Cargando…

Bone remodeling after conservative treatment of nasal bone fracture in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment of nasal bone fractures in pediatric patients is closed reduction. Conservative treatment is sometimes performed, but poses a risk of nasal deformity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of bone remodeling in pediatric nasal fractures. METHODS: Infor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Won Ki, Han, Dong Gil, Kim, Sung-Eun, Lee, Yong Jig, Shim, Jeong Su
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7349139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32630988
http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2020.00192
_version_ 1783556993296891904
author Kang, Won Ki
Han, Dong Gil
Kim, Sung-Eun
Lee, Yong Jig
Shim, Jeong Su
author_facet Kang, Won Ki
Han, Dong Gil
Kim, Sung-Eun
Lee, Yong Jig
Shim, Jeong Su
author_sort Kang, Won Ki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The standard treatment of nasal bone fractures in pediatric patients is closed reduction. Conservative treatment is sometimes performed, but poses a risk of nasal deformity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of bone remodeling in pediatric nasal fractures. METHODS: Information was extracted from the medical records of patients under 12 years of age who received conservative treatment for a nasal bone fracture and underwent follow-up computed tomography (CT) examinations. The initial fracture and its outcomes over time were graded as excellent, good, or fair according to the malalignment, displacement, or irregularity of the fractured segments. The outcomes of remodeling were evaluated through changes in the grade of the fracture between initial and subsequent CT scans. RESULTS: The review identified 16 patients between March 2015 and December 2019. Their mean age was 6.2 years, and the average follow-up period was 4.9 months. Three of the five patients with a plane I frontal impact showed improved outcomes of remodeling from good to excellent, and the remaining two patients, improved from fair to good. Eight of the 11 patients with plane I lateral impacts showed improved outcomes, from good to excellent, while one patient, improved from fair to good, one patient, improved from fair to excellent, and one patient showed no interval changes. CONCLUSION: In 15 of these 16 patients with non-severe fractures, the bony contour improved through remodeling, without surgical intervention. Therefore, we suggest that conservative treatment is a feasible option for mild pediatric nasal fractures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7349139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73491392020-07-20 Bone remodeling after conservative treatment of nasal bone fracture in pediatric patients Kang, Won Ki Han, Dong Gil Kim, Sung-Eun Lee, Yong Jig Shim, Jeong Su Arch Craniofac Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: The standard treatment of nasal bone fractures in pediatric patients is closed reduction. Conservative treatment is sometimes performed, but poses a risk of nasal deformity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of bone remodeling in pediatric nasal fractures. METHODS: Information was extracted from the medical records of patients under 12 years of age who received conservative treatment for a nasal bone fracture and underwent follow-up computed tomography (CT) examinations. The initial fracture and its outcomes over time were graded as excellent, good, or fair according to the malalignment, displacement, or irregularity of the fractured segments. The outcomes of remodeling were evaluated through changes in the grade of the fracture between initial and subsequent CT scans. RESULTS: The review identified 16 patients between March 2015 and December 2019. Their mean age was 6.2 years, and the average follow-up period was 4.9 months. Three of the five patients with a plane I frontal impact showed improved outcomes of remodeling from good to excellent, and the remaining two patients, improved from fair to good. Eight of the 11 patients with plane I lateral impacts showed improved outcomes, from good to excellent, while one patient, improved from fair to good, one patient, improved from fair to excellent, and one patient showed no interval changes. CONCLUSION: In 15 of these 16 patients with non-severe fractures, the bony contour improved through remodeling, without surgical intervention. Therefore, we suggest that conservative treatment is a feasible option for mild pediatric nasal fractures. Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association 2020-06 2020-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7349139/ /pubmed/32630988 http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2020.00192 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kang, Won Ki
Han, Dong Gil
Kim, Sung-Eun
Lee, Yong Jig
Shim, Jeong Su
Bone remodeling after conservative treatment of nasal bone fracture in pediatric patients
title Bone remodeling after conservative treatment of nasal bone fracture in pediatric patients
title_full Bone remodeling after conservative treatment of nasal bone fracture in pediatric patients
title_fullStr Bone remodeling after conservative treatment of nasal bone fracture in pediatric patients
title_full_unstemmed Bone remodeling after conservative treatment of nasal bone fracture in pediatric patients
title_short Bone remodeling after conservative treatment of nasal bone fracture in pediatric patients
title_sort bone remodeling after conservative treatment of nasal bone fracture in pediatric patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7349139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32630988
http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2020.00192
work_keys_str_mv AT kangwonki boneremodelingafterconservativetreatmentofnasalbonefractureinpediatricpatients
AT handonggil boneremodelingafterconservativetreatmentofnasalbonefractureinpediatricpatients
AT kimsungeun boneremodelingafterconservativetreatmentofnasalbonefractureinpediatricpatients
AT leeyongjig boneremodelingafterconservativetreatmentofnasalbonefractureinpediatricpatients
AT shimjeongsu boneremodelingafterconservativetreatmentofnasalbonefractureinpediatricpatients