Cargando…
Virus inoculation and treatment regimens for evaluating anti-filovirus monoclonal antibody efficacy in vivo
The development of monoclonal antibodies to treat disease caused by filoviruses, particularly Ebola virus, has risen steeply in recent years thanks to several key studies demonstrating their remarkable therapeutic potential. The increased drive to develop new and better monoclonal antibodies has nec...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Chinese Medical Association Publishing House. Published by Elsevier B.V.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7347303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32835206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bsheal.2019.02.004 |
_version_ | 1783556563979468800 |
---|---|
author | Banadyga, Logan Schiffman, Zachary He, Shihua Qiu, Xiangguo |
author_facet | Banadyga, Logan Schiffman, Zachary He, Shihua Qiu, Xiangguo |
author_sort | Banadyga, Logan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The development of monoclonal antibodies to treat disease caused by filoviruses, particularly Ebola virus, has risen steeply in recent years thanks to several key studies demonstrating their remarkable therapeutic potential. The increased drive to develop new and better monoclonal antibodies has necessarily seen an increase in animal model efficacy testing, which is critical to the pre-clinical development of any novel countermeasure. Primary and secondary efficacy testing against filoviruses typically makes use of one or more rodent models (mice, guinea pigs, and occasionally hamsters) or the more recently described ferret model, although the exact choice of model depends on the specific filovirus being evaluated. Indeed, no single small animal model exists for all filoviruses, and the use of any given model must consider the nature of that model as well as the nature of the therapeutic and the experimental objectives. Confirmatory evaluation, on the other hand, is performed in nonhuman primates (rhesus or cynomolgus macaques) regardless of the filovirus. In light of the number of different animal models that are currently used in monoclonal antibody efficacy testing, we sought to better understand how these efficacy tests are being performed by numerous different laboratories around the world. To this end, we review the animal models that are being used for antibody efficacy testing against filoviruses, and we highlight the challenge doses and routes of infection that are used. We also describe the various antibody treatment regimens, including antibody dose, route, and schedule of administration, that are used in these model systems. We do not identify any single best model or treatment regimen, and we do not advocate for field-wide protocol standardization. Instead, we hope to provide a comprehensive resource that will facilitate and enhance the continued pre-clinical development of novel monoclonal antibody therapeutics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7347303 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Chinese Medical Association Publishing House. Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73473032020-07-10 Virus inoculation and treatment regimens for evaluating anti-filovirus monoclonal antibody efficacy in vivo Banadyga, Logan Schiffman, Zachary He, Shihua Qiu, Xiangguo Biosaf Health Article The development of monoclonal antibodies to treat disease caused by filoviruses, particularly Ebola virus, has risen steeply in recent years thanks to several key studies demonstrating their remarkable therapeutic potential. The increased drive to develop new and better monoclonal antibodies has necessarily seen an increase in animal model efficacy testing, which is critical to the pre-clinical development of any novel countermeasure. Primary and secondary efficacy testing against filoviruses typically makes use of one or more rodent models (mice, guinea pigs, and occasionally hamsters) or the more recently described ferret model, although the exact choice of model depends on the specific filovirus being evaluated. Indeed, no single small animal model exists for all filoviruses, and the use of any given model must consider the nature of that model as well as the nature of the therapeutic and the experimental objectives. Confirmatory evaluation, on the other hand, is performed in nonhuman primates (rhesus or cynomolgus macaques) regardless of the filovirus. In light of the number of different animal models that are currently used in monoclonal antibody efficacy testing, we sought to better understand how these efficacy tests are being performed by numerous different laboratories around the world. To this end, we review the animal models that are being used for antibody efficacy testing against filoviruses, and we highlight the challenge doses and routes of infection that are used. We also describe the various antibody treatment regimens, including antibody dose, route, and schedule of administration, that are used in these model systems. We do not identify any single best model or treatment regimen, and we do not advocate for field-wide protocol standardization. Instead, we hope to provide a comprehensive resource that will facilitate and enhance the continued pre-clinical development of novel monoclonal antibody therapeutics. Chinese Medical Association Publishing House. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2019-06 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7347303/ /pubmed/32835206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bsheal.2019.02.004 Text en © 2019 Chinese Medical Association Publishing House. Published by Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Banadyga, Logan Schiffman, Zachary He, Shihua Qiu, Xiangguo Virus inoculation and treatment regimens for evaluating anti-filovirus monoclonal antibody efficacy in vivo |
title | Virus inoculation and treatment regimens for evaluating anti-filovirus monoclonal antibody efficacy in vivo |
title_full | Virus inoculation and treatment regimens for evaluating anti-filovirus monoclonal antibody efficacy in vivo |
title_fullStr | Virus inoculation and treatment regimens for evaluating anti-filovirus monoclonal antibody efficacy in vivo |
title_full_unstemmed | Virus inoculation and treatment regimens for evaluating anti-filovirus monoclonal antibody efficacy in vivo |
title_short | Virus inoculation and treatment regimens for evaluating anti-filovirus monoclonal antibody efficacy in vivo |
title_sort | virus inoculation and treatment regimens for evaluating anti-filovirus monoclonal antibody efficacy in vivo |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7347303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32835206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bsheal.2019.02.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT banadygalogan virusinoculationandtreatmentregimensforevaluatingantifilovirusmonoclonalantibodyefficacyinvivo AT schiffmanzachary virusinoculationandtreatmentregimensforevaluatingantifilovirusmonoclonalantibodyefficacyinvivo AT heshihua virusinoculationandtreatmentregimensforevaluatingantifilovirusmonoclonalantibodyefficacyinvivo AT qiuxiangguo virusinoculationandtreatmentregimensforevaluatingantifilovirusmonoclonalantibodyefficacyinvivo |