Cargando…

Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) for the detection of Plasmodium knowlesi and Plasmodium vivax

BACKGROUND: Plasmodium knowlesi and Plasmodium vivax are the predominant Plasmodium species that cause malaria in Malaysia and play a role in asymptomatic malaria disease transmission in Malaysia. The diagnostic tools available to diagnose malaria, such as microscopy and rapid diagnostic test (RDT),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahendran, Punitha, Liew, Jonathan Wee Kent, Amir, Amirah, Ching, Xiao-Teng, Lau, Yee-Ling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7350699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32650774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03314-5
_version_ 1783557318215991296
author Mahendran, Punitha
Liew, Jonathan Wee Kent
Amir, Amirah
Ching, Xiao-Teng
Lau, Yee-Ling
author_facet Mahendran, Punitha
Liew, Jonathan Wee Kent
Amir, Amirah
Ching, Xiao-Teng
Lau, Yee-Ling
author_sort Mahendran, Punitha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Plasmodium knowlesi and Plasmodium vivax are the predominant Plasmodium species that cause malaria in Malaysia and play a role in asymptomatic malaria disease transmission in Malaysia. The diagnostic tools available to diagnose malaria, such as microscopy and rapid diagnostic test (RDT), are less sensitive at detecting lower parasite density. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), which has been shown to have higher sensitivity at diagnosing malaria, allows direct quantification without the need for a standard curve. The aim of this study is to develop and use a duplex ddPCR assay for the detection of P. knowlesi and P. vivax, and compare this method to nested PCR and qPCR. METHODS: The concordance rate, sensitivity and specificity of the duplex ddPCR assay were determined and compared to nested PCR and duplex qPCR. RESULTS: The duplex ddPCR assay had higher analytical sensitivity (P. vivax = 10 copies/µL and P. knowlesi = 0.01 copies/µL) compared to qPCR (P. vivax = 100 copies/µL and P. knowlesi = 10 copies/µL). Moreover, the ddPCR assay had acceptable clinical sensitivity (P. vivax = 80% and P. knowlesi = 90%) and clinical specificity (P. vivax = 87.84% and P. knowlesi = 81.08%) when compared to nested PCR. Both ddPCR and qPCR detected more double infections in the samples. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the ddPCR assay demonstrated acceptable efficiency in detection of P. knowlesi and P. vivax, and was more sensitive than nested PCR in detecting mixed infections. However, the duplex ddPCR assay still needs optimization to improve the assay’s clinical sensitivity and specificity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7350699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73506992020-07-14 Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) for the detection of Plasmodium knowlesi and Plasmodium vivax Mahendran, Punitha Liew, Jonathan Wee Kent Amir, Amirah Ching, Xiao-Teng Lau, Yee-Ling Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Plasmodium knowlesi and Plasmodium vivax are the predominant Plasmodium species that cause malaria in Malaysia and play a role in asymptomatic malaria disease transmission in Malaysia. The diagnostic tools available to diagnose malaria, such as microscopy and rapid diagnostic test (RDT), are less sensitive at detecting lower parasite density. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), which has been shown to have higher sensitivity at diagnosing malaria, allows direct quantification without the need for a standard curve. The aim of this study is to develop and use a duplex ddPCR assay for the detection of P. knowlesi and P. vivax, and compare this method to nested PCR and qPCR. METHODS: The concordance rate, sensitivity and specificity of the duplex ddPCR assay were determined and compared to nested PCR and duplex qPCR. RESULTS: The duplex ddPCR assay had higher analytical sensitivity (P. vivax = 10 copies/µL and P. knowlesi = 0.01 copies/µL) compared to qPCR (P. vivax = 100 copies/µL and P. knowlesi = 10 copies/µL). Moreover, the ddPCR assay had acceptable clinical sensitivity (P. vivax = 80% and P. knowlesi = 90%) and clinical specificity (P. vivax = 87.84% and P. knowlesi = 81.08%) when compared to nested PCR. Both ddPCR and qPCR detected more double infections in the samples. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the ddPCR assay demonstrated acceptable efficiency in detection of P. knowlesi and P. vivax, and was more sensitive than nested PCR in detecting mixed infections. However, the duplex ddPCR assay still needs optimization to improve the assay’s clinical sensitivity and specificity. BioMed Central 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7350699/ /pubmed/32650774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03314-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020, Corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mahendran, Punitha
Liew, Jonathan Wee Kent
Amir, Amirah
Ching, Xiao-Teng
Lau, Yee-Ling
Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) for the detection of Plasmodium knowlesi and Plasmodium vivax
title Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) for the detection of Plasmodium knowlesi and Plasmodium vivax
title_full Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) for the detection of Plasmodium knowlesi and Plasmodium vivax
title_fullStr Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) for the detection of Plasmodium knowlesi and Plasmodium vivax
title_full_unstemmed Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) for the detection of Plasmodium knowlesi and Plasmodium vivax
title_short Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) for the detection of Plasmodium knowlesi and Plasmodium vivax
title_sort droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddpcr) for the detection of plasmodium knowlesi and plasmodium vivax
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7350699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32650774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03314-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mahendranpunitha dropletdigitalpolymerasechainreactionddpcrforthedetectionofplasmodiumknowlesiandplasmodiumvivax
AT liewjonathanweekent dropletdigitalpolymerasechainreactionddpcrforthedetectionofplasmodiumknowlesiandplasmodiumvivax
AT amiramirah dropletdigitalpolymerasechainreactionddpcrforthedetectionofplasmodiumknowlesiandplasmodiumvivax
AT chingxiaoteng dropletdigitalpolymerasechainreactionddpcrforthedetectionofplasmodiumknowlesiandplasmodiumvivax
AT lauyeeling dropletdigitalpolymerasechainreactionddpcrforthedetectionofplasmodiumknowlesiandplasmodiumvivax