Heidi J.
author_facet Kilich, Eliz
Dada, Sara
Francis, Mark R.
Tazare, John
Chico, R. Matthew
Paterson, Pauline
Larson, Heidi J.
author_sort Kilich, Eliz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The most important factor influencing maternal vaccination uptake is healthcare professional (HCP) recommendation. However, where data are available, one-third of pregnant women remain unvaccinated despite receiving a recommendation. Therefore, it is essential to understand the significance of other factors and distinguish between vaccines administered routinely and during outbreaks. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD 42019118299) to examine the strength of the relationships between identified factors and maternal vaccination uptake. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase Classic & Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, IBSS, LILACS, AfricaWideInfo, IMEMR, and Global Health databases for studies reporting factors that influence maternal vaccination. We used random-effects models to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) of being vaccinated by vaccine type. FINDINGS: We screened 17,236 articles and identified 120 studies from 30 countries for inclusion. Of these, 49 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. The odds of receiving a pertussis or influenza vaccination were ten to twelve-times higher among pregnant women who received a recommendation from HCPs. During the 2009 influenza pandemic an HCP recommendation increased the odds of antenatal H1N1 vaccine uptake six times (OR 6.76, 95% CI 3.12–14.64, I(2) = 92.00%). Believing there was potential for vaccine-induced harm had a negative influence on seasonal (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11–0.44 I(2) = 84.00%) and pandemic influenza vaccine uptake (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.09–0.29, I(2) = 89.48%), reducing the odds of being vaccinated five-fold. Combined with our qualitative analysis the relationship between the belief in substantial disease risk and maternal seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccination uptake was limited. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of an HCP recommendation during an outbreak, whilst still powerful, may be muted by other factors. This requires further research, particularly when vaccines are novel. Public health campaigns which centre on the protectiveness and safety of a maternal vaccine rather than disease threat alone may prove beneficial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7347125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73471252020-07-17 Factors that influence vaccination decision-making among pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis Kilich, Eliz Dada, Sara Francis, Mark R. Tazare, John Chico, R. Matthew Paterson, Pauline Larson, Heidi J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The most important factor influencing maternal vaccination uptake is healthcare professional (HCP) recommendation. However, where data are available, one-third of pregnant women remain unvaccinated despite receiving a recommendation. Therefore, it is essential to understand the significance of other factors and distinguish between vaccines administered routinely and during outbreaks. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD 42019118299) to examine the strength of the relationships between identified factors and maternal vaccination uptake. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase Classic & Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, IBSS, LILACS, AfricaWideInfo, IMEMR, and Global Health databases for studies reporting factors that influence maternal vaccination. We used random-effects models to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) of being vaccinated by vaccine type. FINDINGS: We screened 17,236 articles and identified 120 studies from 30 countries for inclusion. Of these, 49 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. The odds of receiving a pertussis or influenza vaccination were ten to twelve-times higher among pregnant women who received a recommendation from HCPs. During the 2009 influenza pandemic an HCP recommendation increased the odds of antenatal H1N1 vaccine uptake six times (OR 6.76, 95% CI 3.12–14.64, I(2) = 92.00%). Believing there was potential for vaccine-induced harm had a negative influence on seasonal (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11–0.44 I(2) = 84.00%) and pandemic influenza vaccine uptake (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.09–0.29, I(2) = 89.48%), reducing the odds of being vaccinated five-fold. Combined with our qualitative analysis the relationship between the belief in substantial disease risk and maternal seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccination uptake was limited. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of an HCP recommendation during an outbreak, whilst still powerful, may be muted by other factors. This requires further research, particularly when vaccines are novel. Public health campaigns which centre on the protectiveness and safety of a maternal vaccine rather than disease threat alone may prove beneficial. Public Library of Science 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7347125/ /pubmed/32645112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234827 Text en © 2020 Kilich et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kilich, Eliz
Dada, Sara
Francis, Mark R.
Tazare, John
Chico, R. Matthew
Paterson, Pauline
Larson, Heidi J.
Factors that influence vaccination decision-making among pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Factors that influence vaccination decision-making among pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Factors that influence vaccination decision-making among pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Factors that influence vaccination decision-making among pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Factors that influence vaccination decision-making among pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Factors that influence vaccination decision-making among pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort factors that influence vaccination decision-making among pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7347125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32645112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234827
work_keys_str_mv AT kilicheliz factorsthatinfluencevaccinationdecisionmakingamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dadasara factorsthatinfluencevaccinationdecisionmakingamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT francismarkr factorsthatinfluencevaccinationdecisionmakingamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tazarejohn factorsthatinfluencevaccinationdecisionmakingamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chicormatthew factorsthatinfluencevaccinationdecisionmakingamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT patersonpauline factorsthatinfluencevaccinationdecisionmakingamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT larsonheidij factorsthatinfluencevaccinationdecisionmakingamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis