Cargando…

Reliability and Validity of a Novel Wearable Device for Measuring Elbow Strength

Muscle strength is an important clinical outcome in rehabilitation and sport medicine, but options are limited to expensive but accurate isokinetic dynamometry (IKD) or inexpensive but less accurate hand-held dynamometers (HHD). A wearable, self-stabilizing, limb strength measurement device (LSMD) w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brookshaw, Marcus, Sexton, Andrew, McGibbon, Chris A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7349842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32560409
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20123412
_version_ 1783557148337242112
author Brookshaw, Marcus
Sexton, Andrew
McGibbon, Chris A.
author_facet Brookshaw, Marcus
Sexton, Andrew
McGibbon, Chris A.
author_sort Brookshaw, Marcus
collection PubMed
description Muscle strength is an important clinical outcome in rehabilitation and sport medicine, but options are limited to expensive but accurate isokinetic dynamometry (IKD) or inexpensive but less accurate hand-held dynamometers (HHD). A wearable, self-stabilizing, limb strength measurement device (LSMD) was developed to fill the current gap in portable strength measurement devices. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the LSMD in healthy adults. Twenty healthy adults were recruited to attend two strength testing sessions where elbow flexor and extensor strength was measured with the LSMD, with HHD and with IKD in random order, by two raters. Outcomes were intra-rater repeatability, inter-rater reproducibility and inter-session reproducibility using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Limits of agreement and weighted least products regression were used to test the validity of the LSMD relative to the criterion standard (IKD), and calibration formulas derived to improve measurement fidelity. ICC values for the LSMD were >0.90 for all measures of reliability and for both muscle groups, but over-predicted extensor strength and under-predicted flexor strength. Validity was established by transforming the data with the criterion standard-based calibration. These data indicate that the LSMD is reliable and conditionally valid for quantifying strength of elbow flexors and extensors in a healthy adult population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7349842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73498422020-07-15 Reliability and Validity of a Novel Wearable Device for Measuring Elbow Strength Brookshaw, Marcus Sexton, Andrew McGibbon, Chris A. Sensors (Basel) Article Muscle strength is an important clinical outcome in rehabilitation and sport medicine, but options are limited to expensive but accurate isokinetic dynamometry (IKD) or inexpensive but less accurate hand-held dynamometers (HHD). A wearable, self-stabilizing, limb strength measurement device (LSMD) was developed to fill the current gap in portable strength measurement devices. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the LSMD in healthy adults. Twenty healthy adults were recruited to attend two strength testing sessions where elbow flexor and extensor strength was measured with the LSMD, with HHD and with IKD in random order, by two raters. Outcomes were intra-rater repeatability, inter-rater reproducibility and inter-session reproducibility using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Limits of agreement and weighted least products regression were used to test the validity of the LSMD relative to the criterion standard (IKD), and calibration formulas derived to improve measurement fidelity. ICC values for the LSMD were >0.90 for all measures of reliability and for both muscle groups, but over-predicted extensor strength and under-predicted flexor strength. Validity was established by transforming the data with the criterion standard-based calibration. These data indicate that the LSMD is reliable and conditionally valid for quantifying strength of elbow flexors and extensors in a healthy adult population. MDPI 2020-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7349842/ /pubmed/32560409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20123412 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Brookshaw, Marcus
Sexton, Andrew
McGibbon, Chris A.
Reliability and Validity of a Novel Wearable Device for Measuring Elbow Strength
title Reliability and Validity of a Novel Wearable Device for Measuring Elbow Strength
title_full Reliability and Validity of a Novel Wearable Device for Measuring Elbow Strength
title_fullStr Reliability and Validity of a Novel Wearable Device for Measuring Elbow Strength
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and Validity of a Novel Wearable Device for Measuring Elbow Strength
title_short Reliability and Validity of a Novel Wearable Device for Measuring Elbow Strength
title_sort reliability and validity of a novel wearable device for measuring elbow strength
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7349842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32560409
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20123412
work_keys_str_mv AT brookshawmarcus reliabilityandvalidityofanovelwearabledeviceformeasuringelbowstrength
AT sextonandrew reliabilityandvalidityofanovelwearabledeviceformeasuringelbowstrength
AT mcgibbonchrisa reliabilityandvalidityofanovelwearabledeviceformeasuringelbowstrength