Cargando…

Provision of medical assistance in dying: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to map the characteristics of the existing medical literature describing the medications, settings, participants and outcomes of medical assistance in dying (MAID) in order to identify knowledge gaps and areas for future research. DESIGN: Scoping review. SEAR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zworth, Max, Saleh, Carol, Ball, Ian, Kalles, Gaelen, Chkaroubo, Anatoli, Kekewich, Mike, Miller, Paul Q, Dees, Marianne, Frolic, Andrea, Oczkowski, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32641328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036054
_version_ 1783556828642148352
author Zworth, Max
Saleh, Carol
Ball, Ian
Kalles, Gaelen
Chkaroubo, Anatoli
Kekewich, Mike
Miller, Paul Q
Dees, Marianne
Frolic, Andrea
Oczkowski, Simon
author_facet Zworth, Max
Saleh, Carol
Ball, Ian
Kalles, Gaelen
Chkaroubo, Anatoli
Kekewich, Mike
Miller, Paul Q
Dees, Marianne
Frolic, Andrea
Oczkowski, Simon
author_sort Zworth, Max
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to map the characteristics of the existing medical literature describing the medications, settings, participants and outcomes of medical assistance in dying (MAID) in order to identify knowledge gaps and areas for future research. DESIGN: Scoping review. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and CENTRAL), clinical trial registries, conference abstracts and professional guidelines from jurisdictions where MAID is legal, up to February 2020. Eligible report types included technical summaries, institutional policies, practice surveys, practice guidelines and clinical studies that describe MAID provision in adults who have provided informed consent for MAID. RESULTS: 163 articles published between 1989 and 2020 met eligibility criteria. 75 studies described details for MAID administered by intravenous medications and 50 studies provided data on oral medications. In intravenous protocols, MAID was most commonly administered using a barbiturate (34/163) or propofol (22/163) followed by a neuromuscular blocker. Oral protocols most often used barbiturates alone (37/163) or in conjunction with an opioid medication (7/163) and often recommended using a prokinetic agent prior to lethal drug ingestion. Complications included prolonged duration of the dying process, difficulty in obtaining intravenous access and difficulty in swallowing oral agents. Most commonly, the role of physicians was prescribing (83/163) and administering medications (75/163). Nurses’ roles included administering medications (17/163) and supporting the patient (16/163) or family (13/163). The role of families involved providing support to the patient (17/163) and bringing medications from the pharmacy for self-administration (4/163). CONCLUSIONS: We identified several trends in MAID provision including common medications and doses for oral and parenteral administration, roles of healthcare professionals and families, and complications that may cause patient, family and provider distress. Future research should aim to identify the medications, dosages, and administration techniques and procedures that produce the most predictable outcomes and mitigate distress for those involved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7348461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73484612020-07-14 Provision of medical assistance in dying: a scoping review Zworth, Max Saleh, Carol Ball, Ian Kalles, Gaelen Chkaroubo, Anatoli Kekewich, Mike Miller, Paul Q Dees, Marianne Frolic, Andrea Oczkowski, Simon BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to map the characteristics of the existing medical literature describing the medications, settings, participants and outcomes of medical assistance in dying (MAID) in order to identify knowledge gaps and areas for future research. DESIGN: Scoping review. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and CENTRAL), clinical trial registries, conference abstracts and professional guidelines from jurisdictions where MAID is legal, up to February 2020. Eligible report types included technical summaries, institutional policies, practice surveys, practice guidelines and clinical studies that describe MAID provision in adults who have provided informed consent for MAID. RESULTS: 163 articles published between 1989 and 2020 met eligibility criteria. 75 studies described details for MAID administered by intravenous medications and 50 studies provided data on oral medications. In intravenous protocols, MAID was most commonly administered using a barbiturate (34/163) or propofol (22/163) followed by a neuromuscular blocker. Oral protocols most often used barbiturates alone (37/163) or in conjunction with an opioid medication (7/163) and often recommended using a prokinetic agent prior to lethal drug ingestion. Complications included prolonged duration of the dying process, difficulty in obtaining intravenous access and difficulty in swallowing oral agents. Most commonly, the role of physicians was prescribing (83/163) and administering medications (75/163). Nurses’ roles included administering medications (17/163) and supporting the patient (16/163) or family (13/163). The role of families involved providing support to the patient (17/163) and bringing medications from the pharmacy for self-administration (4/163). CONCLUSIONS: We identified several trends in MAID provision including common medications and doses for oral and parenteral administration, roles of healthcare professionals and families, and complications that may cause patient, family and provider distress. Future research should aim to identify the medications, dosages, and administration techniques and procedures that produce the most predictable outcomes and mitigate distress for those involved. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7348461/ /pubmed/32641328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036054 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
Zworth, Max
Saleh, Carol
Ball, Ian
Kalles, Gaelen
Chkaroubo, Anatoli
Kekewich, Mike
Miller, Paul Q
Dees, Marianne
Frolic, Andrea
Oczkowski, Simon
Provision of medical assistance in dying: a scoping review
title Provision of medical assistance in dying: a scoping review
title_full Provision of medical assistance in dying: a scoping review
title_fullStr Provision of medical assistance in dying: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Provision of medical assistance in dying: a scoping review
title_short Provision of medical assistance in dying: a scoping review
title_sort provision of medical assistance in dying: a scoping review
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32641328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036054
work_keys_str_mv AT zworthmax provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingascopingreview
AT salehcarol provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingascopingreview
AT ballian provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingascopingreview
AT kallesgaelen provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingascopingreview
AT chkarouboanatoli provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingascopingreview
AT kekewichmike provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingascopingreview
AT millerpaulq provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingascopingreview
AT deesmarianne provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingascopingreview
AT frolicandrea provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingascopingreview
AT oczkowskisimon provisionofmedicalassistanceindyingascopingreview