Cargando…

Mobile X-ray Outside the Hospital vs. X-ray at the Hospital Challenges Exposed in an Explorative RCT Study

Background: For frail patients, it may sometimes be preferable to carry out X-ray examinations at the patients’ own home. The general state of such patients may worsen due to transport and change of environment when transported for examination at the hospital. Objective: The aim of the randomized co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toppenberg, Maria, Christiansen, Thomas, Rasmussen, Finn, Nielsen, Camilla, Damsgaard, Else Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7349166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32365932
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8020118
_version_ 1783556999427915776
author Toppenberg, Maria
Christiansen, Thomas
Rasmussen, Finn
Nielsen, Camilla
Damsgaard, Else Marie
author_facet Toppenberg, Maria
Christiansen, Thomas
Rasmussen, Finn
Nielsen, Camilla
Damsgaard, Else Marie
author_sort Toppenberg, Maria
collection PubMed
description Background: For frail patients, it may sometimes be preferable to carry out X-ray examinations at the patients’ own home. The general state of such patients may worsen due to transport and change of environment when transported for examination at the hospital. Objective: The aim of the randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to investigate if mobile X-ray improves healthcare for fragile patients. The primary outcome was the number of hospitalizations. Data sources: We collected all data using questionnaires and data from the Electronic Patient Record (ER). Participants: Patients referred to a mobile X-ray examination living in nursing homes and homes for the elderly in the Aarhus Municipality (Denmark). Intervention: mobile X-ray examinations compared to those at the hospital. Study appraisal: Data were collected and stored using the computer programme Redcap. Stata was used for statistical calculations. One hundred and thirty-six patients were included in the RCT. We did not find significant differences between mobile X-ray (intervention) and X-ray at the hospital (control) concerning hospitalizations and number of hospital days. Challenges: We met several challenges when carrying out RCT in the planned study population. Doctors often withdraw the referral when they found out that their patient should go to the hospital instead of mobile X-ray. The nursing home staff often considered the patient too frail to allow the test person to ask questions post X-ray. We also met challenges in the randomization method resulting in bias in the first data collection, so we had to adjust the randomization method. Conclusions: For the fragile patients in the present explorative study, mobile X-ray did not significantly reduce the number of hospitalizations compared to X-ray at the hospital. Yet, mobile X-ray may be a new important diagnostic tool for more precise treatment to the frailest patients for whom transportation to the hospital is too exhausting. We need studies with focus on this aspect. We also recommend future RCT studies in a population for which mobile X-ray has not yet been a possibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7349166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73491662020-07-22 Mobile X-ray Outside the Hospital vs. X-ray at the Hospital Challenges Exposed in an Explorative RCT Study Toppenberg, Maria Christiansen, Thomas Rasmussen, Finn Nielsen, Camilla Damsgaard, Else Marie Healthcare (Basel) Article Background: For frail patients, it may sometimes be preferable to carry out X-ray examinations at the patients’ own home. The general state of such patients may worsen due to transport and change of environment when transported for examination at the hospital. Objective: The aim of the randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to investigate if mobile X-ray improves healthcare for fragile patients. The primary outcome was the number of hospitalizations. Data sources: We collected all data using questionnaires and data from the Electronic Patient Record (ER). Participants: Patients referred to a mobile X-ray examination living in nursing homes and homes for the elderly in the Aarhus Municipality (Denmark). Intervention: mobile X-ray examinations compared to those at the hospital. Study appraisal: Data were collected and stored using the computer programme Redcap. Stata was used for statistical calculations. One hundred and thirty-six patients were included in the RCT. We did not find significant differences between mobile X-ray (intervention) and X-ray at the hospital (control) concerning hospitalizations and number of hospital days. Challenges: We met several challenges when carrying out RCT in the planned study population. Doctors often withdraw the referral when they found out that their patient should go to the hospital instead of mobile X-ray. The nursing home staff often considered the patient too frail to allow the test person to ask questions post X-ray. We also met challenges in the randomization method resulting in bias in the first data collection, so we had to adjust the randomization method. Conclusions: For the fragile patients in the present explorative study, mobile X-ray did not significantly reduce the number of hospitalizations compared to X-ray at the hospital. Yet, mobile X-ray may be a new important diagnostic tool for more precise treatment to the frailest patients for whom transportation to the hospital is too exhausting. We need studies with focus on this aspect. We also recommend future RCT studies in a population for which mobile X-ray has not yet been a possibility. MDPI 2020-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7349166/ /pubmed/32365932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8020118 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Toppenberg, Maria
Christiansen, Thomas
Rasmussen, Finn
Nielsen, Camilla
Damsgaard, Else Marie
Mobile X-ray Outside the Hospital vs. X-ray at the Hospital Challenges Exposed in an Explorative RCT Study
title Mobile X-ray Outside the Hospital vs. X-ray at the Hospital Challenges Exposed in an Explorative RCT Study
title_full Mobile X-ray Outside the Hospital vs. X-ray at the Hospital Challenges Exposed in an Explorative RCT Study
title_fullStr Mobile X-ray Outside the Hospital vs. X-ray at the Hospital Challenges Exposed in an Explorative RCT Study
title_full_unstemmed Mobile X-ray Outside the Hospital vs. X-ray at the Hospital Challenges Exposed in an Explorative RCT Study
title_short Mobile X-ray Outside the Hospital vs. X-ray at the Hospital Challenges Exposed in an Explorative RCT Study
title_sort mobile x-ray outside the hospital vs. x-ray at the hospital challenges exposed in an explorative rct study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7349166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32365932
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8020118
work_keys_str_mv AT toppenbergmaria mobilexrayoutsidethehospitalvsxrayatthehospitalchallengesexposedinanexplorativerctstudy
AT christiansenthomas mobilexrayoutsidethehospitalvsxrayatthehospitalchallengesexposedinanexplorativerctstudy
AT rasmussenfinn mobilexrayoutsidethehospitalvsxrayatthehospitalchallengesexposedinanexplorativerctstudy
AT nielsencamilla mobilexrayoutsidethehospitalvsxrayatthehospitalchallengesexposedinanexplorativerctstudy
AT damsgaardelsemarie mobilexrayoutsidethehospitalvsxrayatthehospitalchallengesexposedinanexplorativerctstudy