Cargando…
Monitoring Response to Home Parenteral Nutrition in Adult Cancer Patients
Current guidelines recommend home parenteral nutrition (HPN) for cancer patients with chronic deficiencies of dietary intake or absorption when enteral nutrition is not adequate or feasible in suitable patients. HPN has been shown to slow down progressive weight loss and improve nutritional status,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32585965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8020183 |
_version_ | 1783556940882771968 |
---|---|
author | Cotogni, Paolo Caccialanza, Riccardo Pedrazzoli, Paolo Bozzetti, Federico De Francesco, Antonella |
author_facet | Cotogni, Paolo Caccialanza, Riccardo Pedrazzoli, Paolo Bozzetti, Federico De Francesco, Antonella |
author_sort | Cotogni, Paolo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current guidelines recommend home parenteral nutrition (HPN) for cancer patients with chronic deficiencies of dietary intake or absorption when enteral nutrition is not adequate or feasible in suitable patients. HPN has been shown to slow down progressive weight loss and improve nutritional status, but limited information is available on the monitoring practice of cancer patients on HPN. Clinical management of these patients based only on nutritional status is incomplete. Moreover, some commonly used clinical parameters to monitor patients (weight loss, body weight, body mass index, and oral food intake) do not accurately reflect patient’s body composition, while bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a validated tool to properly assess nutritional status on a regular basis. Therefore, patient’s monitoring should rely on other affordable indicators such as Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) to also assess patient’s functional status and prognosis. Finally, catheter-related complications and quality of life represent crucial issues to be monitored over time. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe the role and relevance of monitoring cancer patients on HPN, regardless of whether they are receiving anticancer treatments. These practical tips may be clinically useful to better guide healthcare providers in the nutritional care of these patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7348909 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73489092020-07-22 Monitoring Response to Home Parenteral Nutrition in Adult Cancer Patients Cotogni, Paolo Caccialanza, Riccardo Pedrazzoli, Paolo Bozzetti, Federico De Francesco, Antonella Healthcare (Basel) Review Current guidelines recommend home parenteral nutrition (HPN) for cancer patients with chronic deficiencies of dietary intake or absorption when enteral nutrition is not adequate or feasible in suitable patients. HPN has been shown to slow down progressive weight loss and improve nutritional status, but limited information is available on the monitoring practice of cancer patients on HPN. Clinical management of these patients based only on nutritional status is incomplete. Moreover, some commonly used clinical parameters to monitor patients (weight loss, body weight, body mass index, and oral food intake) do not accurately reflect patient’s body composition, while bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a validated tool to properly assess nutritional status on a regular basis. Therefore, patient’s monitoring should rely on other affordable indicators such as Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) to also assess patient’s functional status and prognosis. Finally, catheter-related complications and quality of life represent crucial issues to be monitored over time. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe the role and relevance of monitoring cancer patients on HPN, regardless of whether they are receiving anticancer treatments. These practical tips may be clinically useful to better guide healthcare providers in the nutritional care of these patients. MDPI 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7348909/ /pubmed/32585965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8020183 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Cotogni, Paolo Caccialanza, Riccardo Pedrazzoli, Paolo Bozzetti, Federico De Francesco, Antonella Monitoring Response to Home Parenteral Nutrition in Adult Cancer Patients |
title | Monitoring Response to Home Parenteral Nutrition in Adult Cancer Patients |
title_full | Monitoring Response to Home Parenteral Nutrition in Adult Cancer Patients |
title_fullStr | Monitoring Response to Home Parenteral Nutrition in Adult Cancer Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Monitoring Response to Home Parenteral Nutrition in Adult Cancer Patients |
title_short | Monitoring Response to Home Parenteral Nutrition in Adult Cancer Patients |
title_sort | monitoring response to home parenteral nutrition in adult cancer patients |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32585965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8020183 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cotognipaolo monitoringresponsetohomeparenteralnutritioninadultcancerpatients AT caccialanzariccardo monitoringresponsetohomeparenteralnutritioninadultcancerpatients AT pedrazzolipaolo monitoringresponsetohomeparenteralnutritioninadultcancerpatients AT bozzettifederico monitoringresponsetohomeparenteralnutritioninadultcancerpatients AT defrancescoantonella monitoringresponsetohomeparenteralnutritioninadultcancerpatients |