Cargando…

Traditional Self-Reported Dietary Instruments Are Prone to Inaccuracies and New Approaches Are Needed

Background: Diet is a modifiable behavior that influences an individual's health. Because of this, diet assessment is an important component of public health surveillance, evaluating response to community health interventions, and monitoring individual compliance to medical interventions. Diet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ravelli, Michele N., Schoeller, Dale A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7350526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32719809
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.00090
_version_ 1783557286571016192
author Ravelli, Michele N.
Schoeller, Dale A.
author_facet Ravelli, Michele N.
Schoeller, Dale A.
author_sort Ravelli, Michele N.
collection PubMed
description Background: Diet is a modifiable behavior that influences an individual's health. Because of this, diet assessment is an important component of public health surveillance, evaluating response to community health interventions, and monitoring individual compliance to medical interventions. Diet assessments are usually performed using one of three basic methods: diet recall, diet diaries, or food frequency questionnaires. Although these three assessment instruments have displayed a strong agreement between themselves, when reported intake is compared with intake measured using quantitative nutrient biomarkers, investigators have identified systematic misreporting errors for all three of these self-reported dietary instruments. Aims: This work aims to summarize the state of knowledge regarding misreporting and why it impedes diet–health research and to introduce advances in the collection and the treatment of dietary data. Methods: This work reviews and summarizes published data on misreporting and the recent efforts to reduce such errors. Results: The evidence demonstrates a strong and consistent systematic underreporting of energy intake (EIn) across adults and children studies. Underreporting of EIn has been found to increase with body mass index (BMI), and the differences between macronutrient reports indicate that not all foods are underreported equally. Protein is least underreported, but which specific foods are commonly underreported are not known. Conclusions: Because energy underreporting varies as a function of BMI, self-reported EIn should not be used for the study of energy balance in the study of obesity. The between-individual variability in the underreporting of self-reported intake of energy and other nutrients attenuates diet–disease relationships. Recent efforts to correct for underreporting have reduced misreporting of diet outcomes, but improvements have been incremental in nature and more research is needed to validate and extend these efforts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7350526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73505262020-07-26 Traditional Self-Reported Dietary Instruments Are Prone to Inaccuracies and New Approaches Are Needed Ravelli, Michele N. Schoeller, Dale A. Front Nutr Nutrition Background: Diet is a modifiable behavior that influences an individual's health. Because of this, diet assessment is an important component of public health surveillance, evaluating response to community health interventions, and monitoring individual compliance to medical interventions. Diet assessments are usually performed using one of three basic methods: diet recall, diet diaries, or food frequency questionnaires. Although these three assessment instruments have displayed a strong agreement between themselves, when reported intake is compared with intake measured using quantitative nutrient biomarkers, investigators have identified systematic misreporting errors for all three of these self-reported dietary instruments. Aims: This work aims to summarize the state of knowledge regarding misreporting and why it impedes diet–health research and to introduce advances in the collection and the treatment of dietary data. Methods: This work reviews and summarizes published data on misreporting and the recent efforts to reduce such errors. Results: The evidence demonstrates a strong and consistent systematic underreporting of energy intake (EIn) across adults and children studies. Underreporting of EIn has been found to increase with body mass index (BMI), and the differences between macronutrient reports indicate that not all foods are underreported equally. Protein is least underreported, but which specific foods are commonly underreported are not known. Conclusions: Because energy underreporting varies as a function of BMI, self-reported EIn should not be used for the study of energy balance in the study of obesity. The between-individual variability in the underreporting of self-reported intake of energy and other nutrients attenuates diet–disease relationships. Recent efforts to correct for underreporting have reduced misreporting of diet outcomes, but improvements have been incremental in nature and more research is needed to validate and extend these efforts. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7350526/ /pubmed/32719809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.00090 Text en Copyright © 2020 Ravelli and Schoeller. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Ravelli, Michele N.
Schoeller, Dale A.
Traditional Self-Reported Dietary Instruments Are Prone to Inaccuracies and New Approaches Are Needed
title Traditional Self-Reported Dietary Instruments Are Prone to Inaccuracies and New Approaches Are Needed
title_full Traditional Self-Reported Dietary Instruments Are Prone to Inaccuracies and New Approaches Are Needed
title_fullStr Traditional Self-Reported Dietary Instruments Are Prone to Inaccuracies and New Approaches Are Needed
title_full_unstemmed Traditional Self-Reported Dietary Instruments Are Prone to Inaccuracies and New Approaches Are Needed
title_short Traditional Self-Reported Dietary Instruments Are Prone to Inaccuracies and New Approaches Are Needed
title_sort traditional self-reported dietary instruments are prone to inaccuracies and new approaches are needed
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7350526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32719809
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.00090
work_keys_str_mv AT ravellimichelen traditionalselfreporteddietaryinstrumentsarepronetoinaccuraciesandnewapproachesareneeded
AT schoellerdalea traditionalselfreporteddietaryinstrumentsarepronetoinaccuraciesandnewapproachesareneeded