Cargando…

Monitoring Response to Home Parenteral Nutrition in Adult Cancer Patients

Current guidelines recommend home parenteral nutrition (HPN) for cancer patients with chronic deficiencies of dietary intake or absorption when enteral nutrition is not adequate or feasible in suitable patients. HPN has been shown to slow down progressive weight loss and improve nutritional status,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cotogni, Paolo, Caccialanza, Riccardo, Pedrazzoli, Paolo, Bozzetti, Federico, De Francesco, Antonella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32585965
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8020183
_version_ 1783556940882771968
author Cotogni, Paolo
Caccialanza, Riccardo
Pedrazzoli, Paolo
Bozzetti, Federico
De Francesco, Antonella
author_facet Cotogni, Paolo
Caccialanza, Riccardo
Pedrazzoli, Paolo
Bozzetti, Federico
De Francesco, Antonella
author_sort Cotogni, Paolo
collection PubMed
description Current guidelines recommend home parenteral nutrition (HPN) for cancer patients with chronic deficiencies of dietary intake or absorption when enteral nutrition is not adequate or feasible in suitable patients. HPN has been shown to slow down progressive weight loss and improve nutritional status, but limited information is available on the monitoring practice of cancer patients on HPN. Clinical management of these patients based only on nutritional status is incomplete. Moreover, some commonly used clinical parameters to monitor patients (weight loss, body weight, body mass index, and oral food intake) do not accurately reflect patient’s body composition, while bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a validated tool to properly assess nutritional status on a regular basis. Therefore, patient’s monitoring should rely on other affordable indicators such as Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) to also assess patient’s functional status and prognosis. Finally, catheter-related complications and quality of life represent crucial issues to be monitored over time. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe the role and relevance of monitoring cancer patients on HPN, regardless of whether they are receiving anticancer treatments. These practical tips may be clinically useful to better guide healthcare providers in the nutritional care of these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7348909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73489092020-07-22 Monitoring Response to Home Parenteral Nutrition in Adult Cancer Patients Cotogni, Paolo Caccialanza, Riccardo Pedrazzoli, Paolo Bozzetti, Federico De Francesco, Antonella Healthcare (Basel) Review Current guidelines recommend home parenteral nutrition (HPN) for cancer patients with chronic deficiencies of dietary intake or absorption when enteral nutrition is not adequate or feasible in suitable patients. HPN has been shown to slow down progressive weight loss and improve nutritional status, but limited information is available on the monitoring practice of cancer patients on HPN. Clinical management of these patients based only on nutritional status is incomplete. Moreover, some commonly used clinical parameters to monitor patients (weight loss, body weight, body mass index, and oral food intake) do not accurately reflect patient’s body composition, while bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a validated tool to properly assess nutritional status on a regular basis. Therefore, patient’s monitoring should rely on other affordable indicators such as Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) to also assess patient’s functional status and prognosis. Finally, catheter-related complications and quality of life represent crucial issues to be monitored over time. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe the role and relevance of monitoring cancer patients on HPN, regardless of whether they are receiving anticancer treatments. These practical tips may be clinically useful to better guide healthcare providers in the nutritional care of these patients. MDPI 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7348909/ /pubmed/32585965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8020183 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Cotogni, Paolo
Caccialanza, Riccardo
Pedrazzoli, Paolo
Bozzetti, Federico
De Francesco, Antonella
Monitoring Response to Home Parenteral Nutrition in Adult Cancer Patients
title Monitoring Response to Home Parenteral Nutrition in Adult Cancer Patients
title_full Monitoring Response to Home Parenteral Nutrition in Adult Cancer Patients
title_fullStr Monitoring Response to Home Parenteral Nutrition in Adult Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring Response to Home Parenteral Nutrition in Adult Cancer Patients
title_short Monitoring Response to Home Parenteral Nutrition in Adult Cancer Patients
title_sort monitoring response to home parenteral nutrition in adult cancer patients
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7348909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32585965
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8020183
work_keys_str_mv AT cotognipaolo monitoringresponsetohomeparenteralnutritioninadultcancerpatients
AT caccialanzariccardo monitoringresponsetohomeparenteralnutritioninadultcancerpatients
AT pedrazzolipaolo monitoringresponsetohomeparenteralnutritioninadultcancerpatients
AT bozzettifederico monitoringresponsetohomeparenteralnutritioninadultcancerpatients
AT defrancescoantonella monitoringresponsetohomeparenteralnutritioninadultcancerpatients