Cargando…
Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results
INTRODUCTION: Dissemination of results to research participants is largely missing from the practices of most researchers. Few resources exist that describe best practices for disseminating information to this important stakeholder group. METHODS: Four focus groups were conducted with a diverse grou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.427 |
_version_ | 1783556704607141888 |
---|---|
author | Cook, Sarah Mayers, Stephanie Goggins, Kathryn Schlundt, David Bonnet, Kemberlee Williams, Neely Alcendor, Donald Barkin, Shari |
author_facet | Cook, Sarah Mayers, Stephanie Goggins, Kathryn Schlundt, David Bonnet, Kemberlee Williams, Neely Alcendor, Donald Barkin, Shari |
author_sort | Cook, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Dissemination of results to research participants is largely missing from the practices of most researchers. Few resources exist that describe best practices for disseminating information to this important stakeholder group. METHODS: Four focus groups were conducted with a diverse group of individuals. All participants were part of a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute-funded survey study. Focus groups aimed to identify participants’ preferences about receiving research results and their reactions to three different dissemination platforms. RESULTS: Four focus groups with 37 participants were conducted, including: (1) adults with one comorbidity, at least a college education, and high socioeconomic status (SES); (2) adults with one comorbidity, less than a college education, and lower SES; (3) adults with low health literacy and/or numeracy; and (4) Black or African American adults. Participants discussed their preferences for research results delivery and how each of the platforms met those preferences. This included information needs as they relate to content and scope, including a desire to receive both individual and aggregate results, and study summaries. Email, paper, and website were all popular avenues of presentation. Some desired a written summary, and others preferred videos or visual graphics. Importantly, participants emphasized the desire for having a choice in the timing, frequency, and types of results. CONCLUSION: Research participants prefer to receive research results, including study impact and key findings, disseminated to them in an engaging format that allows choice of when and how the information is presented. The results encourage new standards whereby research participants are considered a critical stakeholder group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7348009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73480092020-07-20 Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results Cook, Sarah Mayers, Stephanie Goggins, Kathryn Schlundt, David Bonnet, Kemberlee Williams, Neely Alcendor, Donald Barkin, Shari J Clin Transl Sci Research Article INTRODUCTION: Dissemination of results to research participants is largely missing from the practices of most researchers. Few resources exist that describe best practices for disseminating information to this important stakeholder group. METHODS: Four focus groups were conducted with a diverse group of individuals. All participants were part of a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute-funded survey study. Focus groups aimed to identify participants’ preferences about receiving research results and their reactions to three different dissemination platforms. RESULTS: Four focus groups with 37 participants were conducted, including: (1) adults with one comorbidity, at least a college education, and high socioeconomic status (SES); (2) adults with one comorbidity, less than a college education, and lower SES; (3) adults with low health literacy and/or numeracy; and (4) Black or African American adults. Participants discussed their preferences for research results delivery and how each of the platforms met those preferences. This included information needs as they relate to content and scope, including a desire to receive both individual and aggregate results, and study summaries. Email, paper, and website were all popular avenues of presentation. Some desired a written summary, and others preferred videos or visual graphics. Importantly, participants emphasized the desire for having a choice in the timing, frequency, and types of results. CONCLUSION: Research participants prefer to receive research results, including study impact and key findings, disseminated to them in an engaging format that allows choice of when and how the information is presented. The results encourage new standards whereby research participants are considered a critical stakeholder group. Cambridge University Press 2019-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7348009/ /pubmed/32695496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.427 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cook, Sarah Mayers, Stephanie Goggins, Kathryn Schlundt, David Bonnet, Kemberlee Williams, Neely Alcendor, Donald Barkin, Shari Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results |
title | Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results |
title_full | Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results |
title_fullStr | Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results |
title_short | Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results |
title_sort | assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.427 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cooksarah assessingresearchparticipantpreferencesforreceivingstudyresults AT mayersstephanie assessingresearchparticipantpreferencesforreceivingstudyresults AT gogginskathryn assessingresearchparticipantpreferencesforreceivingstudyresults AT schlundtdavid assessingresearchparticipantpreferencesforreceivingstudyresults AT bonnetkemberlee assessingresearchparticipantpreferencesforreceivingstudyresults AT williamsneely assessingresearchparticipantpreferencesforreceivingstudyresults AT alcendordonald assessingresearchparticipantpreferencesforreceivingstudyresults AT barkinshari assessingresearchparticipantpreferencesforreceivingstudyresults |