Cargando…

提高维持治疗强度对Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期儿童青少年淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤患者预后的影响

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of intensified maintenance therapy on the prognosis of children and adolescents with advanced lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL). METHODS: Retrospective analysis on the treatment results of children and adolescents with stage Ⅲ and stage Ⅳ LBL who underwent BFM-NHL-90/...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29081195
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.09.009
_version_ 1783556801049919488
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of intensified maintenance therapy on the prognosis of children and adolescents with advanced lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL). METHODS: Retrospective analysis on the treatment results of children and adolescents with stage Ⅲ and stage Ⅳ LBL who underwent BFM-NHL-90/-95 regimen without prophylactic radiotherapy. The intensified therapy group included the patients admitted from 1998 to 2005, while others were classified as the non-intensified therapy group. Patients in the intensified therapy group were intravenously treated with “etoposide phosphate plus cytrarabine” and high-dose methotrexate alternately per 2.5–3 months in addition to the oral chemotherapy with 6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate during the maintenance phase. RESULTS: A total of 187 LBL patients were enrolled. The rates of 5-year event free survival were (76.9 ± 5.8) % and (77.9 ± 4.3) % (χ(2)=0.249, P=0.617) respectively, in the intensified therapy (n=52) and the non-intensified therapy groups (n=135), while the rates of 5-year overall survival of them were (78.8 ± 5.7) % and (79.8±4.1) % (χ(2)=0.353, P=0.552), respectively. Stratified by stage, immunological type as well as risk stratification, the rates of long-term survival were similar between the two groups. During the maintenance phase, the rates of grade Ⅲ and Ⅳ myelosuppression in the intensified therapy and the non-intensified maintenance groups were 55.8% and 18.5%, respectively (χ(2)=25.363, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Intensified maintenance therapy failed to improve the prognosis of patients with advanced LBL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7348356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73483562020-07-16 提高维持治疗强度对Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期儿童青少年淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤患者预后的影响 Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 论著 OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of intensified maintenance therapy on the prognosis of children and adolescents with advanced lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL). METHODS: Retrospective analysis on the treatment results of children and adolescents with stage Ⅲ and stage Ⅳ LBL who underwent BFM-NHL-90/-95 regimen without prophylactic radiotherapy. The intensified therapy group included the patients admitted from 1998 to 2005, while others were classified as the non-intensified therapy group. Patients in the intensified therapy group were intravenously treated with “etoposide phosphate plus cytrarabine” and high-dose methotrexate alternately per 2.5–3 months in addition to the oral chemotherapy with 6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate during the maintenance phase. RESULTS: A total of 187 LBL patients were enrolled. The rates of 5-year event free survival were (76.9 ± 5.8) % and (77.9 ± 4.3) % (χ(2)=0.249, P=0.617) respectively, in the intensified therapy (n=52) and the non-intensified therapy groups (n=135), while the rates of 5-year overall survival of them were (78.8 ± 5.7) % and (79.8±4.1) % (χ(2)=0.353, P=0.552), respectively. Stratified by stage, immunological type as well as risk stratification, the rates of long-term survival were similar between the two groups. During the maintenance phase, the rates of grade Ⅲ and Ⅳ myelosuppression in the intensified therapy and the non-intensified maintenance groups were 55.8% and 18.5%, respectively (χ(2)=25.363, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Intensified maintenance therapy failed to improve the prognosis of patients with advanced LBL. Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2017-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7348356/ /pubmed/29081195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.09.009 Text en 2017年版权归中华医学会所有 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal.
spellingShingle 论著
提高维持治疗强度对Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期儿童青少年淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤患者预后的影响
title 提高维持治疗强度对Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期儿童青少年淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤患者预后的影响
title_full 提高维持治疗强度对Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期儿童青少年淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤患者预后的影响
title_fullStr 提高维持治疗强度对Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期儿童青少年淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤患者预后的影响
title_full_unstemmed 提高维持治疗强度对Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期儿童青少年淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤患者预后的影响
title_short 提高维持治疗强度对Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期儿童青少年淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤患者预后的影响
title_sort 提高维持治疗强度对ⅲ期和ⅳ期儿童青少年淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤患者预后的影响
topic 论著
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29081195
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.09.009
work_keys_str_mv AT tígāowéichízhìliáoqiángdùduìiiiqīhéivqīértóngqīngshǎoniánlínbāmǔxìbāolínbāliúhuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT tígāowéichízhìliáoqiángdùduìiiiqīhéivqīértóngqīngshǎoniánlínbāmǔxìbāolínbāliúhuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT tígāowéichízhìliáoqiángdùduìiiiqīhéivqīértóngqīngshǎoniánlínbāmǔxìbāolínbāliúhuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT tígāowéichízhìliáoqiángdùduìiiiqīhéivqīértóngqīngshǎoniánlínbāmǔxìbāolínbāliúhuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT tígāowéichízhìliáoqiángdùduìiiiqīhéivqīértóngqīngshǎoniánlínbāmǔxìbāolínbāliúhuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT tígāowéichízhìliáoqiángdùduìiiiqīhéivqīértóngqīngshǎoniánlínbāmǔxìbāolínbāliúhuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT tígāowéichízhìliáoqiángdùduìiiiqīhéivqīértóngqīngshǎoniánlínbāmǔxìbāolínbāliúhuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT tígāowéichízhìliáoqiángdùduìiiiqīhéivqīértóngqīngshǎoniánlínbāmǔxìbāolínbāliúhuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT tígāowéichízhìliáoqiángdùduìiiiqīhéivqīértóngqīngshǎoniánlínbāmǔxìbāolínbāliúhuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT tígāowéichízhìliáoqiángdùduìiiiqīhéivqīértóngqīngshǎoniánlínbāmǔxìbāolínbāliúhuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT tígāowéichízhìliáoqiángdùduìiiiqīhéivqīértóngqīngshǎoniánlínbāmǔxìbāolínbāliúhuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT tígāowéichízhìliáoqiángdùduìiiiqīhéivqīértóngqīngshǎoniánlínbāmǔxìbāolínbāliúhuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng