Cargando…

A Comprehensive Comparison of LRYGB and LSG in Obese Patients Including the Effects on QoL, Comorbidities, Weight Loss, and Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE: To systematically and comprehensively evaluate the differences between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in obese patients. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from ince...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Zhihao, Sun, Junfeng, Li, Ruixin, Wang, Zhuoyin, Ding, Hengxuan, Zhu, Tianyu, Wang, Guojun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7347514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31834563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04306-4
_version_ 1783556601530023936
author Hu, Zhihao
Sun, Junfeng
Li, Ruixin
Wang, Zhuoyin
Ding, Hengxuan
Zhu, Tianyu
Wang, Guojun
author_facet Hu, Zhihao
Sun, Junfeng
Li, Ruixin
Wang, Zhuoyin
Ding, Hengxuan
Zhu, Tianyu
Wang, Guojun
author_sort Hu, Zhihao
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To systematically and comprehensively evaluate the differences between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in obese patients. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to December 2018. The meta-analysis was performed by the RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: Twenty-three articles with 7443 patients were included. In short term (< 3 years), LRYGB was superior to LSG in terms of improving comorbidities (T2D, odds ratio (OR) 1.93, 1.06–3.52, P < 0.05, hypertension, OR 1.59, 1.08–2.34, P < 0.05, dyslipidemia, OR 1.61, 1.05–2.46, P < 0.05), but there were no differences in the midterm and long term. Quality of life (QoL) after bariatric surgery was included, but no differences were observed in the QoL after LRYGB or LSG (gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) and Moorehead–Ardelt quality of life questionnaire (M-A-Q), P > 0.05). LRYGB achieved a higher EWL% than LSG (after 3 years, WMD 5.48, 0.13–10.84. P < 0.05; after 5 years, WMD 4.55, 1.04–8.05, P < 0.05) in long term, but no significant differences were found during 0.25- to 2.0-year follow-up. The rate of early and late complications was much higher in LRYGB than in LSG (early complications, OR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.53–2.91, P < 0.001; late complications, OR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.93–3.49, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that LRYGB was more effective than LSG in comorbidities’ resolution or improvement in short term. For weight loss, LRYGB had better long-term effects than LSG. In addition, no differences were observed in the quality of life after LRYGB or LSG. LRYGB was associated with more complications than LSG. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11695-019-04306-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7347514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73475142020-07-13 A Comprehensive Comparison of LRYGB and LSG in Obese Patients Including the Effects on QoL, Comorbidities, Weight Loss, and Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Hu, Zhihao Sun, Junfeng Li, Ruixin Wang, Zhuoyin Ding, Hengxuan Zhu, Tianyu Wang, Guojun Obes Surg Original Contributions PURPOSE: To systematically and comprehensively evaluate the differences between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in obese patients. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to December 2018. The meta-analysis was performed by the RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: Twenty-three articles with 7443 patients were included. In short term (< 3 years), LRYGB was superior to LSG in terms of improving comorbidities (T2D, odds ratio (OR) 1.93, 1.06–3.52, P < 0.05, hypertension, OR 1.59, 1.08–2.34, P < 0.05, dyslipidemia, OR 1.61, 1.05–2.46, P < 0.05), but there were no differences in the midterm and long term. Quality of life (QoL) after bariatric surgery was included, but no differences were observed in the QoL after LRYGB or LSG (gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) and Moorehead–Ardelt quality of life questionnaire (M-A-Q), P > 0.05). LRYGB achieved a higher EWL% than LSG (after 3 years, WMD 5.48, 0.13–10.84. P < 0.05; after 5 years, WMD 4.55, 1.04–8.05, P < 0.05) in long term, but no significant differences were found during 0.25- to 2.0-year follow-up. The rate of early and late complications was much higher in LRYGB than in LSG (early complications, OR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.53–2.91, P < 0.001; late complications, OR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.93–3.49, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that LRYGB was more effective than LSG in comorbidities’ resolution or improvement in short term. For weight loss, LRYGB had better long-term effects than LSG. In addition, no differences were observed in the quality of life after LRYGB or LSG. LRYGB was associated with more complications than LSG. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11695-019-04306-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-12-13 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7347514/ /pubmed/31834563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04306-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Hu, Zhihao
Sun, Junfeng
Li, Ruixin
Wang, Zhuoyin
Ding, Hengxuan
Zhu, Tianyu
Wang, Guojun
A Comprehensive Comparison of LRYGB and LSG in Obese Patients Including the Effects on QoL, Comorbidities, Weight Loss, and Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title A Comprehensive Comparison of LRYGB and LSG in Obese Patients Including the Effects on QoL, Comorbidities, Weight Loss, and Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full A Comprehensive Comparison of LRYGB and LSG in Obese Patients Including the Effects on QoL, Comorbidities, Weight Loss, and Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr A Comprehensive Comparison of LRYGB and LSG in Obese Patients Including the Effects on QoL, Comorbidities, Weight Loss, and Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed A Comprehensive Comparison of LRYGB and LSG in Obese Patients Including the Effects on QoL, Comorbidities, Weight Loss, and Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short A Comprehensive Comparison of LRYGB and LSG in Obese Patients Including the Effects on QoL, Comorbidities, Weight Loss, and Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort comprehensive comparison of lrygb and lsg in obese patients including the effects on qol, comorbidities, weight loss, and complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7347514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31834563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04306-4
work_keys_str_mv AT huzhihao acomprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sunjunfeng acomprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liruixin acomprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangzhuoyin acomprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dinghengxuan acomprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhutianyu acomprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangguojun acomprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huzhihao comprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sunjunfeng comprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liruixin comprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangzhuoyin comprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dinghengxuan comprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhutianyu comprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangguojun comprehensivecomparisonoflrygbandlsginobesepatientsincludingtheeffectsonqolcomorbiditiesweightlossandcomplicationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis