Cargando…

Triptan efficacy does not predict onabotulinumtoxinA efficacy but improves with onabotulinumtoxinA response in chronic migraine patients

Chronic migraine (CM) is a highly disabling primary headache. Botulinum toxin (onabotulinumtoxinA) is effective for treatment of CM, with ~ 50% of patients responding after 24 weeks. A response predictor would prevent unnecessary treatments. Inhibiting calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) release...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eren, Ozan E., Gaul, Charly, Peikert, Andreas, Gendolla, Astrid, Ruscheweyh, Ruth, Straube, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7347633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68149-1
_version_ 1783556628972306432
author Eren, Ozan E.
Gaul, Charly
Peikert, Andreas
Gendolla, Astrid
Ruscheweyh, Ruth
Straube, Andreas
author_facet Eren, Ozan E.
Gaul, Charly
Peikert, Andreas
Gendolla, Astrid
Ruscheweyh, Ruth
Straube, Andreas
author_sort Eren, Ozan E.
collection PubMed
description Chronic migraine (CM) is a highly disabling primary headache. Botulinum toxin (onabotulinumtoxinA) is effective for treatment of CM, with ~ 50% of patients responding after 24 weeks. A response predictor would prevent unnecessary treatments. Inhibiting calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) release from trigeminal nociceptive fibres is one of the modes of acting discussed for onabotulinumtoxinA in CM. Therefore, we hypothesized that the response to triptans might predict response to onabotulinumtoxinA. Contrariwise, onabotulinumtoxinA treatment might affect triptan efficacy. 49 CM patients scheduled for their first onabotulinumtoxinA treatment were included. Before (T0) and three months after (T1) onabotulinumtoxinA treatment, patients rated triptan efficacy and indicated number of headache days/month. At T1, patients additionally rated onabotulinumtoxinA efficacy. Headache days/month were on average reduced by 7.1 ± 7.0 days from T0 to T1 (p < 0.001). Triptan efficacy ratings at T0 did not predict onabotulinumtoxinA efficacy ratings at T1 (p = 0.19) or reduction of headache days (p = 0.37). However, triptan efficacy significantly improved from T0 to T1 in onabotulinumtoxinA responders (p < 0.001) but not in non-responders (p = 1.00). Triptan efficacy did not predict response to onabotulinumtoxinA in CM. However, triptan efficacy increased after successful onabotulinumtoxinA treatment. This supports the hypothesis that efficacy of acute migraine treatment with triptans improves with effective migraine prophylaxis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7347633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73476332020-07-10 Triptan efficacy does not predict onabotulinumtoxinA efficacy but improves with onabotulinumtoxinA response in chronic migraine patients Eren, Ozan E. Gaul, Charly Peikert, Andreas Gendolla, Astrid Ruscheweyh, Ruth Straube, Andreas Sci Rep Article Chronic migraine (CM) is a highly disabling primary headache. Botulinum toxin (onabotulinumtoxinA) is effective for treatment of CM, with ~ 50% of patients responding after 24 weeks. A response predictor would prevent unnecessary treatments. Inhibiting calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) release from trigeminal nociceptive fibres is one of the modes of acting discussed for onabotulinumtoxinA in CM. Therefore, we hypothesized that the response to triptans might predict response to onabotulinumtoxinA. Contrariwise, onabotulinumtoxinA treatment might affect triptan efficacy. 49 CM patients scheduled for their first onabotulinumtoxinA treatment were included. Before (T0) and three months after (T1) onabotulinumtoxinA treatment, patients rated triptan efficacy and indicated number of headache days/month. At T1, patients additionally rated onabotulinumtoxinA efficacy. Headache days/month were on average reduced by 7.1 ± 7.0 days from T0 to T1 (p < 0.001). Triptan efficacy ratings at T0 did not predict onabotulinumtoxinA efficacy ratings at T1 (p = 0.19) or reduction of headache days (p = 0.37). However, triptan efficacy significantly improved from T0 to T1 in onabotulinumtoxinA responders (p < 0.001) but not in non-responders (p = 1.00). Triptan efficacy did not predict response to onabotulinumtoxinA in CM. However, triptan efficacy increased after successful onabotulinumtoxinA treatment. This supports the hypothesis that efficacy of acute migraine treatment with triptans improves with effective migraine prophylaxis. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7347633/ /pubmed/32647152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68149-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Eren, Ozan E.
Gaul, Charly
Peikert, Andreas
Gendolla, Astrid
Ruscheweyh, Ruth
Straube, Andreas
Triptan efficacy does not predict onabotulinumtoxinA efficacy but improves with onabotulinumtoxinA response in chronic migraine patients
title Triptan efficacy does not predict onabotulinumtoxinA efficacy but improves with onabotulinumtoxinA response in chronic migraine patients
title_full Triptan efficacy does not predict onabotulinumtoxinA efficacy but improves with onabotulinumtoxinA response in chronic migraine patients
title_fullStr Triptan efficacy does not predict onabotulinumtoxinA efficacy but improves with onabotulinumtoxinA response in chronic migraine patients
title_full_unstemmed Triptan efficacy does not predict onabotulinumtoxinA efficacy but improves with onabotulinumtoxinA response in chronic migraine patients
title_short Triptan efficacy does not predict onabotulinumtoxinA efficacy but improves with onabotulinumtoxinA response in chronic migraine patients
title_sort triptan efficacy does not predict onabotulinumtoxina efficacy but improves with onabotulinumtoxina response in chronic migraine patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7347633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68149-1
work_keys_str_mv AT erenozane triptanefficacydoesnotpredictonabotulinumtoxinaefficacybutimproveswithonabotulinumtoxinaresponseinchronicmigrainepatients
AT gaulcharly triptanefficacydoesnotpredictonabotulinumtoxinaefficacybutimproveswithonabotulinumtoxinaresponseinchronicmigrainepatients
AT peikertandreas triptanefficacydoesnotpredictonabotulinumtoxinaefficacybutimproveswithonabotulinumtoxinaresponseinchronicmigrainepatients
AT gendollaastrid triptanefficacydoesnotpredictonabotulinumtoxinaefficacybutimproveswithonabotulinumtoxinaresponseinchronicmigrainepatients
AT ruscheweyhruth triptanefficacydoesnotpredictonabotulinumtoxinaefficacybutimproveswithonabotulinumtoxinaresponseinchronicmigrainepatients
AT straubeandreas triptanefficacydoesnotpredictonabotulinumtoxinaefficacybutimproveswithonabotulinumtoxinaresponseinchronicmigrainepatients