Cargando…

Multi-method process maps: An interdisciplinary approach to investigate ad hoc modifications in protocol-driven interventions

INTRODUCTION: Implementation scientists increasingly recognize that the process of implementation is dynamic, leading to ad hoc modifications that may challenge fidelity in protocol-driven interventions. However, limited attention to ad hoc modifications impairs investigators’ ability to develop evi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mackie, Thomas I., Ramella, Leah, Schaefer, Ana J., Sridhar, Monica, Carter, Alice S., Eisenhower, Abbey, Ibitamuno, Grace T., Petruccelli, Marisa, Hudson, Shawna V., Sheldrick, R. Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.14
_version_ 1783556710938443776
author Mackie, Thomas I.
Ramella, Leah
Schaefer, Ana J.
Sridhar, Monica
Carter, Alice S.
Eisenhower, Abbey
Ibitamuno, Grace T.
Petruccelli, Marisa
Hudson, Shawna V.
Sheldrick, R. Christopher
author_facet Mackie, Thomas I.
Ramella, Leah
Schaefer, Ana J.
Sridhar, Monica
Carter, Alice S.
Eisenhower, Abbey
Ibitamuno, Grace T.
Petruccelli, Marisa
Hudson, Shawna V.
Sheldrick, R. Christopher
author_sort Mackie, Thomas I.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Implementation scientists increasingly recognize that the process of implementation is dynamic, leading to ad hoc modifications that may challenge fidelity in protocol-driven interventions. However, limited attention to ad hoc modifications impairs investigators’ ability to develop evidence-based hypotheses about how such modifications may impact intervention effectiveness and cost. We propose a multi-method process map methodology to facilitate the systematic data collection necessary to characterize ad hoc modifications that may impact primary intervention outcomes. METHODS: We employ process maps (drawn from systems science), as well as focus groups and semi-structured interviews (drawn from social sciences) to investigate ad hoc modifications. Focus groups are conducted with the protocol’s developers and/or planners (the implementation team) to characterize the protocol “as envisioned,” while interviews conducted with frontline administrators characterize the process “as realized in practice.” Process maps with both samples are used to identify when modifications occurred across a protocol-driven intervention. A case study investigating a multistage screening protocol for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is presented to illustrate application and utility of the multi-method process maps. RESULTS: In this case study, frontline administrators reported ad hoc modifications that potentially influenced the primary study outcome (e.g., time to ASD diagnosis). Ad hoc modifications occurred to accommodate (1) whether providers and/or parents were concerned about ASD, (2) perceptions of parental readiness to discuss ASD, and (3) perceptions of family service delivery needs and priorities. CONCLUSION: Investigation of ad hoc modifications on primary outcomes offers new opportunities to develop empirically based adaptive interventions. Routine reporting standards are critical to provide full transparency when studying ad hoc modifications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7348036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73480362020-07-20 Multi-method process maps: An interdisciplinary approach to investigate ad hoc modifications in protocol-driven interventions Mackie, Thomas I. Ramella, Leah Schaefer, Ana J. Sridhar, Monica Carter, Alice S. Eisenhower, Abbey Ibitamuno, Grace T. Petruccelli, Marisa Hudson, Shawna V. Sheldrick, R. Christopher J Clin Transl Sci Research Article INTRODUCTION: Implementation scientists increasingly recognize that the process of implementation is dynamic, leading to ad hoc modifications that may challenge fidelity in protocol-driven interventions. However, limited attention to ad hoc modifications impairs investigators’ ability to develop evidence-based hypotheses about how such modifications may impact intervention effectiveness and cost. We propose a multi-method process map methodology to facilitate the systematic data collection necessary to characterize ad hoc modifications that may impact primary intervention outcomes. METHODS: We employ process maps (drawn from systems science), as well as focus groups and semi-structured interviews (drawn from social sciences) to investigate ad hoc modifications. Focus groups are conducted with the protocol’s developers and/or planners (the implementation team) to characterize the protocol “as envisioned,” while interviews conducted with frontline administrators characterize the process “as realized in practice.” Process maps with both samples are used to identify when modifications occurred across a protocol-driven intervention. A case study investigating a multistage screening protocol for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is presented to illustrate application and utility of the multi-method process maps. RESULTS: In this case study, frontline administrators reported ad hoc modifications that potentially influenced the primary study outcome (e.g., time to ASD diagnosis). Ad hoc modifications occurred to accommodate (1) whether providers and/or parents were concerned about ASD, (2) perceptions of parental readiness to discuss ASD, and (3) perceptions of family service delivery needs and priorities. CONCLUSION: Investigation of ad hoc modifications on primary outcomes offers new opportunities to develop empirically based adaptive interventions. Routine reporting standards are critical to provide full transparency when studying ad hoc modifications. Cambridge University Press 2020-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7348036/ /pubmed/32695498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.14 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mackie, Thomas I.
Ramella, Leah
Schaefer, Ana J.
Sridhar, Monica
Carter, Alice S.
Eisenhower, Abbey
Ibitamuno, Grace T.
Petruccelli, Marisa
Hudson, Shawna V.
Sheldrick, R. Christopher
Multi-method process maps: An interdisciplinary approach to investigate ad hoc modifications in protocol-driven interventions
title Multi-method process maps: An interdisciplinary approach to investigate ad hoc modifications in protocol-driven interventions
title_full Multi-method process maps: An interdisciplinary approach to investigate ad hoc modifications in protocol-driven interventions
title_fullStr Multi-method process maps: An interdisciplinary approach to investigate ad hoc modifications in protocol-driven interventions
title_full_unstemmed Multi-method process maps: An interdisciplinary approach to investigate ad hoc modifications in protocol-driven interventions
title_short Multi-method process maps: An interdisciplinary approach to investigate ad hoc modifications in protocol-driven interventions
title_sort multi-method process maps: an interdisciplinary approach to investigate ad hoc modifications in protocol-driven interventions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.14
work_keys_str_mv AT mackiethomasi multimethodprocessmapsaninterdisciplinaryapproachtoinvestigateadhocmodificationsinprotocoldriveninterventions
AT ramellaleah multimethodprocessmapsaninterdisciplinaryapproachtoinvestigateadhocmodificationsinprotocoldriveninterventions
AT schaeferanaj multimethodprocessmapsaninterdisciplinaryapproachtoinvestigateadhocmodificationsinprotocoldriveninterventions
AT sridharmonica multimethodprocessmapsaninterdisciplinaryapproachtoinvestigateadhocmodificationsinprotocoldriveninterventions
AT carteralices multimethodprocessmapsaninterdisciplinaryapproachtoinvestigateadhocmodificationsinprotocoldriveninterventions
AT eisenhowerabbey multimethodprocessmapsaninterdisciplinaryapproachtoinvestigateadhocmodificationsinprotocoldriveninterventions
AT ibitamunogracet multimethodprocessmapsaninterdisciplinaryapproachtoinvestigateadhocmodificationsinprotocoldriveninterventions
AT petruccellimarisa multimethodprocessmapsaninterdisciplinaryapproachtoinvestigateadhocmodificationsinprotocoldriveninterventions
AT hudsonshawnav multimethodprocessmapsaninterdisciplinaryapproachtoinvestigateadhocmodificationsinprotocoldriveninterventions
AT sheldrickrchristopher multimethodprocessmapsaninterdisciplinaryapproachtoinvestigateadhocmodificationsinprotocoldriveninterventions