Cargando…
Provision of medical assistance in dying: a scoping review
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to map the characteristics of the existing medical literature describing the medications, settings, participants and outcomes of medical assistance in dying (MAID) in order to identify knowledge gaps and areas for future research. DESIGN: Scoping review. SEAR...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32641328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036054 |
_version_ | 1783556828642148352 |
---|---|
author | Zworth, Max Saleh, Carol Ball, Ian Kalles, Gaelen Chkaroubo, Anatoli Kekewich, Mike Miller, Paul Q Dees, Marianne Frolic, Andrea Oczkowski, Simon |
author_facet | Zworth, Max Saleh, Carol Ball, Ian Kalles, Gaelen Chkaroubo, Anatoli Kekewich, Mike Miller, Paul Q Dees, Marianne Frolic, Andrea Oczkowski, Simon |
author_sort | Zworth, Max |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to map the characteristics of the existing medical literature describing the medications, settings, participants and outcomes of medical assistance in dying (MAID) in order to identify knowledge gaps and areas for future research. DESIGN: Scoping review. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and CENTRAL), clinical trial registries, conference abstracts and professional guidelines from jurisdictions where MAID is legal, up to February 2020. Eligible report types included technical summaries, institutional policies, practice surveys, practice guidelines and clinical studies that describe MAID provision in adults who have provided informed consent for MAID. RESULTS: 163 articles published between 1989 and 2020 met eligibility criteria. 75 studies described details for MAID administered by intravenous medications and 50 studies provided data on oral medications. In intravenous protocols, MAID was most commonly administered using a barbiturate (34/163) or propofol (22/163) followed by a neuromuscular blocker. Oral protocols most often used barbiturates alone (37/163) or in conjunction with an opioid medication (7/163) and often recommended using a prokinetic agent prior to lethal drug ingestion. Complications included prolonged duration of the dying process, difficulty in obtaining intravenous access and difficulty in swallowing oral agents. Most commonly, the role of physicians was prescribing (83/163) and administering medications (75/163). Nurses’ roles included administering medications (17/163) and supporting the patient (16/163) or family (13/163). The role of families involved providing support to the patient (17/163) and bringing medications from the pharmacy for self-administration (4/163). CONCLUSIONS: We identified several trends in MAID provision including common medications and doses for oral and parenteral administration, roles of healthcare professionals and families, and complications that may cause patient, family and provider distress. Future research should aim to identify the medications, dosages, and administration techniques and procedures that produce the most predictable outcomes and mitigate distress for those involved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7348461 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73484612020-07-14 Provision of medical assistance in dying: a scoping review Zworth, Max Saleh, Carol Ball, Ian Kalles, Gaelen Chkaroubo, Anatoli Kekewich, Mike Miller, Paul Q Dees, Marianne Frolic, Andrea Oczkowski, Simon BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to map the characteristics of the existing medical literature describing the medications, settings, participants and outcomes of medical assistance in dying (MAID) in order to identify knowledge gaps and areas for future research. DESIGN: Scoping review. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and CENTRAL), clinical trial registries, conference abstracts and professional guidelines from jurisdictions where MAID is legal, up to February 2020. Eligible report types included technical summaries, institutional policies, practice surveys, practice guidelines and clinical studies that describe MAID provision in adults who have provided informed consent for MAID. RESULTS: 163 articles published between 1989 and 2020 met eligibility criteria. 75 studies described details for MAID administered by intravenous medications and 50 studies provided data on oral medications. In intravenous protocols, MAID was most commonly administered using a barbiturate (34/163) or propofol (22/163) followed by a neuromuscular blocker. Oral protocols most often used barbiturates alone (37/163) or in conjunction with an opioid medication (7/163) and often recommended using a prokinetic agent prior to lethal drug ingestion. Complications included prolonged duration of the dying process, difficulty in obtaining intravenous access and difficulty in swallowing oral agents. Most commonly, the role of physicians was prescribing (83/163) and administering medications (75/163). Nurses’ roles included administering medications (17/163) and supporting the patient (16/163) or family (13/163). The role of families involved providing support to the patient (17/163) and bringing medications from the pharmacy for self-administration (4/163). CONCLUSIONS: We identified several trends in MAID provision including common medications and doses for oral and parenteral administration, roles of healthcare professionals and families, and complications that may cause patient, family and provider distress. Future research should aim to identify the medications, dosages, and administration techniques and procedures that produce the most predictable outcomes and mitigate distress for those involved. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7348461/ /pubmed/32641328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036054 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Evidence Based Practice Zworth, Max Saleh, Carol Ball, Ian Kalles, Gaelen Chkaroubo, Anatoli Kekewich, Mike Miller, Paul Q Dees, Marianne Frolic, Andrea Oczkowski, Simon Provision of medical assistance in dying: a scoping review |
title | Provision of medical assistance in dying: a scoping review |
title_full | Provision of medical assistance in dying: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Provision of medical assistance in dying: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Provision of medical assistance in dying: a scoping review |
title_short | Provision of medical assistance in dying: a scoping review |
title_sort | provision of medical assistance in dying: a scoping review |
topic | Evidence Based Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32641328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036054 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zworthmax provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingascopingreview AT salehcarol provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingascopingreview AT ballian provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingascopingreview AT kallesgaelen provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingascopingreview AT chkarouboanatoli provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingascopingreview AT kekewichmike provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingascopingreview AT millerpaulq provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingascopingreview AT deesmarianne provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingascopingreview AT frolicandrea provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingascopingreview AT oczkowskisimon provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingascopingreview |