Cargando…

Variability in hospital treatment costs: a time-driven activity-based costing approach for early-stage invasive breast cancer patients

OBJECTIVES: Using a standardised diagnostic and generic treatment path for breast cancer, and the molecular subtype perspective, we aim to measure the impact of several patient and disease characteristics on the overall treatment cost for patients. Additionally, we aim to generate insights into the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roman, Erin, Cardoen, Brecht, Decloedt, Jan, Roodhooft, Filip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32641325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035389
_version_ 1783556789436940288
author Roman, Erin
Cardoen, Brecht
Decloedt, Jan
Roodhooft, Filip
author_facet Roman, Erin
Cardoen, Brecht
Decloedt, Jan
Roodhooft, Filip
author_sort Roman, Erin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Using a standardised diagnostic and generic treatment path for breast cancer, and the molecular subtype perspective, we aim to measure the impact of several patient and disease characteristics on the overall treatment cost for patients. Additionally, we aim to generate insights into the drivers of cost variability within one medical domain. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a retrospective study at a breast clinic in Belgium. We used 14 anonymous patient files for conducting our analysis. RESULTS: Significant cost variations within each molecular subtype and across molecular subtypes were found. For the luminal A classification, the cost differential amounts to roughly 166%, with the greatest treatment cost amounting to US$29 780 relative to US$11 208 for a patient requiring fewer medical activities. The major driver for these cost variations relates to disease characteristics. For the luminal B classification, a cost difference of roughly 242% exists due to both disease-related and patient-related factors. The average treatment cost for triple negative patients amounted to US$26 923, this is considered to be a more aggressive type of cancer. The overall cost for HER2-enriched is driven by the inclusion of Herceptin, thus this subtype is impacted by disease characteristics. Cost variability across molecular classifications is impacted by the severity of the disease, thus disease-related factors are the major drivers of cost. CONCLUSIONS: Given the cost challenge in healthcare, the need for greater cost transparency has become imperative. Through our analysis, we generate initial insights into the drivers of cost variability for breast cancer. We found evidence that disease characteristics such as severity and more aggressive cancer forms such as HER2-enriched and triple negative have a significant impact on treatment cost across the different subtypes. Similarly, patient factors such as age and presence of gene mutation contribute to differences in treatment cost variability within molecular subtypes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7348323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73483232020-07-14 Variability in hospital treatment costs: a time-driven activity-based costing approach for early-stage invasive breast cancer patients Roman, Erin Cardoen, Brecht Decloedt, Jan Roodhooft, Filip BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVES: Using a standardised diagnostic and generic treatment path for breast cancer, and the molecular subtype perspective, we aim to measure the impact of several patient and disease characteristics on the overall treatment cost for patients. Additionally, we aim to generate insights into the drivers of cost variability within one medical domain. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a retrospective study at a breast clinic in Belgium. We used 14 anonymous patient files for conducting our analysis. RESULTS: Significant cost variations within each molecular subtype and across molecular subtypes were found. For the luminal A classification, the cost differential amounts to roughly 166%, with the greatest treatment cost amounting to US$29 780 relative to US$11 208 for a patient requiring fewer medical activities. The major driver for these cost variations relates to disease characteristics. For the luminal B classification, a cost difference of roughly 242% exists due to both disease-related and patient-related factors. The average treatment cost for triple negative patients amounted to US$26 923, this is considered to be a more aggressive type of cancer. The overall cost for HER2-enriched is driven by the inclusion of Herceptin, thus this subtype is impacted by disease characteristics. Cost variability across molecular classifications is impacted by the severity of the disease, thus disease-related factors are the major drivers of cost. CONCLUSIONS: Given the cost challenge in healthcare, the need for greater cost transparency has become imperative. Through our analysis, we generate initial insights into the drivers of cost variability for breast cancer. We found evidence that disease characteristics such as severity and more aggressive cancer forms such as HER2-enriched and triple negative have a significant impact on treatment cost across the different subtypes. Similarly, patient factors such as age and presence of gene mutation contribute to differences in treatment cost variability within molecular subtypes. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7348323/ /pubmed/32641325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035389 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Economics
Roman, Erin
Cardoen, Brecht
Decloedt, Jan
Roodhooft, Filip
Variability in hospital treatment costs: a time-driven activity-based costing approach for early-stage invasive breast cancer patients
title Variability in hospital treatment costs: a time-driven activity-based costing approach for early-stage invasive breast cancer patients
title_full Variability in hospital treatment costs: a time-driven activity-based costing approach for early-stage invasive breast cancer patients
title_fullStr Variability in hospital treatment costs: a time-driven activity-based costing approach for early-stage invasive breast cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Variability in hospital treatment costs: a time-driven activity-based costing approach for early-stage invasive breast cancer patients
title_short Variability in hospital treatment costs: a time-driven activity-based costing approach for early-stage invasive breast cancer patients
title_sort variability in hospital treatment costs: a time-driven activity-based costing approach for early-stage invasive breast cancer patients
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32641325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035389
work_keys_str_mv AT romanerin variabilityinhospitaltreatmentcostsatimedrivenactivitybasedcostingapproachforearlystageinvasivebreastcancerpatients
AT cardoenbrecht variabilityinhospitaltreatmentcostsatimedrivenactivitybasedcostingapproachforearlystageinvasivebreastcancerpatients
AT decloedtjan variabilityinhospitaltreatmentcostsatimedrivenactivitybasedcostingapproachforearlystageinvasivebreastcancerpatients
AT roodhooftfilip variabilityinhospitaltreatmentcostsatimedrivenactivitybasedcostingapproachforearlystageinvasivebreastcancerpatients