Cargando…
Diagnostic criteria for left ventricular non-compaction in cardiac computed tomography
PURPOSE: Left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) is characterized by a 2-layered myocardium composed of a noncompacted (NC) and a compacted (C) layer. The echocardiographic NC:C ratio is difficult to assess in many patients. The aim of the study was to assess the value of cardiac computed tomography...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7351212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32649698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235751 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: Left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) is characterized by a 2-layered myocardium composed of a noncompacted (NC) and a compacted (C) layer. The echocardiographic NC:C ratio is difficult to assess in many patients. The aim of the study was to assess the value of cardiac computed tomography (CCT) for the diagnosis of LVNC. METHODS: In this prospective controlled study, segmental analysis of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and prospective ECG-triggered CCT was performed in 17 patients with LVNC and 19 healthy controls. In TTE maximal NC and C thickness was measured at enddiastole and endsystole in the segment with most prominent trabeculation in short axis views. In CCT, maximal segmental NC and C thickness was measured during diastole, and NC:C ratio was determined. Spearman’s correlation coefficient and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated. RESULTS: The median [IQR] radiation dose was 1.3[1.2–1.5]mSv. The CCT thickness of the C layer was significantly lower in patients with LVNC as compared to controls in the inferolateral, midventricular, lateral-, inferior-, and septal-apical segments. The CCT NC:C ratio differed significantly between LVNC and controls in the inferior-midventricular and all the apical segments. NC:C ratio correlated significantly between TTE and CCT at enddiastole (σ = 0.8) and endsystole (σ = 0.9). Using a CCT NC:C ratio ≥1.8, all LVNC patients could be identified. CONCLUSION: LVNC can be diagnosed with ECG-triggered low-dose CCT and discriminated from normal individuals using a NC:C ratio of ≥1.8 in diastole. There is a very good correlation of NC:C ratio in TTE and CCT. |
---|