Cargando…

Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results

INTRODUCTION: Dissemination of results to research participants is largely missing from the practices of most researchers. Few resources exist that describe best practices for disseminating information to this important stakeholder group. METHODS: Four focus groups were conducted with a diverse grou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cook, Sarah, Mayers, Stephanie, Goggins, Kathryn, Schlundt, David, Bonnet, Kemberlee, Williams, Neely, Alcendor, Donald, Barkin, Shari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.427
_version_ 1783556704607141888
author Cook, Sarah
Mayers, Stephanie
Goggins, Kathryn
Schlundt, David
Bonnet, Kemberlee
Williams, Neely
Alcendor, Donald
Barkin, Shari
author_facet Cook, Sarah
Mayers, Stephanie
Goggins, Kathryn
Schlundt, David
Bonnet, Kemberlee
Williams, Neely
Alcendor, Donald
Barkin, Shari
author_sort Cook, Sarah
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Dissemination of results to research participants is largely missing from the practices of most researchers. Few resources exist that describe best practices for disseminating information to this important stakeholder group. METHODS: Four focus groups were conducted with a diverse group of individuals. All participants were part of a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute-funded survey study. Focus groups aimed to identify participants’ preferences about receiving research results and their reactions to three different dissemination platforms. RESULTS: Four focus groups with 37 participants were conducted, including: (1) adults with one comorbidity, at least a college education, and high socioeconomic status (SES); (2) adults with one comorbidity, less than a college education, and lower SES; (3) adults with low health literacy and/or numeracy; and (4) Black or African American adults. Participants discussed their preferences for research results delivery and how each of the platforms met those preferences. This included information needs as they relate to content and scope, including a desire to receive both individual and aggregate results, and study summaries. Email, paper, and website were all popular avenues of presentation. Some desired a written summary, and others preferred videos or visual graphics. Importantly, participants emphasized the desire for having a choice in the timing, frequency, and types of results. CONCLUSION: Research participants prefer to receive research results, including study impact and key findings, disseminated to them in an engaging format that allows choice of when and how the information is presented. The results encourage new standards whereby research participants are considered a critical stakeholder group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7348009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73480092020-07-20 Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results Cook, Sarah Mayers, Stephanie Goggins, Kathryn Schlundt, David Bonnet, Kemberlee Williams, Neely Alcendor, Donald Barkin, Shari J Clin Transl Sci Research Article INTRODUCTION: Dissemination of results to research participants is largely missing from the practices of most researchers. Few resources exist that describe best practices for disseminating information to this important stakeholder group. METHODS: Four focus groups were conducted with a diverse group of individuals. All participants were part of a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute-funded survey study. Focus groups aimed to identify participants’ preferences about receiving research results and their reactions to three different dissemination platforms. RESULTS: Four focus groups with 37 participants were conducted, including: (1) adults with one comorbidity, at least a college education, and high socioeconomic status (SES); (2) adults with one comorbidity, less than a college education, and lower SES; (3) adults with low health literacy and/or numeracy; and (4) Black or African American adults. Participants discussed their preferences for research results delivery and how each of the platforms met those preferences. This included information needs as they relate to content and scope, including a desire to receive both individual and aggregate results, and study summaries. Email, paper, and website were all popular avenues of presentation. Some desired a written summary, and others preferred videos or visual graphics. Importantly, participants emphasized the desire for having a choice in the timing, frequency, and types of results. CONCLUSION: Research participants prefer to receive research results, including study impact and key findings, disseminated to them in an engaging format that allows choice of when and how the information is presented. The results encourage new standards whereby research participants are considered a critical stakeholder group. Cambridge University Press 2019-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7348009/ /pubmed/32695496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.427 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cook, Sarah
Mayers, Stephanie
Goggins, Kathryn
Schlundt, David
Bonnet, Kemberlee
Williams, Neely
Alcendor, Donald
Barkin, Shari
Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results
title Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results
title_full Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results
title_fullStr Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results
title_full_unstemmed Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results
title_short Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results
title_sort assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.427
work_keys_str_mv AT cooksarah assessingresearchparticipantpreferencesforreceivingstudyresults
AT mayersstephanie assessingresearchparticipantpreferencesforreceivingstudyresults
AT gogginskathryn assessingresearchparticipantpreferencesforreceivingstudyresults
AT schlundtdavid assessingresearchparticipantpreferencesforreceivingstudyresults
AT bonnetkemberlee assessingresearchparticipantpreferencesforreceivingstudyresults
AT williamsneely assessingresearchparticipantpreferencesforreceivingstudyresults
AT alcendordonald assessingresearchparticipantpreferencesforreceivingstudyresults
AT barkinshari assessingresearchparticipantpreferencesforreceivingstudyresults