Cargando…
Reliability and Validity of a Novel Wearable Device for Measuring Elbow Strength
Muscle strength is an important clinical outcome in rehabilitation and sport medicine, but options are limited to expensive but accurate isokinetic dynamometry (IKD) or inexpensive but less accurate hand-held dynamometers (HHD). A wearable, self-stabilizing, limb strength measurement device (LSMD) w...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7349842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32560409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20123412 |
_version_ | 1783557148337242112 |
---|---|
author | Brookshaw, Marcus Sexton, Andrew McGibbon, Chris A. |
author_facet | Brookshaw, Marcus Sexton, Andrew McGibbon, Chris A. |
author_sort | Brookshaw, Marcus |
collection | PubMed |
description | Muscle strength is an important clinical outcome in rehabilitation and sport medicine, but options are limited to expensive but accurate isokinetic dynamometry (IKD) or inexpensive but less accurate hand-held dynamometers (HHD). A wearable, self-stabilizing, limb strength measurement device (LSMD) was developed to fill the current gap in portable strength measurement devices. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the LSMD in healthy adults. Twenty healthy adults were recruited to attend two strength testing sessions where elbow flexor and extensor strength was measured with the LSMD, with HHD and with IKD in random order, by two raters. Outcomes were intra-rater repeatability, inter-rater reproducibility and inter-session reproducibility using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Limits of agreement and weighted least products regression were used to test the validity of the LSMD relative to the criterion standard (IKD), and calibration formulas derived to improve measurement fidelity. ICC values for the LSMD were >0.90 for all measures of reliability and for both muscle groups, but over-predicted extensor strength and under-predicted flexor strength. Validity was established by transforming the data with the criterion standard-based calibration. These data indicate that the LSMD is reliable and conditionally valid for quantifying strength of elbow flexors and extensors in a healthy adult population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7349842 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73498422020-07-15 Reliability and Validity of a Novel Wearable Device for Measuring Elbow Strength Brookshaw, Marcus Sexton, Andrew McGibbon, Chris A. Sensors (Basel) Article Muscle strength is an important clinical outcome in rehabilitation and sport medicine, but options are limited to expensive but accurate isokinetic dynamometry (IKD) or inexpensive but less accurate hand-held dynamometers (HHD). A wearable, self-stabilizing, limb strength measurement device (LSMD) was developed to fill the current gap in portable strength measurement devices. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the LSMD in healthy adults. Twenty healthy adults were recruited to attend two strength testing sessions where elbow flexor and extensor strength was measured with the LSMD, with HHD and with IKD in random order, by two raters. Outcomes were intra-rater repeatability, inter-rater reproducibility and inter-session reproducibility using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Limits of agreement and weighted least products regression were used to test the validity of the LSMD relative to the criterion standard (IKD), and calibration formulas derived to improve measurement fidelity. ICC values for the LSMD were >0.90 for all measures of reliability and for both muscle groups, but over-predicted extensor strength and under-predicted flexor strength. Validity was established by transforming the data with the criterion standard-based calibration. These data indicate that the LSMD is reliable and conditionally valid for quantifying strength of elbow flexors and extensors in a healthy adult population. MDPI 2020-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7349842/ /pubmed/32560409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20123412 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Brookshaw, Marcus Sexton, Andrew McGibbon, Chris A. Reliability and Validity of a Novel Wearable Device for Measuring Elbow Strength |
title | Reliability and Validity of a Novel Wearable Device for Measuring Elbow Strength |
title_full | Reliability and Validity of a Novel Wearable Device for Measuring Elbow Strength |
title_fullStr | Reliability and Validity of a Novel Wearable Device for Measuring Elbow Strength |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and Validity of a Novel Wearable Device for Measuring Elbow Strength |
title_short | Reliability and Validity of a Novel Wearable Device for Measuring Elbow Strength |
title_sort | reliability and validity of a novel wearable device for measuring elbow strength |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7349842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32560409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20123412 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brookshawmarcus reliabilityandvalidityofanovelwearabledeviceformeasuringelbowstrength AT sextonandrew reliabilityandvalidityofanovelwearabledeviceformeasuringelbowstrength AT mcgibbonchrisa reliabilityandvalidityofanovelwearabledeviceformeasuringelbowstrength |