Cargando…

Virus inoculation and treatment regimens for evaluating anti-filovirus monoclonal antibody efficacy in vivo

The development of monoclonal antibodies to treat disease caused by filoviruses, particularly Ebola virus, has risen steeply in recent years thanks to several key studies demonstrating their remarkable therapeutic potential. The increased drive to develop new and better monoclonal antibodies has nec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Banadyga, Logan, Schiffman, Zachary, He, Shihua, Qiu, Xiangguo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chinese Medical Association Publishing House. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7347303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32835206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bsheal.2019.02.004
_version_ 1783556563979468800
author Banadyga, Logan
Schiffman, Zachary
He, Shihua
Qiu, Xiangguo
author_facet Banadyga, Logan
Schiffman, Zachary
He, Shihua
Qiu, Xiangguo
author_sort Banadyga, Logan
collection PubMed
description The development of monoclonal antibodies to treat disease caused by filoviruses, particularly Ebola virus, has risen steeply in recent years thanks to several key studies demonstrating their remarkable therapeutic potential. The increased drive to develop new and better monoclonal antibodies has necessarily seen an increase in animal model efficacy testing, which is critical to the pre-clinical development of any novel countermeasure. Primary and secondary efficacy testing against filoviruses typically makes use of one or more rodent models (mice, guinea pigs, and occasionally hamsters) or the more recently described ferret model, although the exact choice of model depends on the specific filovirus being evaluated. Indeed, no single small animal model exists for all filoviruses, and the use of any given model must consider the nature of that model as well as the nature of the therapeutic and the experimental objectives. Confirmatory evaluation, on the other hand, is performed in nonhuman primates (rhesus or cynomolgus macaques) regardless of the filovirus. In light of the number of different animal models that are currently used in monoclonal antibody efficacy testing, we sought to better understand how these efficacy tests are being performed by numerous different laboratories around the world. To this end, we review the animal models that are being used for antibody efficacy testing against filoviruses, and we highlight the challenge doses and routes of infection that are used. We also describe the various antibody treatment regimens, including antibody dose, route, and schedule of administration, that are used in these model systems. We do not identify any single best model or treatment regimen, and we do not advocate for field-wide protocol standardization. Instead, we hope to provide a comprehensive resource that will facilitate and enhance the continued pre-clinical development of novel monoclonal antibody therapeutics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7347303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Chinese Medical Association Publishing House. Published by Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73473032020-07-10 Virus inoculation and treatment regimens for evaluating anti-filovirus monoclonal antibody efficacy in vivo Banadyga, Logan Schiffman, Zachary He, Shihua Qiu, Xiangguo Biosaf Health Article The development of monoclonal antibodies to treat disease caused by filoviruses, particularly Ebola virus, has risen steeply in recent years thanks to several key studies demonstrating their remarkable therapeutic potential. The increased drive to develop new and better monoclonal antibodies has necessarily seen an increase in animal model efficacy testing, which is critical to the pre-clinical development of any novel countermeasure. Primary and secondary efficacy testing against filoviruses typically makes use of one or more rodent models (mice, guinea pigs, and occasionally hamsters) or the more recently described ferret model, although the exact choice of model depends on the specific filovirus being evaluated. Indeed, no single small animal model exists for all filoviruses, and the use of any given model must consider the nature of that model as well as the nature of the therapeutic and the experimental objectives. Confirmatory evaluation, on the other hand, is performed in nonhuman primates (rhesus or cynomolgus macaques) regardless of the filovirus. In light of the number of different animal models that are currently used in monoclonal antibody efficacy testing, we sought to better understand how these efficacy tests are being performed by numerous different laboratories around the world. To this end, we review the animal models that are being used for antibody efficacy testing against filoviruses, and we highlight the challenge doses and routes of infection that are used. We also describe the various antibody treatment regimens, including antibody dose, route, and schedule of administration, that are used in these model systems. We do not identify any single best model or treatment regimen, and we do not advocate for field-wide protocol standardization. Instead, we hope to provide a comprehensive resource that will facilitate and enhance the continued pre-clinical development of novel monoclonal antibody therapeutics. Chinese Medical Association Publishing House. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2019-06 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7347303/ /pubmed/32835206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bsheal.2019.02.004 Text en © 2019 Chinese Medical Association Publishing House. Published by Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Banadyga, Logan
Schiffman, Zachary
He, Shihua
Qiu, Xiangguo
Virus inoculation and treatment regimens for evaluating anti-filovirus monoclonal antibody efficacy in vivo
title Virus inoculation and treatment regimens for evaluating anti-filovirus monoclonal antibody efficacy in vivo
title_full Virus inoculation and treatment regimens for evaluating anti-filovirus monoclonal antibody efficacy in vivo
title_fullStr Virus inoculation and treatment regimens for evaluating anti-filovirus monoclonal antibody efficacy in vivo
title_full_unstemmed Virus inoculation and treatment regimens for evaluating anti-filovirus monoclonal antibody efficacy in vivo
title_short Virus inoculation and treatment regimens for evaluating anti-filovirus monoclonal antibody efficacy in vivo
title_sort virus inoculation and treatment regimens for evaluating anti-filovirus monoclonal antibody efficacy in vivo
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7347303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32835206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bsheal.2019.02.004
work_keys_str_mv AT banadygalogan virusinoculationandtreatmentregimensforevaluatingantifilovirusmonoclonalantibodyefficacyinvivo
AT schiffmanzachary virusinoculationandtreatmentregimensforevaluatingantifilovirusmonoclonalantibodyefficacyinvivo
AT heshihua virusinoculationandtreatmentregimensforevaluatingantifilovirusmonoclonalantibodyefficacyinvivo
AT qiuxiangguo virusinoculationandtreatmentregimensforevaluatingantifilovirusmonoclonalantibodyefficacyinvivo