Cargando…
Multi-method process maps: An interdisciplinary approach to investigate ad hoc modifications in protocol-driven interventions
INTRODUCTION: Implementation scientists increasingly recognize that the process of implementation is dynamic, leading to ad hoc modifications that may challenge fidelity in protocol-driven interventions. However, limited attention to ad hoc modifications impairs investigators’ ability to develop evi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.14 |
_version_ | 1783556710938443776 |
---|---|
author | Mackie, Thomas I. Ramella, Leah Schaefer, Ana J. Sridhar, Monica Carter, Alice S. Eisenhower, Abbey Ibitamuno, Grace T. Petruccelli, Marisa Hudson, Shawna V. Sheldrick, R. Christopher |
author_facet | Mackie, Thomas I. Ramella, Leah Schaefer, Ana J. Sridhar, Monica Carter, Alice S. Eisenhower, Abbey Ibitamuno, Grace T. Petruccelli, Marisa Hudson, Shawna V. Sheldrick, R. Christopher |
author_sort | Mackie, Thomas I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Implementation scientists increasingly recognize that the process of implementation is dynamic, leading to ad hoc modifications that may challenge fidelity in protocol-driven interventions. However, limited attention to ad hoc modifications impairs investigators’ ability to develop evidence-based hypotheses about how such modifications may impact intervention effectiveness and cost. We propose a multi-method process map methodology to facilitate the systematic data collection necessary to characterize ad hoc modifications that may impact primary intervention outcomes. METHODS: We employ process maps (drawn from systems science), as well as focus groups and semi-structured interviews (drawn from social sciences) to investigate ad hoc modifications. Focus groups are conducted with the protocol’s developers and/or planners (the implementation team) to characterize the protocol “as envisioned,” while interviews conducted with frontline administrators characterize the process “as realized in practice.” Process maps with both samples are used to identify when modifications occurred across a protocol-driven intervention. A case study investigating a multistage screening protocol for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is presented to illustrate application and utility of the multi-method process maps. RESULTS: In this case study, frontline administrators reported ad hoc modifications that potentially influenced the primary study outcome (e.g., time to ASD diagnosis). Ad hoc modifications occurred to accommodate (1) whether providers and/or parents were concerned about ASD, (2) perceptions of parental readiness to discuss ASD, and (3) perceptions of family service delivery needs and priorities. CONCLUSION: Investigation of ad hoc modifications on primary outcomes offers new opportunities to develop empirically based adaptive interventions. Routine reporting standards are critical to provide full transparency when studying ad hoc modifications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7348036 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73480362020-07-20 Multi-method process maps: An interdisciplinary approach to investigate ad hoc modifications in protocol-driven interventions Mackie, Thomas I. Ramella, Leah Schaefer, Ana J. Sridhar, Monica Carter, Alice S. Eisenhower, Abbey Ibitamuno, Grace T. Petruccelli, Marisa Hudson, Shawna V. Sheldrick, R. Christopher J Clin Transl Sci Research Article INTRODUCTION: Implementation scientists increasingly recognize that the process of implementation is dynamic, leading to ad hoc modifications that may challenge fidelity in protocol-driven interventions. However, limited attention to ad hoc modifications impairs investigators’ ability to develop evidence-based hypotheses about how such modifications may impact intervention effectiveness and cost. We propose a multi-method process map methodology to facilitate the systematic data collection necessary to characterize ad hoc modifications that may impact primary intervention outcomes. METHODS: We employ process maps (drawn from systems science), as well as focus groups and semi-structured interviews (drawn from social sciences) to investigate ad hoc modifications. Focus groups are conducted with the protocol’s developers and/or planners (the implementation team) to characterize the protocol “as envisioned,” while interviews conducted with frontline administrators characterize the process “as realized in practice.” Process maps with both samples are used to identify when modifications occurred across a protocol-driven intervention. A case study investigating a multistage screening protocol for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is presented to illustrate application and utility of the multi-method process maps. RESULTS: In this case study, frontline administrators reported ad hoc modifications that potentially influenced the primary study outcome (e.g., time to ASD diagnosis). Ad hoc modifications occurred to accommodate (1) whether providers and/or parents were concerned about ASD, (2) perceptions of parental readiness to discuss ASD, and (3) perceptions of family service delivery needs and priorities. CONCLUSION: Investigation of ad hoc modifications on primary outcomes offers new opportunities to develop empirically based adaptive interventions. Routine reporting standards are critical to provide full transparency when studying ad hoc modifications. Cambridge University Press 2020-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7348036/ /pubmed/32695498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.14 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mackie, Thomas I. Ramella, Leah Schaefer, Ana J. Sridhar, Monica Carter, Alice S. Eisenhower, Abbey Ibitamuno, Grace T. Petruccelli, Marisa Hudson, Shawna V. Sheldrick, R. Christopher Multi-method process maps: An interdisciplinary approach to investigate ad hoc modifications in protocol-driven interventions |
title | Multi-method process maps: An interdisciplinary approach to investigate ad hoc modifications in protocol-driven interventions |
title_full | Multi-method process maps: An interdisciplinary approach to investigate ad hoc modifications in protocol-driven interventions |
title_fullStr | Multi-method process maps: An interdisciplinary approach to investigate ad hoc modifications in protocol-driven interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi-method process maps: An interdisciplinary approach to investigate ad hoc modifications in protocol-driven interventions |
title_short | Multi-method process maps: An interdisciplinary approach to investigate ad hoc modifications in protocol-driven interventions |
title_sort | multi-method process maps: an interdisciplinary approach to investigate ad hoc modifications in protocol-driven interventions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.14 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mackiethomasi multimethodprocessmapsaninterdisciplinaryapproachtoinvestigateadhocmodificationsinprotocoldriveninterventions AT ramellaleah multimethodprocessmapsaninterdisciplinaryapproachtoinvestigateadhocmodificationsinprotocoldriveninterventions AT schaeferanaj multimethodprocessmapsaninterdisciplinaryapproachtoinvestigateadhocmodificationsinprotocoldriveninterventions AT sridharmonica multimethodprocessmapsaninterdisciplinaryapproachtoinvestigateadhocmodificationsinprotocoldriveninterventions AT carteralices multimethodprocessmapsaninterdisciplinaryapproachtoinvestigateadhocmodificationsinprotocoldriveninterventions AT eisenhowerabbey multimethodprocessmapsaninterdisciplinaryapproachtoinvestigateadhocmodificationsinprotocoldriveninterventions AT ibitamunogracet multimethodprocessmapsaninterdisciplinaryapproachtoinvestigateadhocmodificationsinprotocoldriveninterventions AT petruccellimarisa multimethodprocessmapsaninterdisciplinaryapproachtoinvestigateadhocmodificationsinprotocoldriveninterventions AT hudsonshawnav multimethodprocessmapsaninterdisciplinaryapproachtoinvestigateadhocmodificationsinprotocoldriveninterventions AT sheldrickrchristopher multimethodprocessmapsaninterdisciplinaryapproachtoinvestigateadhocmodificationsinprotocoldriveninterventions |