Cargando…

Effects of substratum and depth on benthic harmful dinoflagellate assemblages

Microhabitats influence the distribution and abundance of benthic harmful dinoflagellate (BHAB) species. Currently, much of the information on the relationships between BHABs and microhabitat preferences is based on non-quantitative anecdotal observations, many of which are contradictory. The goal o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Li Keat, Lim, Zhen Fei, Gu, Haifeng, Chan, Leo Lai, Litaker, R. Wayne, Tester, Patricia A., Leaw, Chui Pin, Lim, Po Teen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7347539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68136-6
_version_ 1783556607130468352
author Lee, Li Keat
Lim, Zhen Fei
Gu, Haifeng
Chan, Leo Lai
Litaker, R. Wayne
Tester, Patricia A.
Leaw, Chui Pin
Lim, Po Teen
author_facet Lee, Li Keat
Lim, Zhen Fei
Gu, Haifeng
Chan, Leo Lai
Litaker, R. Wayne
Tester, Patricia A.
Leaw, Chui Pin
Lim, Po Teen
author_sort Lee, Li Keat
collection PubMed
description Microhabitats influence the distribution and abundance of benthic harmful dinoflagellate (BHAB) species. Currently, much of the information on the relationships between BHABs and microhabitat preferences is based on non-quantitative anecdotal observations, many of which are contradictory. The goal of this study was to better quantify BHAB and microhabitat relationships using a statistically rigorous approach. Between April 2016 to May 2017, a total of 243 artificial substrate samplers were deployed at five locations in the Perhentian Islands, Malaysia while simultaneous photo-quadrat surveys were performed to characterize the benthic substrates present at each sampling site. The screen samplers were retrieved 24 h later and the abundances of five BHAB genera, Gambierdiscus, Ostreopsis, Coolia, Amphidinium, and Prorocentrum were determined. Substrate data were then analyzed using a Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrix to statistically identify distinct microhabitat types. Although BHABs were associated with a variety of biotic and abiotic substrates, the results of this study demonstrated differing degrees of microhabitat preference. Analysis of the survey results using canonical correspondence analysis explained 70.5% (horizontal first axis) and 21.6% (vertical second axis) of the constrained variation in the distribution of various genera among microhabitat types. Prorocentrum and Coolia appear to have the greatest range being broadly distributed among a wide variety of microhabitats. Amphidinium was always found in low abundances and was widely distributed among microhabitats dominated by hard coral, turf algae, sand and silt, and fleshy algae and reached the highest abundances there. Gambierdiscus and Ostreopsis had more restricted distributions. Gambierdiscus were found preferentially associated with turf algae, hard coral and, to a lesser extent, fleshy macroalgae microhabitats. Ostreopsis, almost always more abundant than Gambierdiscus, preferred the same microhabitats as Gambierdiscus and were found in microbial mats as well. With similar habitat preferences Ostreopsis may serve as an indicator organism for the presence of Gambierdiscus. This study provides insight into how BHAB-specific microhabitat preferences can affect toxicity risks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7347539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73475392020-07-10 Effects of substratum and depth on benthic harmful dinoflagellate assemblages Lee, Li Keat Lim, Zhen Fei Gu, Haifeng Chan, Leo Lai Litaker, R. Wayne Tester, Patricia A. Leaw, Chui Pin Lim, Po Teen Sci Rep Article Microhabitats influence the distribution and abundance of benthic harmful dinoflagellate (BHAB) species. Currently, much of the information on the relationships between BHABs and microhabitat preferences is based on non-quantitative anecdotal observations, many of which are contradictory. The goal of this study was to better quantify BHAB and microhabitat relationships using a statistically rigorous approach. Between April 2016 to May 2017, a total of 243 artificial substrate samplers were deployed at five locations in the Perhentian Islands, Malaysia while simultaneous photo-quadrat surveys were performed to characterize the benthic substrates present at each sampling site. The screen samplers were retrieved 24 h later and the abundances of five BHAB genera, Gambierdiscus, Ostreopsis, Coolia, Amphidinium, and Prorocentrum were determined. Substrate data were then analyzed using a Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrix to statistically identify distinct microhabitat types. Although BHABs were associated with a variety of biotic and abiotic substrates, the results of this study demonstrated differing degrees of microhabitat preference. Analysis of the survey results using canonical correspondence analysis explained 70.5% (horizontal first axis) and 21.6% (vertical second axis) of the constrained variation in the distribution of various genera among microhabitat types. Prorocentrum and Coolia appear to have the greatest range being broadly distributed among a wide variety of microhabitats. Amphidinium was always found in low abundances and was widely distributed among microhabitats dominated by hard coral, turf algae, sand and silt, and fleshy algae and reached the highest abundances there. Gambierdiscus and Ostreopsis had more restricted distributions. Gambierdiscus were found preferentially associated with turf algae, hard coral and, to a lesser extent, fleshy macroalgae microhabitats. Ostreopsis, almost always more abundant than Gambierdiscus, preferred the same microhabitats as Gambierdiscus and were found in microbial mats as well. With similar habitat preferences Ostreopsis may serve as an indicator organism for the presence of Gambierdiscus. This study provides insight into how BHAB-specific microhabitat preferences can affect toxicity risks. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7347539/ /pubmed/32647125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68136-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Li Keat
Lim, Zhen Fei
Gu, Haifeng
Chan, Leo Lai
Litaker, R. Wayne
Tester, Patricia A.
Leaw, Chui Pin
Lim, Po Teen
Effects of substratum and depth on benthic harmful dinoflagellate assemblages
title Effects of substratum and depth on benthic harmful dinoflagellate assemblages
title_full Effects of substratum and depth on benthic harmful dinoflagellate assemblages
title_fullStr Effects of substratum and depth on benthic harmful dinoflagellate assemblages
title_full_unstemmed Effects of substratum and depth on benthic harmful dinoflagellate assemblages
title_short Effects of substratum and depth on benthic harmful dinoflagellate assemblages
title_sort effects of substratum and depth on benthic harmful dinoflagellate assemblages
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7347539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68136-6
work_keys_str_mv AT leelikeat effectsofsubstratumanddepthonbenthicharmfuldinoflagellateassemblages
AT limzhenfei effectsofsubstratumanddepthonbenthicharmfuldinoflagellateassemblages
AT guhaifeng effectsofsubstratumanddepthonbenthicharmfuldinoflagellateassemblages
AT chanleolai effectsofsubstratumanddepthonbenthicharmfuldinoflagellateassemblages
AT litakerrwayne effectsofsubstratumanddepthonbenthicharmfuldinoflagellateassemblages
AT testerpatriciaa effectsofsubstratumanddepthonbenthicharmfuldinoflagellateassemblages
AT leawchuipin effectsofsubstratumanddepthonbenthicharmfuldinoflagellateassemblages
AT limpoteen effectsofsubstratumanddepthonbenthicharmfuldinoflagellateassemblages