Cargando…

Current Evidence for Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring by Wearable Wireless Devices in Hospitalized Adults: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Continuous monitoring of vital signs by using wearable wireless devices may allow for timely detection of clinical deterioration in patients in general wards in comparison to detection by standard intermittent vital signs measurements. A large number of studies on many different wearable...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leenen, Jobbe P L, Leerentveld, Crista, van Dijk, Joris D, van Westreenen, Henderik L, Schoonhoven, Lisette, Patijn, Gijsbert A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7351263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32469323
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18636
_version_ 1783557416725512192
author Leenen, Jobbe P L
Leerentveld, Crista
van Dijk, Joris D
van Westreenen, Henderik L
Schoonhoven, Lisette
Patijn, Gijsbert A
author_facet Leenen, Jobbe P L
Leerentveld, Crista
van Dijk, Joris D
van Westreenen, Henderik L
Schoonhoven, Lisette
Patijn, Gijsbert A
author_sort Leenen, Jobbe P L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Continuous monitoring of vital signs by using wearable wireless devices may allow for timely detection of clinical deterioration in patients in general wards in comparison to detection by standard intermittent vital signs measurements. A large number of studies on many different wearable devices have been reported in recent years, but a systematic review is not yet available to date. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review for health care professionals regarding the current evidence about the validation, feasibility, clinical outcomes, and costs of wearable wireless devices for continuous monitoring of vital signs. METHODS: A systematic and comprehensive search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 2009 to September 2019 for studies that evaluated wearable wireless devices for continuous monitoring of vital signs in adults. Outcomes were structured by validation, feasibility, clinical outcomes, and costs. Risk of bias was determined by using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2nd edition, or quality of health economic studies tool. RESULTS: In this review, 27 studies evaluating 13 different wearable wireless devices were included. These studies predominantly evaluated the validation or the feasibility outcomes of these devices. Only a few studies reported the clinical outcomes with these devices and they did not report a significantly better clinical outcome than the standard tools used for measuring vital signs. Cost outcomes were not reported in any study. The quality of the included studies was predominantly rated as low or moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Wearable wireless continuous monitoring devices are mostly still in the clinical validation and feasibility testing phases. To date, there are no high quality large well-controlled studies of wearable wireless devices available that show a significant clinical benefit or cost-effectiveness. Such studies are needed to help health care professionals and administrators in their decision making regarding implementation of these devices on a large scale in clinical practice or in-home monitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7351263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73512632020-07-15 Current Evidence for Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring by Wearable Wireless Devices in Hospitalized Adults: Systematic Review Leenen, Jobbe P L Leerentveld, Crista van Dijk, Joris D van Westreenen, Henderik L Schoonhoven, Lisette Patijn, Gijsbert A J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Continuous monitoring of vital signs by using wearable wireless devices may allow for timely detection of clinical deterioration in patients in general wards in comparison to detection by standard intermittent vital signs measurements. A large number of studies on many different wearable devices have been reported in recent years, but a systematic review is not yet available to date. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review for health care professionals regarding the current evidence about the validation, feasibility, clinical outcomes, and costs of wearable wireless devices for continuous monitoring of vital signs. METHODS: A systematic and comprehensive search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 2009 to September 2019 for studies that evaluated wearable wireless devices for continuous monitoring of vital signs in adults. Outcomes were structured by validation, feasibility, clinical outcomes, and costs. Risk of bias was determined by using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2nd edition, or quality of health economic studies tool. RESULTS: In this review, 27 studies evaluating 13 different wearable wireless devices were included. These studies predominantly evaluated the validation or the feasibility outcomes of these devices. Only a few studies reported the clinical outcomes with these devices and they did not report a significantly better clinical outcome than the standard tools used for measuring vital signs. Cost outcomes were not reported in any study. The quality of the included studies was predominantly rated as low or moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Wearable wireless continuous monitoring devices are mostly still in the clinical validation and feasibility testing phases. To date, there are no high quality large well-controlled studies of wearable wireless devices available that show a significant clinical benefit or cost-effectiveness. Such studies are needed to help health care professionals and administrators in their decision making regarding implementation of these devices on a large scale in clinical practice or in-home monitoring. JMIR Publications 2020-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7351263/ /pubmed/32469323 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18636 Text en ©Jobbe PL Leenen, Crista Leerentveld, Joris D van Dijk, Henderik L van Westreenen, Lisette Schoonhoven, Gijsbert A Patijn. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 17.06.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Leenen, Jobbe P L
Leerentveld, Crista
van Dijk, Joris D
van Westreenen, Henderik L
Schoonhoven, Lisette
Patijn, Gijsbert A
Current Evidence for Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring by Wearable Wireless Devices in Hospitalized Adults: Systematic Review
title Current Evidence for Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring by Wearable Wireless Devices in Hospitalized Adults: Systematic Review
title_full Current Evidence for Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring by Wearable Wireless Devices in Hospitalized Adults: Systematic Review
title_fullStr Current Evidence for Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring by Wearable Wireless Devices in Hospitalized Adults: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Current Evidence for Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring by Wearable Wireless Devices in Hospitalized Adults: Systematic Review
title_short Current Evidence for Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring by Wearable Wireless Devices in Hospitalized Adults: Systematic Review
title_sort current evidence for continuous vital signs monitoring by wearable wireless devices in hospitalized adults: systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7351263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32469323
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18636
work_keys_str_mv AT leenenjobbepl currentevidenceforcontinuousvitalsignsmonitoringbywearablewirelessdevicesinhospitalizedadultssystematicreview
AT leerentveldcrista currentevidenceforcontinuousvitalsignsmonitoringbywearablewirelessdevicesinhospitalizedadultssystematicreview
AT vandijkjorisd currentevidenceforcontinuousvitalsignsmonitoringbywearablewirelessdevicesinhospitalizedadultssystematicreview
AT vanwestreenenhenderikl currentevidenceforcontinuousvitalsignsmonitoringbywearablewirelessdevicesinhospitalizedadultssystematicreview
AT schoonhovenlisette currentevidenceforcontinuousvitalsignsmonitoringbywearablewirelessdevicesinhospitalizedadultssystematicreview
AT patijngijsberta currentevidenceforcontinuousvitalsignsmonitoringbywearablewirelessdevicesinhospitalizedadultssystematicreview