Cargando…

Follow-Up in Bone Sarcoma Care: A Cross-Sectional European Study

BACKGROUND: Follow-up of high-grade bone sarcoma patients with repeated radiological imaging aims at early detection of recurrent disease or distant metastasis. Repeated radiological imaging does expose (mostly young) patients to ionising radiation. At this point, it is not known whether frequent fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goedhart, Louren M., Leithner, Andreas, Ploegmakers, Joris J. W., Jutte, Paul C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7350160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32675939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2040347
_version_ 1783557208970100736
author Goedhart, Louren M.
Leithner, Andreas
Ploegmakers, Joris J. W.
Jutte, Paul C.
author_facet Goedhart, Louren M.
Leithner, Andreas
Ploegmakers, Joris J. W.
Jutte, Paul C.
author_sort Goedhart, Louren M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Follow-up of high-grade bone sarcoma patients with repeated radiological imaging aims at early detection of recurrent disease or distant metastasis. Repeated radiological imaging does expose (mostly young) patients to ionising radiation. At this point, it is not known whether frequent follow-up increases overall survival. Additionally, frequent follow-up subjects patients and families to psychological stress. This study aims to assess follow-up procedures in terms of frequency and type of imaging modalities in bone tumour centres across Europe for comparison and improvement of knowledge as a first step towards a more uniform approach towards bone sarcoma follow-up. METHODS: Data were obtained through analysis of several follow-up protocols and a digital questionnaire returned by EMSOS members of bone tumour centres all across Europe. RESULTS: All participating bone tumour centres attained a minimum follow-up period of ten years. National guidelines revealed variations in follow-up intervals and use of repeated imaging with ionising radiation. A local and a chest X-ray were obtained at 47.6% of the responding clinics at every follow-up patient visit. CONCLUSIONS: Variations were seen among European bone sarcoma centres with regards to follow-up intervals and use of repeated imaging. The majority of these expert centres follow existing international guidelines and find them sufficient as basis for a follow-up surveillance programme despite lack of evidence. Future research should aim towards evidence-based follow-up with focus on the effects of follow-up strategies on health outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and individualised follow-up algorithms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7350160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73501602020-07-15 Follow-Up in Bone Sarcoma Care: A Cross-Sectional European Study Goedhart, Louren M. Leithner, Andreas Ploegmakers, Joris J. W. Jutte, Paul C. Sarcoma Research Article BACKGROUND: Follow-up of high-grade bone sarcoma patients with repeated radiological imaging aims at early detection of recurrent disease or distant metastasis. Repeated radiological imaging does expose (mostly young) patients to ionising radiation. At this point, it is not known whether frequent follow-up increases overall survival. Additionally, frequent follow-up subjects patients and families to psychological stress. This study aims to assess follow-up procedures in terms of frequency and type of imaging modalities in bone tumour centres across Europe for comparison and improvement of knowledge as a first step towards a more uniform approach towards bone sarcoma follow-up. METHODS: Data were obtained through analysis of several follow-up protocols and a digital questionnaire returned by EMSOS members of bone tumour centres all across Europe. RESULTS: All participating bone tumour centres attained a minimum follow-up period of ten years. National guidelines revealed variations in follow-up intervals and use of repeated imaging with ionising radiation. A local and a chest X-ray were obtained at 47.6% of the responding clinics at every follow-up patient visit. CONCLUSIONS: Variations were seen among European bone sarcoma centres with regards to follow-up intervals and use of repeated imaging. The majority of these expert centres follow existing international guidelines and find them sufficient as basis for a follow-up surveillance programme despite lack of evidence. Future research should aim towards evidence-based follow-up with focus on the effects of follow-up strategies on health outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and individualised follow-up algorithms. Hindawi 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7350160/ /pubmed/32675939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2040347 Text en Copyright © 2020 Louren M. Goedhart et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Goedhart, Louren M.
Leithner, Andreas
Ploegmakers, Joris J. W.
Jutte, Paul C.
Follow-Up in Bone Sarcoma Care: A Cross-Sectional European Study
title Follow-Up in Bone Sarcoma Care: A Cross-Sectional European Study
title_full Follow-Up in Bone Sarcoma Care: A Cross-Sectional European Study
title_fullStr Follow-Up in Bone Sarcoma Care: A Cross-Sectional European Study
title_full_unstemmed Follow-Up in Bone Sarcoma Care: A Cross-Sectional European Study
title_short Follow-Up in Bone Sarcoma Care: A Cross-Sectional European Study
title_sort follow-up in bone sarcoma care: a cross-sectional european study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7350160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32675939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2040347
work_keys_str_mv AT goedhartlourenm followupinbonesarcomacareacrosssectionaleuropeanstudy
AT leithnerandreas followupinbonesarcomacareacrosssectionaleuropeanstudy
AT ploegmakersjorisjw followupinbonesarcomacareacrosssectionaleuropeanstudy
AT juttepaulc followupinbonesarcomacareacrosssectionaleuropeanstudy