Cargando…
‘We all have the same right to have health services’: a case study of Namati’s legal empowerment program in Mozambique
BACKGROUND: Legal empowerment and social accountability are two strategies that are increasingly used to address gaps in healthcare in low- and middle-income countries, including failure to provide services that should be available and poor clinical and interpersonal quality of care. This paper is a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7350694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32650772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09190-7 |
_version_ | 1783557317254447104 |
---|---|
author | Schaaf, Marta Falcao, Joana Feinglass, Ellie Kitchell, Erin Gomes, Nadja Freedman, Lynn |
author_facet | Schaaf, Marta Falcao, Joana Feinglass, Ellie Kitchell, Erin Gomes, Nadja Freedman, Lynn |
author_sort | Schaaf, Marta |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Legal empowerment and social accountability are two strategies that are increasingly used to address gaps in healthcare in low- and middle-income countries, including failure to provide services that should be available and poor clinical and interpersonal quality of care. This paper is an explanatory case study of a legal empowerment effort that employs community paralegals and trains Village Health Committees (VHCs) in Mozambique. The research objective was to explore how community paralegals solved cases, the impact paralegals had on health services, and how their work affected the relationship between the community and the health sector at the local level. METHODS: The case study had two components: (1) a retrospective review of 24 cases of patient/community grievances about the health system, and (2) qualitative investigation of the program and program context. The case reviews were accomplished by conducting structured in-depth interviews (IDIs) with those directly involved in the case. The qualitative investigation entailed semi-structured Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with district, provincial, and national health managers and Namati staff. In addition, focus group discussions (FGDs) were held with Health Advocates and VHC members. RESULTS: Case resolution conferred a sense of empowerment to clients, brought immediate, concrete improvements in health service quality at the health facilities concerned, and seemingly instigated a virtuous circle of rights-claiming. The program also engendered incipient improvements in relations between clients and the health system. We identified three key mechanisms underlying case resolution, including: bolstered administrative capacity within the health sector, reduced transaction and political costs for health providers, and provider fear of administrative sanction. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the limited literature regarding the mechanisms of legal empowerment case resolution in health systems and the impact of hybrid legal empowerment and social accountability approaches. Future research might assess the sustainability of case resolution; how governance at central, provincial, and district level is affected by similar programs; and to what extent the mix of different cases addressed by legal empowerment influences the success of the program. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7350694 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73506942020-07-14 ‘We all have the same right to have health services’: a case study of Namati’s legal empowerment program in Mozambique Schaaf, Marta Falcao, Joana Feinglass, Ellie Kitchell, Erin Gomes, Nadja Freedman, Lynn BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Legal empowerment and social accountability are two strategies that are increasingly used to address gaps in healthcare in low- and middle-income countries, including failure to provide services that should be available and poor clinical and interpersonal quality of care. This paper is an explanatory case study of a legal empowerment effort that employs community paralegals and trains Village Health Committees (VHCs) in Mozambique. The research objective was to explore how community paralegals solved cases, the impact paralegals had on health services, and how their work affected the relationship between the community and the health sector at the local level. METHODS: The case study had two components: (1) a retrospective review of 24 cases of patient/community grievances about the health system, and (2) qualitative investigation of the program and program context. The case reviews were accomplished by conducting structured in-depth interviews (IDIs) with those directly involved in the case. The qualitative investigation entailed semi-structured Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with district, provincial, and national health managers and Namati staff. In addition, focus group discussions (FGDs) were held with Health Advocates and VHC members. RESULTS: Case resolution conferred a sense of empowerment to clients, brought immediate, concrete improvements in health service quality at the health facilities concerned, and seemingly instigated a virtuous circle of rights-claiming. The program also engendered incipient improvements in relations between clients and the health system. We identified three key mechanisms underlying case resolution, including: bolstered administrative capacity within the health sector, reduced transaction and political costs for health providers, and provider fear of administrative sanction. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the limited literature regarding the mechanisms of legal empowerment case resolution in health systems and the impact of hybrid legal empowerment and social accountability approaches. Future research might assess the sustainability of case resolution; how governance at central, provincial, and district level is affected by similar programs; and to what extent the mix of different cases addressed by legal empowerment influences the success of the program. BioMed Central 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7350694/ /pubmed/32650772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09190-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schaaf, Marta Falcao, Joana Feinglass, Ellie Kitchell, Erin Gomes, Nadja Freedman, Lynn ‘We all have the same right to have health services’: a case study of Namati’s legal empowerment program in Mozambique |
title | ‘We all have the same right to have health services’: a case study of Namati’s legal empowerment program in Mozambique |
title_full | ‘We all have the same right to have health services’: a case study of Namati’s legal empowerment program in Mozambique |
title_fullStr | ‘We all have the same right to have health services’: a case study of Namati’s legal empowerment program in Mozambique |
title_full_unstemmed | ‘We all have the same right to have health services’: a case study of Namati’s legal empowerment program in Mozambique |
title_short | ‘We all have the same right to have health services’: a case study of Namati’s legal empowerment program in Mozambique |
title_sort | ‘we all have the same right to have health services’: a case study of namati’s legal empowerment program in mozambique |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7350694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32650772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09190-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schaafmarta weallhavethesamerighttohavehealthservicesacasestudyofnamatislegalempowermentprograminmozambique AT falcaojoana weallhavethesamerighttohavehealthservicesacasestudyofnamatislegalempowermentprograminmozambique AT feinglassellie weallhavethesamerighttohavehealthservicesacasestudyofnamatislegalempowermentprograminmozambique AT kitchellerin weallhavethesamerighttohavehealthservicesacasestudyofnamatislegalempowermentprograminmozambique AT gomesnadja weallhavethesamerighttohavehealthservicesacasestudyofnamatislegalempowermentprograminmozambique AT freedmanlynn weallhavethesamerighttohavehealthservicesacasestudyofnamatislegalempowermentprograminmozambique |