Cargando…
Reliability and validity of an equanimity questionnaire: the two-factor equanimity scale (EQUA-S)
BACKGROUND: Many studies have revealed the positive impact of mindfulness training on mental health and proposed equanimity as a general outcome in contemplative research. Despite recent interest, relatively few studies have empirically examined equanimity and measurement instruments are still lacki...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7350915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704443 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9405 |
_version_ | 1783557360823828480 |
---|---|
author | Juneau, Catherine Pellerin, Nicolas Trives, Elliott Ricard, Matthieu Shankland, Rébecca Dambrun, Michael |
author_facet | Juneau, Catherine Pellerin, Nicolas Trives, Elliott Ricard, Matthieu Shankland, Rébecca Dambrun, Michael |
author_sort | Juneau, Catherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many studies have revealed the positive impact of mindfulness training on mental health and proposed equanimity as a general outcome in contemplative research. Despite recent interest, relatively few studies have empirically examined equanimity and measurement instruments are still lacking. The main goal of this study was to develop an Equanimity Scale (the EQUA-S) in a Western population with or without meditation experience, based on previous definitions of equanimity, in order to investigate its relations with the relevant psychological constructs and health outcomes. METHODS: Adults from the general population (N = 265; M(age) = 34.81) completed various measures: the EQUA-S, mindfulness, hyper-sensitivity, avoidance and fusion, impulsivity, personality, alexithymia, sensitivity to punishment and reward and frequency of problematic addictive behaviors. The dimensionality of the EQUA-S was examined using Factor Analyses. The convergent validity of this new scale was investigated using Pearson’s Correlations. RESULTS: The results of a factor analysis revealed two dimensions of equanimity: an even-minded state of mind (E-MSM) and a hedonic independence (HI) component. While the E-MSM was positively related to emotional stability, adaptive emotional regulation and several mindfulness-related abilities, HI was found to correlate negatively with addictive issues. DISCUSSION: The relations with personality constructs and possible related cognitive processes are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7350915 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73509152020-07-22 Reliability and validity of an equanimity questionnaire: the two-factor equanimity scale (EQUA-S) Juneau, Catherine Pellerin, Nicolas Trives, Elliott Ricard, Matthieu Shankland, Rébecca Dambrun, Michael PeerJ Psychiatry and Psychology BACKGROUND: Many studies have revealed the positive impact of mindfulness training on mental health and proposed equanimity as a general outcome in contemplative research. Despite recent interest, relatively few studies have empirically examined equanimity and measurement instruments are still lacking. The main goal of this study was to develop an Equanimity Scale (the EQUA-S) in a Western population with or without meditation experience, based on previous definitions of equanimity, in order to investigate its relations with the relevant psychological constructs and health outcomes. METHODS: Adults from the general population (N = 265; M(age) = 34.81) completed various measures: the EQUA-S, mindfulness, hyper-sensitivity, avoidance and fusion, impulsivity, personality, alexithymia, sensitivity to punishment and reward and frequency of problematic addictive behaviors. The dimensionality of the EQUA-S was examined using Factor Analyses. The convergent validity of this new scale was investigated using Pearson’s Correlations. RESULTS: The results of a factor analysis revealed two dimensions of equanimity: an even-minded state of mind (E-MSM) and a hedonic independence (HI) component. While the E-MSM was positively related to emotional stability, adaptive emotional regulation and several mindfulness-related abilities, HI was found to correlate negatively with addictive issues. DISCUSSION: The relations with personality constructs and possible related cognitive processes are discussed. PeerJ Inc. 2020-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7350915/ /pubmed/32704443 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9405 Text en © 2020 Juneau et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry and Psychology Juneau, Catherine Pellerin, Nicolas Trives, Elliott Ricard, Matthieu Shankland, Rébecca Dambrun, Michael Reliability and validity of an equanimity questionnaire: the two-factor equanimity scale (EQUA-S) |
title | Reliability and validity of an equanimity questionnaire: the two-factor equanimity scale (EQUA-S) |
title_full | Reliability and validity of an equanimity questionnaire: the two-factor equanimity scale (EQUA-S) |
title_fullStr | Reliability and validity of an equanimity questionnaire: the two-factor equanimity scale (EQUA-S) |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and validity of an equanimity questionnaire: the two-factor equanimity scale (EQUA-S) |
title_short | Reliability and validity of an equanimity questionnaire: the two-factor equanimity scale (EQUA-S) |
title_sort | reliability and validity of an equanimity questionnaire: the two-factor equanimity scale (equa-s) |
topic | Psychiatry and Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7350915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704443 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9405 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT juneaucatherine reliabilityandvalidityofanequanimityquestionnairethetwofactorequanimityscaleequas AT pellerinnicolas reliabilityandvalidityofanequanimityquestionnairethetwofactorequanimityscaleequas AT triveselliott reliabilityandvalidityofanequanimityquestionnairethetwofactorequanimityscaleequas AT ricardmatthieu reliabilityandvalidityofanequanimityquestionnairethetwofactorequanimityscaleequas AT shanklandrebecca reliabilityandvalidityofanequanimityquestionnairethetwofactorequanimityscaleequas AT dambrunmichael reliabilityandvalidityofanequanimityquestionnairethetwofactorequanimityscaleequas |