Cargando…

不同剂量去甲氧柔红霉素联合阿糖胞苷诱导治疗年轻初发急性髓系白血病的疗效和安全性分析

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety and long-term prognosis between different dose idarubicin (IDA) combined with cytarabine (IA) as induction chemotherapy in newly diagnosed young patients of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). METHODS: A total of 149 newly diagnosed young AML patients (APL exclud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27587250
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2016.08.010
_version_ 1783556850410586112
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety and long-term prognosis between different dose idarubicin (IDA) combined with cytarabine (IA) as induction chemotherapy in newly diagnosed young patients of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). METHODS: A total of 149 newly diagnosed young AML patients (APL excluded) between January 2009 to July 2014 was enrolled. According to the dose of IDA, the patients were divided into three groups, high standard-dose IA group (10–12 mg · m (−2) · d(−1)), low standard-dose IA group (8–9 mg·m(−2)·d(−1)) and low-dose IA group (<8 mg·m(−2)·d(−1)). The efficacy, adverse effects and long-term prognosis among the three groups were compared. RESULTS: Of them, 34 patients were in high standard-dose IA group, 53 in low standard-dose IA group and 62 in low-dose IA group. After one cycle of induction chemotherapy, the complete remission (CR) rate was 79.4%, 75.5% and 46.8%, the overall response (OR) rate was 97.1%, 94.3% and 64.5%, and the overall CR rate was 85.3%, 81.1% and 54.8%, respectively. Compared with low-dose IA group, high standard-dose IA group and low standard-dose IA group had significantly better result (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the latter two groups (P>0.05). Multivariate analysis also showed that standard-dose IA was favorable factor for induction chemotherapy (P<0.05). The adverse effects were similar in the three group, other than the lowest count of WBC (P=0.002). Low standard-dose IA can improve the OS compared to the low-dose IA (P=0.003), but EFS, RFS was similar in the three groups. CONCLUSION: For the newly diagnosed young(<55) AML patients, the standard-dose IA has better CR rate. The adverse effects were similar in the three groups. High-dose IA may improve the OS compared to the low-dose IA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7348532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73485322020-07-16 不同剂量去甲氧柔红霉素联合阿糖胞苷诱导治疗年轻初发急性髓系白血病的疗效和安全性分析 Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 论著 OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety and long-term prognosis between different dose idarubicin (IDA) combined with cytarabine (IA) as induction chemotherapy in newly diagnosed young patients of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). METHODS: A total of 149 newly diagnosed young AML patients (APL excluded) between January 2009 to July 2014 was enrolled. According to the dose of IDA, the patients were divided into three groups, high standard-dose IA group (10–12 mg · m (−2) · d(−1)), low standard-dose IA group (8–9 mg·m(−2)·d(−1)) and low-dose IA group (<8 mg·m(−2)·d(−1)). The efficacy, adverse effects and long-term prognosis among the three groups were compared. RESULTS: Of them, 34 patients were in high standard-dose IA group, 53 in low standard-dose IA group and 62 in low-dose IA group. After one cycle of induction chemotherapy, the complete remission (CR) rate was 79.4%, 75.5% and 46.8%, the overall response (OR) rate was 97.1%, 94.3% and 64.5%, and the overall CR rate was 85.3%, 81.1% and 54.8%, respectively. Compared with low-dose IA group, high standard-dose IA group and low standard-dose IA group had significantly better result (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the latter two groups (P>0.05). Multivariate analysis also showed that standard-dose IA was favorable factor for induction chemotherapy (P<0.05). The adverse effects were similar in the three group, other than the lowest count of WBC (P=0.002). Low standard-dose IA can improve the OS compared to the low-dose IA (P=0.003), but EFS, RFS was similar in the three groups. CONCLUSION: For the newly diagnosed young(<55) AML patients, the standard-dose IA has better CR rate. The adverse effects were similar in the three groups. High-dose IA may improve the OS compared to the low-dose IA. Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2016-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7348532/ /pubmed/27587250 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2016.08.010 Text en 2016年版权归中华医学会所有 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal.
spellingShingle 论著
不同剂量去甲氧柔红霉素联合阿糖胞苷诱导治疗年轻初发急性髓系白血病的疗效和安全性分析
title 不同剂量去甲氧柔红霉素联合阿糖胞苷诱导治疗年轻初发急性髓系白血病的疗效和安全性分析
title_full 不同剂量去甲氧柔红霉素联合阿糖胞苷诱导治疗年轻初发急性髓系白血病的疗效和安全性分析
title_fullStr 不同剂量去甲氧柔红霉素联合阿糖胞苷诱导治疗年轻初发急性髓系白血病的疗效和安全性分析
title_full_unstemmed 不同剂量去甲氧柔红霉素联合阿糖胞苷诱导治疗年轻初发急性髓系白血病的疗效和安全性分析
title_short 不同剂量去甲氧柔红霉素联合阿糖胞苷诱导治疗年轻初发急性髓系白血病的疗效和安全性分析
title_sort 不同剂量去甲氧柔红霉素联合阿糖胞苷诱导治疗年轻初发急性髓系白血病的疗效和安全性分析
topic 论著
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27587250
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2016.08.010
work_keys_str_mv AT bùtóngjìliàngqùjiǎyǎngróuhóngméisùliánhéātángbāogānyòudǎozhìliáoniánqīngchūfājíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàohéānquánxìngfēnxī
AT bùtóngjìliàngqùjiǎyǎngróuhóngméisùliánhéātángbāogānyòudǎozhìliáoniánqīngchūfājíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàohéānquánxìngfēnxī
AT bùtóngjìliàngqùjiǎyǎngróuhóngméisùliánhéātángbāogānyòudǎozhìliáoniánqīngchūfājíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàohéānquánxìngfēnxī
AT bùtóngjìliàngqùjiǎyǎngróuhóngméisùliánhéātángbāogānyòudǎozhìliáoniánqīngchūfājíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàohéānquánxìngfēnxī
AT bùtóngjìliàngqùjiǎyǎngróuhóngméisùliánhéātángbāogānyòudǎozhìliáoniánqīngchūfājíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàohéānquánxìngfēnxī
AT bùtóngjìliàngqùjiǎyǎngróuhóngméisùliánhéātángbāogānyòudǎozhìliáoniánqīngchūfājíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàohéānquánxìngfēnxī
AT bùtóngjìliàngqùjiǎyǎngróuhóngméisùliánhéātángbāogānyòudǎozhìliáoniánqīngchūfājíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàohéānquánxìngfēnxī
AT bùtóngjìliàngqùjiǎyǎngróuhóngméisùliánhéātángbāogānyòudǎozhìliáoniánqīngchūfājíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàohéānquánxìngfēnxī
AT bùtóngjìliàngqùjiǎyǎngróuhóngméisùliánhéātángbāogānyòudǎozhìliáoniánqīngchūfājíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàohéānquánxìngfēnxī
AT bùtóngjìliàngqùjiǎyǎngróuhóngméisùliánhéātángbāogānyòudǎozhìliáoniánqīngchūfājíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàohéānquánxìngfēnxī
AT bùtóngjìliàngqùjiǎyǎngróuhóngméisùliánhéātángbāogānyòudǎozhìliáoniánqīngchūfājíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàohéānquánxìngfēnxī
AT bùtóngjìliàngqùjiǎyǎngróuhóngméisùliánhéātángbāogānyòudǎozhìliáoniánqīngchūfājíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàohéānquánxìngfēnxī