Cargando…
Follow-Up in Bone Sarcoma Care: A Cross-Sectional European Study
BACKGROUND: Follow-up of high-grade bone sarcoma patients with repeated radiological imaging aims at early detection of recurrent disease or distant metastasis. Repeated radiological imaging does expose (mostly young) patients to ionising radiation. At this point, it is not known whether frequent fo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7350160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32675939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2040347 |
_version_ | 1783557208970100736 |
---|---|
author | Goedhart, Louren M. Leithner, Andreas Ploegmakers, Joris J. W. Jutte, Paul C. |
author_facet | Goedhart, Louren M. Leithner, Andreas Ploegmakers, Joris J. W. Jutte, Paul C. |
author_sort | Goedhart, Louren M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Follow-up of high-grade bone sarcoma patients with repeated radiological imaging aims at early detection of recurrent disease or distant metastasis. Repeated radiological imaging does expose (mostly young) patients to ionising radiation. At this point, it is not known whether frequent follow-up increases overall survival. Additionally, frequent follow-up subjects patients and families to psychological stress. This study aims to assess follow-up procedures in terms of frequency and type of imaging modalities in bone tumour centres across Europe for comparison and improvement of knowledge as a first step towards a more uniform approach towards bone sarcoma follow-up. METHODS: Data were obtained through analysis of several follow-up protocols and a digital questionnaire returned by EMSOS members of bone tumour centres all across Europe. RESULTS: All participating bone tumour centres attained a minimum follow-up period of ten years. National guidelines revealed variations in follow-up intervals and use of repeated imaging with ionising radiation. A local and a chest X-ray were obtained at 47.6% of the responding clinics at every follow-up patient visit. CONCLUSIONS: Variations were seen among European bone sarcoma centres with regards to follow-up intervals and use of repeated imaging. The majority of these expert centres follow existing international guidelines and find them sufficient as basis for a follow-up surveillance programme despite lack of evidence. Future research should aim towards evidence-based follow-up with focus on the effects of follow-up strategies on health outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and individualised follow-up algorithms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7350160 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73501602020-07-15 Follow-Up in Bone Sarcoma Care: A Cross-Sectional European Study Goedhart, Louren M. Leithner, Andreas Ploegmakers, Joris J. W. Jutte, Paul C. Sarcoma Research Article BACKGROUND: Follow-up of high-grade bone sarcoma patients with repeated radiological imaging aims at early detection of recurrent disease or distant metastasis. Repeated radiological imaging does expose (mostly young) patients to ionising radiation. At this point, it is not known whether frequent follow-up increases overall survival. Additionally, frequent follow-up subjects patients and families to psychological stress. This study aims to assess follow-up procedures in terms of frequency and type of imaging modalities in bone tumour centres across Europe for comparison and improvement of knowledge as a first step towards a more uniform approach towards bone sarcoma follow-up. METHODS: Data were obtained through analysis of several follow-up protocols and a digital questionnaire returned by EMSOS members of bone tumour centres all across Europe. RESULTS: All participating bone tumour centres attained a minimum follow-up period of ten years. National guidelines revealed variations in follow-up intervals and use of repeated imaging with ionising radiation. A local and a chest X-ray were obtained at 47.6% of the responding clinics at every follow-up patient visit. CONCLUSIONS: Variations were seen among European bone sarcoma centres with regards to follow-up intervals and use of repeated imaging. The majority of these expert centres follow existing international guidelines and find them sufficient as basis for a follow-up surveillance programme despite lack of evidence. Future research should aim towards evidence-based follow-up with focus on the effects of follow-up strategies on health outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and individualised follow-up algorithms. Hindawi 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7350160/ /pubmed/32675939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2040347 Text en Copyright © 2020 Louren M. Goedhart et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Goedhart, Louren M. Leithner, Andreas Ploegmakers, Joris J. W. Jutte, Paul C. Follow-Up in Bone Sarcoma Care: A Cross-Sectional European Study |
title | Follow-Up in Bone Sarcoma Care: A Cross-Sectional European Study |
title_full | Follow-Up in Bone Sarcoma Care: A Cross-Sectional European Study |
title_fullStr | Follow-Up in Bone Sarcoma Care: A Cross-Sectional European Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Follow-Up in Bone Sarcoma Care: A Cross-Sectional European Study |
title_short | Follow-Up in Bone Sarcoma Care: A Cross-Sectional European Study |
title_sort | follow-up in bone sarcoma care: a cross-sectional european study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7350160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32675939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2040347 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goedhartlourenm followupinbonesarcomacareacrosssectionaleuropeanstudy AT leithnerandreas followupinbonesarcomacareacrosssectionaleuropeanstudy AT ploegmakersjorisjw followupinbonesarcomacareacrosssectionaleuropeanstudy AT juttepaulc followupinbonesarcomacareacrosssectionaleuropeanstudy |