Cargando…
Prospective randomised controlled trial using the REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) platform and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol
INTRODUCTION: Despite 40 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating preoperative oral antibiotics (OA) and mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) to reduce surgical site infection (SSI) rate following colon surgery, there has never been an RCT published comparing OA alone versus no preparation. O...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7351286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036866 |
_version_ | 1783557420749946880 |
---|---|
author | Apte, Sameer S Moloo, Husein Jeong, Ahwon Liu, Michelle Vandemeer, Lisa Suh, Kathryn Thavorn, Kednapa Fergusson, Dean A Clemons, Mark Auer, Rebecca C |
author_facet | Apte, Sameer S Moloo, Husein Jeong, Ahwon Liu, Michelle Vandemeer, Lisa Suh, Kathryn Thavorn, Kednapa Fergusson, Dean A Clemons, Mark Auer, Rebecca C |
author_sort | Apte, Sameer S |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Despite 40 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating preoperative oral antibiotics (OA) and mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) to reduce surgical site infection (SSI) rate following colon surgery, there has never been an RCT published comparing OA alone versus no preparation. Of the four possible regimens (OA alone, MBP alone, OA plus MBP and no preparation), randomised evidence is conflicting for studied groups. Furthermore, guidelines vary, with recommendations for OA alone, OA plus MBP or no preparation. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) has automated data collection for surgical patients. Similarly, the ‘REthinking Clinical Trials’ (REaCT) platform increases RCT enrolment by simplifying pragmatic trial design. In this novel RCT protocol, we combine REaCT and NSQIP to compare OA alone versus no preparation for SSI rate reduction in elective colon surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first published RCT protocol that leverages NSQIP for data collection. In our feasibility study, 67 of 74 eligible patients (90%) were enrolled and 63 of 67 (94%) were adherent to protocol. The ‘REaCT–NSQIP’ trial design has great potential to efficiently generate level I evidence for other perioperative interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: SSI rates following elective colorectal surgery after preoperative OA or no preparation will be compared. We predict 45% relative rate reduction of SSI, improvement in length of stay, reduced costs and increased quality of life, with similar antibiotic-related complications. Consent, using the ‘integrated consent model’, and randomisation on a mobile device are completed by the surgeon in a single clinical encounter. Data collection for the primary end point is automatic through NSQIP. Analysis of cost per weighted case, cost utility and quality-adjusted life years will be done. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by The Ontario Cancer Research Ethics Board. Results will be disseminated in surgical conferences and peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03663504; Pre-results, recruitment phase. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7351286 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73512862020-07-14 Prospective randomised controlled trial using the REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) platform and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol Apte, Sameer S Moloo, Husein Jeong, Ahwon Liu, Michelle Vandemeer, Lisa Suh, Kathryn Thavorn, Kednapa Fergusson, Dean A Clemons, Mark Auer, Rebecca C BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Despite 40 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating preoperative oral antibiotics (OA) and mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) to reduce surgical site infection (SSI) rate following colon surgery, there has never been an RCT published comparing OA alone versus no preparation. Of the four possible regimens (OA alone, MBP alone, OA plus MBP and no preparation), randomised evidence is conflicting for studied groups. Furthermore, guidelines vary, with recommendations for OA alone, OA plus MBP or no preparation. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) has automated data collection for surgical patients. Similarly, the ‘REthinking Clinical Trials’ (REaCT) platform increases RCT enrolment by simplifying pragmatic trial design. In this novel RCT protocol, we combine REaCT and NSQIP to compare OA alone versus no preparation for SSI rate reduction in elective colon surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first published RCT protocol that leverages NSQIP for data collection. In our feasibility study, 67 of 74 eligible patients (90%) were enrolled and 63 of 67 (94%) were adherent to protocol. The ‘REaCT–NSQIP’ trial design has great potential to efficiently generate level I evidence for other perioperative interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: SSI rates following elective colorectal surgery after preoperative OA or no preparation will be compared. We predict 45% relative rate reduction of SSI, improvement in length of stay, reduced costs and increased quality of life, with similar antibiotic-related complications. Consent, using the ‘integrated consent model’, and randomisation on a mobile device are completed by the surgeon in a single clinical encounter. Data collection for the primary end point is automatic through NSQIP. Analysis of cost per weighted case, cost utility and quality-adjusted life years will be done. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by The Ontario Cancer Research Ethics Board. Results will be disseminated in surgical conferences and peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03663504; Pre-results, recruitment phase. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7351286/ /pubmed/32647023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036866 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Apte, Sameer S Moloo, Husein Jeong, Ahwon Liu, Michelle Vandemeer, Lisa Suh, Kathryn Thavorn, Kednapa Fergusson, Dean A Clemons, Mark Auer, Rebecca C Prospective randomised controlled trial using the REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) platform and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol |
title | Prospective randomised controlled trial using the REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) platform and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol |
title_full | Prospective randomised controlled trial using the REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) platform and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol |
title_fullStr | Prospective randomised controlled trial using the REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) platform and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective randomised controlled trial using the REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) platform and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol |
title_short | Prospective randomised controlled trial using the REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) platform and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol |
title_sort | prospective randomised controlled trial using the rethinking clinical trials (react) platform and national surgical quality improvement program (nsqip) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7351286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036866 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aptesameers prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialusingtherethinkingclinicaltrialsreactplatformandnationalsurgicalqualityimprovementprogramnsqiptocomparenopreparationversuspreoperativeoralantibioticsaloneforsurgicalsiteinfectionratesinelectivecolonsurgeryaprotocol AT moloohusein prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialusingtherethinkingclinicaltrialsreactplatformandnationalsurgicalqualityimprovementprogramnsqiptocomparenopreparationversuspreoperativeoralantibioticsaloneforsurgicalsiteinfectionratesinelectivecolonsurgeryaprotocol AT jeongahwon prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialusingtherethinkingclinicaltrialsreactplatformandnationalsurgicalqualityimprovementprogramnsqiptocomparenopreparationversuspreoperativeoralantibioticsaloneforsurgicalsiteinfectionratesinelectivecolonsurgeryaprotocol AT liumichelle prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialusingtherethinkingclinicaltrialsreactplatformandnationalsurgicalqualityimprovementprogramnsqiptocomparenopreparationversuspreoperativeoralantibioticsaloneforsurgicalsiteinfectionratesinelectivecolonsurgeryaprotocol AT vandemeerlisa prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialusingtherethinkingclinicaltrialsreactplatformandnationalsurgicalqualityimprovementprogramnsqiptocomparenopreparationversuspreoperativeoralantibioticsaloneforsurgicalsiteinfectionratesinelectivecolonsurgeryaprotocol AT suhkathryn prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialusingtherethinkingclinicaltrialsreactplatformandnationalsurgicalqualityimprovementprogramnsqiptocomparenopreparationversuspreoperativeoralantibioticsaloneforsurgicalsiteinfectionratesinelectivecolonsurgeryaprotocol AT thavornkednapa prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialusingtherethinkingclinicaltrialsreactplatformandnationalsurgicalqualityimprovementprogramnsqiptocomparenopreparationversuspreoperativeoralantibioticsaloneforsurgicalsiteinfectionratesinelectivecolonsurgeryaprotocol AT fergussondeana prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialusingtherethinkingclinicaltrialsreactplatformandnationalsurgicalqualityimprovementprogramnsqiptocomparenopreparationversuspreoperativeoralantibioticsaloneforsurgicalsiteinfectionratesinelectivecolonsurgeryaprotocol AT clemonsmark prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialusingtherethinkingclinicaltrialsreactplatformandnationalsurgicalqualityimprovementprogramnsqiptocomparenopreparationversuspreoperativeoralantibioticsaloneforsurgicalsiteinfectionratesinelectivecolonsurgeryaprotocol AT auerrebeccac prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialusingtherethinkingclinicaltrialsreactplatformandnationalsurgicalqualityimprovementprogramnsqiptocomparenopreparationversuspreoperativeoralantibioticsaloneforsurgicalsiteinfectionratesinelectivecolonsurgeryaprotocol |