Cargando…

Evaluation of the efficacy of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis in failed back surgery syndrome

BACKGROUND/AIM: We aimed to compare the results of the treatment of the patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) by mechanical lysis and steroid hylase injection via epiduroscopy due to their stabilization status and to detect the effect of pathological diagnostic markers on prognosis and o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: CEYLAN, Ayşegül, AŞIK, İbrahim, ÖZGENCİL, Güngör Enver, ERKEN, Burak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7350827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761878
http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1807-173
_version_ 1783557341746036736
author CEYLAN, Ayşegül
AŞIK, İbrahim
ÖZGENCİL, Güngör Enver
ERKEN, Burak
author_facet CEYLAN, Ayşegül
AŞIK, İbrahim
ÖZGENCİL, Güngör Enver
ERKEN, Burak
author_sort CEYLAN, Ayşegül
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIM: We aimed to compare the results of the treatment of the patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) by mechanical lysis and steroid hylase injection via epiduroscopy due to their stabilization status and to detect the effect of pathological diagnostic markers on prognosis and ongoing treatment protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-two patients with FBSS symptoms were included. Two groups were composed as group I (stabilized) and group II (nonstabilized). All patients were evaluated using the oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores before and after treatment at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and using the patient satisfaction scale at 12 months following treatment. Epidural scar tissue visual and mechanical signs were also recorded. RESULTS: Mean VAS scores were 7.8 and 3.28 points in group I (P < 0.001) and 7.51 and 2.74 points in group II (P < 0.001) at the beginning and at 12 months, respectively. Mean ODI scores were 34.05 and 22.16 points in group I (P < 0.001) and 30.74 and 19.46 points in group II (P < 0.001) at the beginning and at 12 months. VAS and ODI scores decreased significantly in both groups, but were more significant in the nonstabilized group (P < 0.001). Moderate or severe fibrous tissue was observed in 86.58% of the patients and patient satisfaction scores were very good or good in 78.06% of the patients. During the procedure, a dura rupture developed in four patients in the stabilization group and in two patients in the nonstabilization group; however, none of these patients developed a spinal headache and no significant permanent complication arose. CONCLUSION: We suggest that epidural adhesiolysis, hyaluronidase, and steroid injection in patients with FBSS chronic low back pain and/or radicular symptoms may give reliable information about the quality of life, accuracy of diagnosis, and the possible course of the present findings and may be more effective in nonstabilized patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7350827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73508272020-07-13 Evaluation of the efficacy of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis in failed back surgery syndrome CEYLAN, Ayşegül AŞIK, İbrahim ÖZGENCİL, Güngör Enver ERKEN, Burak Turk J Med Sci Article BACKGROUND/AIM: We aimed to compare the results of the treatment of the patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) by mechanical lysis and steroid hylase injection via epiduroscopy due to their stabilization status and to detect the effect of pathological diagnostic markers on prognosis and ongoing treatment protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-two patients with FBSS symptoms were included. Two groups were composed as group I (stabilized) and group II (nonstabilized). All patients were evaluated using the oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores before and after treatment at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and using the patient satisfaction scale at 12 months following treatment. Epidural scar tissue visual and mechanical signs were also recorded. RESULTS: Mean VAS scores were 7.8 and 3.28 points in group I (P < 0.001) and 7.51 and 2.74 points in group II (P < 0.001) at the beginning and at 12 months, respectively. Mean ODI scores were 34.05 and 22.16 points in group I (P < 0.001) and 30.74 and 19.46 points in group II (P < 0.001) at the beginning and at 12 months. VAS and ODI scores decreased significantly in both groups, but were more significant in the nonstabilized group (P < 0.001). Moderate or severe fibrous tissue was observed in 86.58% of the patients and patient satisfaction scores were very good or good in 78.06% of the patients. During the procedure, a dura rupture developed in four patients in the stabilization group and in two patients in the nonstabilization group; however, none of these patients developed a spinal headache and no significant permanent complication arose. CONCLUSION: We suggest that epidural adhesiolysis, hyaluronidase, and steroid injection in patients with FBSS chronic low back pain and/or radicular symptoms may give reliable information about the quality of life, accuracy of diagnosis, and the possible course of the present findings and may be more effective in nonstabilized patients. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2019-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7350827/ /pubmed/30761878 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1807-173 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
CEYLAN, Ayşegül
AŞIK, İbrahim
ÖZGENCİL, Güngör Enver
ERKEN, Burak
Evaluation of the efficacy of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis in failed back surgery syndrome
title Evaluation of the efficacy of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis in failed back surgery syndrome
title_full Evaluation of the efficacy of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis in failed back surgery syndrome
title_fullStr Evaluation of the efficacy of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis in failed back surgery syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the efficacy of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis in failed back surgery syndrome
title_short Evaluation of the efficacy of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis in failed back surgery syndrome
title_sort evaluation of the efficacy of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis in failed back surgery syndrome
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7350827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761878
http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1807-173
work_keys_str_mv AT ceylanaysegul evaluationoftheefficacyofepiduroscopicadhesiolysisinfailedbacksurgerysyndrome
AT asikibrahim evaluationoftheefficacyofepiduroscopicadhesiolysisinfailedbacksurgerysyndrome
AT ozgencilgungorenver evaluationoftheefficacyofepiduroscopicadhesiolysisinfailedbacksurgerysyndrome
AT erkenburak evaluationoftheefficacyofepiduroscopicadhesiolysisinfailedbacksurgerysyndrome