Cargando…
A Comprehensive Comparison of LRYGB and LSG in Obese Patients Including the Effects on QoL, Comorbidities, Weight Loss, and Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE: To systematically and comprehensively evaluate the differences between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in obese patients. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from ince...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7347514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31834563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04306-4 |
_version_ | 1783556601530023936 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Zhihao Sun, Junfeng Li, Ruixin Wang, Zhuoyin Ding, Hengxuan Zhu, Tianyu Wang, Guojun |
author_facet | Hu, Zhihao Sun, Junfeng Li, Ruixin Wang, Zhuoyin Ding, Hengxuan Zhu, Tianyu Wang, Guojun |
author_sort | Hu, Zhihao |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To systematically and comprehensively evaluate the differences between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in obese patients. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to December 2018. The meta-analysis was performed by the RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: Twenty-three articles with 7443 patients were included. In short term (< 3 years), LRYGB was superior to LSG in terms of improving comorbidities (T2D, odds ratio (OR) 1.93, 1.06–3.52, P < 0.05, hypertension, OR 1.59, 1.08–2.34, P < 0.05, dyslipidemia, OR 1.61, 1.05–2.46, P < 0.05), but there were no differences in the midterm and long term. Quality of life (QoL) after bariatric surgery was included, but no differences were observed in the QoL after LRYGB or LSG (gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) and Moorehead–Ardelt quality of life questionnaire (M-A-Q), P > 0.05). LRYGB achieved a higher EWL% than LSG (after 3 years, WMD 5.48, 0.13–10.84. P < 0.05; after 5 years, WMD 4.55, 1.04–8.05, P < 0.05) in long term, but no significant differences were found during 0.25- to 2.0-year follow-up. The rate of early and late complications was much higher in LRYGB than in LSG (early complications, OR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.53–2.91, P < 0.001; late complications, OR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.93–3.49, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that LRYGB was more effective than LSG in comorbidities’ resolution or improvement in short term. For weight loss, LRYGB had better long-term effects than LSG. In addition, no differences were observed in the quality of life after LRYGB or LSG. LRYGB was associated with more complications than LSG. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11695-019-04306-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7347514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73475142020-07-13 A Comprehensive Comparison of LRYGB and LSG in Obese Patients Including the Effects on QoL, Comorbidities, Weight Loss, and Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Hu, Zhihao Sun, Junfeng Li, Ruixin Wang, Zhuoyin Ding, Hengxuan Zhu, Tianyu Wang, Guojun Obes Surg Original Contributions PURPOSE: To systematically and comprehensively evaluate the differences between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in obese patients. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to December 2018. The meta-analysis was performed by the RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: Twenty-three articles with 7443 patients were included. In short term (< 3 years), LRYGB was superior to LSG in terms of improving comorbidities (T2D, odds ratio (OR) 1.93, 1.06–3.52, P < 0.05, hypertension, OR 1.59, 1.08–2.34, P < 0.05, dyslipidemia, OR 1.61, 1.05–2.46, P < 0.05), but there were no differences in the midterm and long term. Quality of life (QoL) after bariatric surgery was included, but no differences were observed in the QoL after LRYGB or LSG (gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) and Moorehead–Ardelt quality of life questionnaire (M-A-Q), P > 0.05). LRYGB achieved a higher EWL% than LSG (after 3 years, WMD 5.48, 0.13–10.84. P < 0.05; after 5 years, WMD 4.55, 1.04–8.05, P < 0.05) in long term, but no significant differences were found during 0.25- to 2.0-year follow-up. The rate of early and late complications was much higher in LRYGB than in LSG (early complications, OR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.53–2.91, P < 0.001; late complications, OR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.93–3.49, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that LRYGB was more effective than LSG in comorbidities’ resolution or improvement in short term. For weight loss, LRYGB had better long-term effects than LSG. In addition, no differences were observed in the quality of life after LRYGB or LSG. LRYGB was associated with more complications than LSG. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11695-019-04306-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-12-13 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7347514/ /pubmed/31834563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04306-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Contributions Hu, Zhihao Sun, Junfeng Li, Ruixin Wang, Zhuoyin Ding, Hengxuan Zhu, Tianyu Wang, Guojun A Comprehensive Comparison of LRYGB and LSG in Obese Patients Including the Effects on QoL, Comorbidities, Weight Loss, and Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | A Comprehensive Comparison of LRYGB and LSG in Obese Patients Including the Effects on QoL, Comorbidities, Weight Loss, and Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | A Comprehensive Comparison of LRYGB and LSG in Obese Patients Including the Effects on QoL, Comorbidities, Weight Loss, and Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | A Comprehensive Comparison of LRYGB and LSG in Obese Patients Including the Effects on QoL, Comorbidities, Weight Loss, and Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comprehensive Comparison of LRYGB and LSG in Obese Patients Including the Effects on QoL, Comorbidities, Weight Loss, and Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | A Comprehensive Comparison of LRYGB and LSG in Obese Patients Including the Effects on QoL, Comorbidities, Weight Loss, and Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | comprehensive comparison of lrygb and lsg in obese patients including the effects on qol, comorbidities, weight loss, and complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Contributions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7347514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31834563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04306-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huzhihao acomprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sunjunfeng acomprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liruixin acomprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangzhuoyin acomprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dinghengxuan acomprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhutianyu acomprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangguojun acomprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huzhihao comprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sunjunfeng comprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liruixin comprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangzhuoyin comprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dinghengxuan comprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhutianyu comprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangguojun comprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |