Cargando…

Slug Monitoring and Impacts on the Ground Beetle Community in the Frame of Sustainable Pest Control in Conventional and Conservation Agroecosystems

In conservation agriculture, slugs are considered significant pests and their monitoring is a key option in the integrated pest management framework. Together with molluscicide applications, predators such as ground beetles can offer a tool for slug control in the field. Through the evaluation of sl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scaccini, Davide, Panini, Michela, Chiesa, Olga, Nicoli Aldini, Rinaldo, Tabaglio, Vincenzo, Mazzoni, Emanuele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7349495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32570919
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects11060380
_version_ 1783557067856936960
author Scaccini, Davide
Panini, Michela
Chiesa, Olga
Nicoli Aldini, Rinaldo
Tabaglio, Vincenzo
Mazzoni, Emanuele
author_facet Scaccini, Davide
Panini, Michela
Chiesa, Olga
Nicoli Aldini, Rinaldo
Tabaglio, Vincenzo
Mazzoni, Emanuele
author_sort Scaccini, Davide
collection PubMed
description In conservation agriculture, slugs are considered significant pests and their monitoring is a key option in the integrated pest management framework. Together with molluscicide applications, predators such as ground beetles can offer a tool for slug control in the field. Through the evaluation of slug and ground beetle monitoring strategies, this work compared their presence in conventional and conservation agricultural plots. The invasive Deroceras invadens was the dominant slug species to occur in all sampling periods. Among Carabidae, Poecilus cupreus and Pterostichus melas were the most abundant species, and Bembidion spp., Brachinus spp., and Harpalus spp. were also common. Beer-baited pitfall traps, whatever their alcoholic content, caught more slugs and ground beetles than wooden boards used as shelters. Slugs were more abundant in conventional plots than in conservation plots, possibly due to the lower presence of natural enemies such as ground beetles. Despite possible impacts on Carabidae, beer-baited pitfall traps should be considered a useful tool for slug monitoring and for the planning of molluscicide applications. Soil management such as minimum- or no-tillage and the presence of cover crops are important elements influencing both slug and ground beetle presence, possibly playing a key role in the maintenance of natural enemy populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7349495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73494952020-07-14 Slug Monitoring and Impacts on the Ground Beetle Community in the Frame of Sustainable Pest Control in Conventional and Conservation Agroecosystems Scaccini, Davide Panini, Michela Chiesa, Olga Nicoli Aldini, Rinaldo Tabaglio, Vincenzo Mazzoni, Emanuele Insects Article In conservation agriculture, slugs are considered significant pests and their monitoring is a key option in the integrated pest management framework. Together with molluscicide applications, predators such as ground beetles can offer a tool for slug control in the field. Through the evaluation of slug and ground beetle monitoring strategies, this work compared their presence in conventional and conservation agricultural plots. The invasive Deroceras invadens was the dominant slug species to occur in all sampling periods. Among Carabidae, Poecilus cupreus and Pterostichus melas were the most abundant species, and Bembidion spp., Brachinus spp., and Harpalus spp. were also common. Beer-baited pitfall traps, whatever their alcoholic content, caught more slugs and ground beetles than wooden boards used as shelters. Slugs were more abundant in conventional plots than in conservation plots, possibly due to the lower presence of natural enemies such as ground beetles. Despite possible impacts on Carabidae, beer-baited pitfall traps should be considered a useful tool for slug monitoring and for the planning of molluscicide applications. Soil management such as minimum- or no-tillage and the presence of cover crops are important elements influencing both slug and ground beetle presence, possibly playing a key role in the maintenance of natural enemy populations. MDPI 2020-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7349495/ /pubmed/32570919 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects11060380 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Scaccini, Davide
Panini, Michela
Chiesa, Olga
Nicoli Aldini, Rinaldo
Tabaglio, Vincenzo
Mazzoni, Emanuele
Slug Monitoring and Impacts on the Ground Beetle Community in the Frame of Sustainable Pest Control in Conventional and Conservation Agroecosystems
title Slug Monitoring and Impacts on the Ground Beetle Community in the Frame of Sustainable Pest Control in Conventional and Conservation Agroecosystems
title_full Slug Monitoring and Impacts on the Ground Beetle Community in the Frame of Sustainable Pest Control in Conventional and Conservation Agroecosystems
title_fullStr Slug Monitoring and Impacts on the Ground Beetle Community in the Frame of Sustainable Pest Control in Conventional and Conservation Agroecosystems
title_full_unstemmed Slug Monitoring and Impacts on the Ground Beetle Community in the Frame of Sustainable Pest Control in Conventional and Conservation Agroecosystems
title_short Slug Monitoring and Impacts on the Ground Beetle Community in the Frame of Sustainable Pest Control in Conventional and Conservation Agroecosystems
title_sort slug monitoring and impacts on the ground beetle community in the frame of sustainable pest control in conventional and conservation agroecosystems
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7349495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32570919
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects11060380
work_keys_str_mv AT scaccinidavide slugmonitoringandimpactsonthegroundbeetlecommunityintheframeofsustainablepestcontrolinconventionalandconservationagroecosystems
AT paninimichela slugmonitoringandimpactsonthegroundbeetlecommunityintheframeofsustainablepestcontrolinconventionalandconservationagroecosystems
AT chiesaolga slugmonitoringandimpactsonthegroundbeetlecommunityintheframeofsustainablepestcontrolinconventionalandconservationagroecosystems
AT nicolialdinirinaldo slugmonitoringandimpactsonthegroundbeetlecommunityintheframeofsustainablepestcontrolinconventionalandconservationagroecosystems
AT tabagliovincenzo slugmonitoringandimpactsonthegroundbeetlecommunityintheframeofsustainablepestcontrolinconventionalandconservationagroecosystems
AT mazzoniemanuele slugmonitoringandimpactsonthegroundbeetlecommunityintheframeofsustainablepestcontrolinconventionalandconservationagroecosystems