Cargando…
NCCN危险分层对异基因造血干细胞移植治疗的急性髓系白血病患者预后的影响
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of NCCN (2015) risk stratification on prognosis of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 258 patients with AML in CR (186 cases in CR(1), 72 cases in CR(2))...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28219225 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.01.010 |
_version_ | 1783556820554481664 |
---|---|
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of NCCN (2015) risk stratification on prognosis of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 258 patients with AML in CR (186 cases in CR(1), 72 cases in CR(2)) who underwent allogeneic HSCT in our hospital between April 2012 and March 2015 according to NCCN (2015) risk stratification. Of them, 63 cases were classified as low risk, 112 cases intermediate risk and 83 cases high risk. RESULTS: ①With the median follow up of 18 (5–41) months, two-year disease free surviva (DFS) in 258 patients was 78.0% (95% CI 60.4%–96.6%). Two-year DFS in AML after transplantation was 78.6% (95% CI 61.0%–96.2%) in low risk, 76.0% (95% CI 84.0%–93.6%) in intermediate risk and 80.3% (95% CI 62.7%–97.9%) (P=0.886) in high risk groups respectively. ②Univariate analysis showed that DFS has no significant difference in patient age, the median disease course before HSCT, the WBC number at the beginning of the disease, blood routine and chromosomes examination before transplantation, extramedullary disease before transplantation, disease status before transplantation, conditioning regimen, donor type, donor and recipient sex, recipient blood type, transfused MNC number, transfused CD34(+) cell number and transfused CD3(+) cell number. DFS was significant lower in primary AML than that in secondary AML (P=0.006) and also lower in MRD positive than that in MRD negative (P=0.003). The accumulative relapse was significant higher in CR(2) compared to that in CR(1) (P=0.046). Accumulative non-relapse mortality (NRM) was significanlyt higher in secondary AML compared to that in primary AML (P=0.004) and also higher in MRD positive compared to that in MRD negative (P=0.010). ③Multivariate analysis showed that MRD positive was the only significant factor in DFS and NRM. CONCLUSION: Allo-HSCT treatment of AML CR patients could achieve a high efficacy, which is similar between CR(1) and CR(2) patients. There is no significant correlation between NCCN (2015) risk stratification and the prognosis of AML patients with allo-HSCT treatment. Pre-conditioning MRD status monitored by multiparameter flow cytometry was the only impact factor on DFS and NRM in allo-HSCT for CR-AML patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7348409 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73484092020-07-16 NCCN危险分层对异基因造血干细胞移植治疗的急性髓系白血病患者预后的影响 Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 论著 OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of NCCN (2015) risk stratification on prognosis of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 258 patients with AML in CR (186 cases in CR(1), 72 cases in CR(2)) who underwent allogeneic HSCT in our hospital between April 2012 and March 2015 according to NCCN (2015) risk stratification. Of them, 63 cases were classified as low risk, 112 cases intermediate risk and 83 cases high risk. RESULTS: ①With the median follow up of 18 (5–41) months, two-year disease free surviva (DFS) in 258 patients was 78.0% (95% CI 60.4%–96.6%). Two-year DFS in AML after transplantation was 78.6% (95% CI 61.0%–96.2%) in low risk, 76.0% (95% CI 84.0%–93.6%) in intermediate risk and 80.3% (95% CI 62.7%–97.9%) (P=0.886) in high risk groups respectively. ②Univariate analysis showed that DFS has no significant difference in patient age, the median disease course before HSCT, the WBC number at the beginning of the disease, blood routine and chromosomes examination before transplantation, extramedullary disease before transplantation, disease status before transplantation, conditioning regimen, donor type, donor and recipient sex, recipient blood type, transfused MNC number, transfused CD34(+) cell number and transfused CD3(+) cell number. DFS was significant lower in primary AML than that in secondary AML (P=0.006) and also lower in MRD positive than that in MRD negative (P=0.003). The accumulative relapse was significant higher in CR(2) compared to that in CR(1) (P=0.046). Accumulative non-relapse mortality (NRM) was significanlyt higher in secondary AML compared to that in primary AML (P=0.004) and also higher in MRD positive compared to that in MRD negative (P=0.010). ③Multivariate analysis showed that MRD positive was the only significant factor in DFS and NRM. CONCLUSION: Allo-HSCT treatment of AML CR patients could achieve a high efficacy, which is similar between CR(1) and CR(2) patients. There is no significant correlation between NCCN (2015) risk stratification and the prognosis of AML patients with allo-HSCT treatment. Pre-conditioning MRD status monitored by multiparameter flow cytometry was the only impact factor on DFS and NRM in allo-HSCT for CR-AML patients. Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2017-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7348409/ /pubmed/28219225 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.01.010 Text en 2017年版权归中华医学会所有 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal. |
spellingShingle | 论著 NCCN危险分层对异基因造血干细胞移植治疗的急性髓系白血病患者预后的影响 |
title | NCCN危险分层对异基因造血干细胞移植治疗的急性髓系白血病患者预后的影响 |
title_full | NCCN危险分层对异基因造血干细胞移植治疗的急性髓系白血病患者预后的影响 |
title_fullStr | NCCN危险分层对异基因造血干细胞移植治疗的急性髓系白血病患者预后的影响 |
title_full_unstemmed | NCCN危险分层对异基因造血干细胞移植治疗的急性髓系白血病患者预后的影响 |
title_short | NCCN危险分层对异基因造血干细胞移植治疗的急性髓系白血病患者预后的影响 |
title_sort | nccn危险分层对异基因造血干细胞移植治疗的急性髓系白血病患者预后的影响 |
topic | 论著 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28219225 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.01.010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nccnwēixiǎnfēncéngduìyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáodejíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng AT nccnwēixiǎnfēncéngduìyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáodejíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng AT nccnwēixiǎnfēncéngduìyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáodejíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng AT nccnwēixiǎnfēncéngduìyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáodejíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng AT nccnwēixiǎnfēncéngduìyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáodejíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng AT nccnwēixiǎnfēncéngduìyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáodejíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng AT nccnwēixiǎnfēncéngduìyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáodejíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng AT nccnwēixiǎnfēncéngduìyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáodejíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng AT nccnwēixiǎnfēncéngduìyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáodejíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng AT nccnwēixiǎnfēncéngduìyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáodejíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng AT nccnwēixiǎnfēncéngduìyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáodejíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng AT nccnwēixiǎnfēncéngduìyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáodejíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng AT nccnwēixiǎnfēncéngduìyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáodejíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng AT nccnwēixiǎnfēncéngduìyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáodejíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng AT nccnwēixiǎnfēncéngduìyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáodejíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng AT nccnwēixiǎnfēncéngduìyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáodejíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng |