Cargando…

原发免疫性血小板减少症患者出血风险与血小板活化的相关性分析

OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between platelet activation and the degree of bleeding in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). METHODS: 43 patients with ITP were assessed based on ITP-BAT bleeding grading system. Platelet membrane glycoproteins (GP) Ⅰb, GPⅡb/Ⅲa and P-selectin ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28219222
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.01.007
_version_ 1783556817558700032
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between platelet activation and the degree of bleeding in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). METHODS: 43 patients with ITP were assessed based on ITP-BAT bleeding grading system. Platelet membrane glycoproteins (GP) Ⅰb, GPⅡb/Ⅲa and P-selectin expression were detected by flow cytometry analysis with and without adenosine diphosphate (ADP) stimulation. Association of platelet activation with platelet count, immature platelet fraction (IPF), bleeding severity were evaluated. RESULTS: GPⅡb/Ⅲa and P-selection expressions on unstimulated platelet in ITP patients were higher than those in healthy controls (65.69±10.73 vs 7.16±0.99, t=4.130, P<0.001; 15.43±1.41 vs 12.55±1.03, t=2.070, P=0.043, respectively), and GPⅠb expression was lower than that in healthy controls (240.11±24.93 vs 295.11±22.15, t=2.417, P=0.020). Comparatively to healthy individuals, following ADP stimulation, GPⅡb/Ⅲa expression in ITP patients increased (133.96±12.17 vs 39.67±4.99, t=5.256, P<0.001), whereas GPⅠb and P-selection expressions decreased (37.09±3.94 vs 109.77±23.66, t=3.901, P<0.001; 149.06±19.14 vs 205.73±21.00, t=2.070, P=0.043, respectively). ADP-stimulated GPⅠb, ADP-stimulated and unstimulated P-selection, proportion of GPⅠb, P-selection levels with/without ADP stimulation were significantly associated with platelet counts (P<0.05). ADP-stimulated P-selection and proportion of P-selection levels with/without ADP stimulation were significantly associated with IPF (P<0.05). There were significant differences in the expressions of unstimulated P-selection, ADP-stimulated P-selection, ADP-stimulated GPⅠb stratified by bleeding grades (P<0.05). The ratios of P-selection, GPⅡb/Ⅲa and GPⅠb with/without ADP stimulation in ITP patients were significantly different among various bleeding grades (P<0.05). Higher proportion of GPⅠb with/without ADP stimulation was associated with higher risk of bleeding (OR=3.05, P=0.011). Lower proportion of GPⅡb/Ⅲa and P-selection with/without ADP was associated with higher risk of bleeding (OR=0.32, P=0.023; OR=0.04, P=0.006, respectively). CONCLUSION: Platelet activation index could accurately assess the degree of bleeding in patients with ITP, and also be used as the observation index and reference index for treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7348401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73484012020-07-16 原发免疫性血小板减少症患者出血风险与血小板活化的相关性分析 Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 论著 OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between platelet activation and the degree of bleeding in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). METHODS: 43 patients with ITP were assessed based on ITP-BAT bleeding grading system. Platelet membrane glycoproteins (GP) Ⅰb, GPⅡb/Ⅲa and P-selectin expression were detected by flow cytometry analysis with and without adenosine diphosphate (ADP) stimulation. Association of platelet activation with platelet count, immature platelet fraction (IPF), bleeding severity were evaluated. RESULTS: GPⅡb/Ⅲa and P-selection expressions on unstimulated platelet in ITP patients were higher than those in healthy controls (65.69±10.73 vs 7.16±0.99, t=4.130, P<0.001; 15.43±1.41 vs 12.55±1.03, t=2.070, P=0.043, respectively), and GPⅠb expression was lower than that in healthy controls (240.11±24.93 vs 295.11±22.15, t=2.417, P=0.020). Comparatively to healthy individuals, following ADP stimulation, GPⅡb/Ⅲa expression in ITP patients increased (133.96±12.17 vs 39.67±4.99, t=5.256, P<0.001), whereas GPⅠb and P-selection expressions decreased (37.09±3.94 vs 109.77±23.66, t=3.901, P<0.001; 149.06±19.14 vs 205.73±21.00, t=2.070, P=0.043, respectively). ADP-stimulated GPⅠb, ADP-stimulated and unstimulated P-selection, proportion of GPⅠb, P-selection levels with/without ADP stimulation were significantly associated with platelet counts (P<0.05). ADP-stimulated P-selection and proportion of P-selection levels with/without ADP stimulation were significantly associated with IPF (P<0.05). There were significant differences in the expressions of unstimulated P-selection, ADP-stimulated P-selection, ADP-stimulated GPⅠb stratified by bleeding grades (P<0.05). The ratios of P-selection, GPⅡb/Ⅲa and GPⅠb with/without ADP stimulation in ITP patients were significantly different among various bleeding grades (P<0.05). Higher proportion of GPⅠb with/without ADP stimulation was associated with higher risk of bleeding (OR=3.05, P=0.011). Lower proportion of GPⅡb/Ⅲa and P-selection with/without ADP was associated with higher risk of bleeding (OR=0.32, P=0.023; OR=0.04, P=0.006, respectively). CONCLUSION: Platelet activation index could accurately assess the degree of bleeding in patients with ITP, and also be used as the observation index and reference index for treatment. Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2017-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7348401/ /pubmed/28219222 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.01.007 Text en 2017年版权归中华医学会所有 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal.
spellingShingle 论著
原发免疫性血小板减少症患者出血风险与血小板活化的相关性分析
title 原发免疫性血小板减少症患者出血风险与血小板活化的相关性分析
title_full 原发免疫性血小板减少症患者出血风险与血小板活化的相关性分析
title_fullStr 原发免疫性血小板减少症患者出血风险与血小板活化的相关性分析
title_full_unstemmed 原发免疫性血小板减少症患者出血风险与血小板活化的相关性分析
title_short 原发免疫性血小板减少症患者出血风险与血小板活化的相关性分析
title_sort 原发免疫性血小板减少症患者出血风险与血小板活化的相关性分析
topic 论著
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28219222
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.01.007
work_keys_str_mv AT yuánfāmiǎnyìxìngxuèxiǎobǎnjiǎnshǎozhènghuànzhěchūxuèfēngxiǎnyǔxuèxiǎobǎnhuóhuàdexiāngguānxìngfēnxī
AT yuánfāmiǎnyìxìngxuèxiǎobǎnjiǎnshǎozhènghuànzhěchūxuèfēngxiǎnyǔxuèxiǎobǎnhuóhuàdexiāngguānxìngfēnxī
AT yuánfāmiǎnyìxìngxuèxiǎobǎnjiǎnshǎozhènghuànzhěchūxuèfēngxiǎnyǔxuèxiǎobǎnhuóhuàdexiāngguānxìngfēnxī
AT yuánfāmiǎnyìxìngxuèxiǎobǎnjiǎnshǎozhènghuànzhěchūxuèfēngxiǎnyǔxuèxiǎobǎnhuóhuàdexiāngguānxìngfēnxī
AT yuánfāmiǎnyìxìngxuèxiǎobǎnjiǎnshǎozhènghuànzhěchūxuèfēngxiǎnyǔxuèxiǎobǎnhuóhuàdexiāngguānxìngfēnxī
AT yuánfāmiǎnyìxìngxuèxiǎobǎnjiǎnshǎozhènghuànzhěchūxuèfēngxiǎnyǔxuèxiǎobǎnhuóhuàdexiāngguānxìngfēnxī
AT yuánfāmiǎnyìxìngxuèxiǎobǎnjiǎnshǎozhènghuànzhěchūxuèfēngxiǎnyǔxuèxiǎobǎnhuóhuàdexiāngguānxìngfēnxī