Cargando…

Prospective randomised controlled trial using the REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) platform and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol

INTRODUCTION: Despite 40 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating preoperative oral antibiotics (OA) and mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) to reduce surgical site infection (SSI) rate following colon surgery, there has never been an RCT published comparing OA alone versus no preparation. O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Apte, Sameer S, Moloo, Husein, Jeong, Ahwon, Liu, Michelle, Vandemeer, Lisa, Suh, Kathryn, Thavorn, Kednapa, Fergusson, Dean A, Clemons, Mark, Auer, Rebecca C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7351286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036866
_version_ 1783557420749946880
author Apte, Sameer S
Moloo, Husein
Jeong, Ahwon
Liu, Michelle
Vandemeer, Lisa
Suh, Kathryn
Thavorn, Kednapa
Fergusson, Dean A
Clemons, Mark
Auer, Rebecca C
author_facet Apte, Sameer S
Moloo, Husein
Jeong, Ahwon
Liu, Michelle
Vandemeer, Lisa
Suh, Kathryn
Thavorn, Kednapa
Fergusson, Dean A
Clemons, Mark
Auer, Rebecca C
author_sort Apte, Sameer S
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite 40 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating preoperative oral antibiotics (OA) and mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) to reduce surgical site infection (SSI) rate following colon surgery, there has never been an RCT published comparing OA alone versus no preparation. Of the four possible regimens (OA alone, MBP alone, OA plus MBP and no preparation), randomised evidence is conflicting for studied groups. Furthermore, guidelines vary, with recommendations for OA alone, OA plus MBP or no preparation. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) has automated data collection for surgical patients. Similarly, the ‘REthinking Clinical Trials’ (REaCT) platform increases RCT enrolment by simplifying pragmatic trial design. In this novel RCT protocol, we combine REaCT and NSQIP to compare OA alone versus no preparation for SSI rate reduction in elective colon surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first published RCT protocol that leverages NSQIP for data collection. In our feasibility study, 67 of 74 eligible patients (90%) were enrolled and 63 of 67 (94%) were adherent to protocol. The ‘REaCT–NSQIP’ trial design has great potential to efficiently generate level I evidence for other perioperative interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: SSI rates following elective colorectal surgery after preoperative OA or no preparation will be compared. We predict 45% relative rate reduction of SSI, improvement in length of stay, reduced costs and increased quality of life, with similar antibiotic-related complications. Consent, using the ‘integrated consent model’, and randomisation on a mobile device are completed by the surgeon in a single clinical encounter. Data collection for the primary end point is automatic through NSQIP. Analysis of cost per weighted case, cost utility and quality-adjusted life years will be done. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by The Ontario Cancer Research Ethics Board. Results will be disseminated in surgical conferences and peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03663504; Pre-results, recruitment phase.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7351286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73512862020-07-14 Prospective randomised controlled trial using the REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) platform and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol Apte, Sameer S Moloo, Husein Jeong, Ahwon Liu, Michelle Vandemeer, Lisa Suh, Kathryn Thavorn, Kednapa Fergusson, Dean A Clemons, Mark Auer, Rebecca C BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Despite 40 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating preoperative oral antibiotics (OA) and mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) to reduce surgical site infection (SSI) rate following colon surgery, there has never been an RCT published comparing OA alone versus no preparation. Of the four possible regimens (OA alone, MBP alone, OA plus MBP and no preparation), randomised evidence is conflicting for studied groups. Furthermore, guidelines vary, with recommendations for OA alone, OA plus MBP or no preparation. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) has automated data collection for surgical patients. Similarly, the ‘REthinking Clinical Trials’ (REaCT) platform increases RCT enrolment by simplifying pragmatic trial design. In this novel RCT protocol, we combine REaCT and NSQIP to compare OA alone versus no preparation for SSI rate reduction in elective colon surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first published RCT protocol that leverages NSQIP for data collection. In our feasibility study, 67 of 74 eligible patients (90%) were enrolled and 63 of 67 (94%) were adherent to protocol. The ‘REaCT–NSQIP’ trial design has great potential to efficiently generate level I evidence for other perioperative interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: SSI rates following elective colorectal surgery after preoperative OA or no preparation will be compared. We predict 45% relative rate reduction of SSI, improvement in length of stay, reduced costs and increased quality of life, with similar antibiotic-related complications. Consent, using the ‘integrated consent model’, and randomisation on a mobile device are completed by the surgeon in a single clinical encounter. Data collection for the primary end point is automatic through NSQIP. Analysis of cost per weighted case, cost utility and quality-adjusted life years will be done. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by The Ontario Cancer Research Ethics Board. Results will be disseminated in surgical conferences and peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03663504; Pre-results, recruitment phase. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7351286/ /pubmed/32647023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036866 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Apte, Sameer S
Moloo, Husein
Jeong, Ahwon
Liu, Michelle
Vandemeer, Lisa
Suh, Kathryn
Thavorn, Kednapa
Fergusson, Dean A
Clemons, Mark
Auer, Rebecca C
Prospective randomised controlled trial using the REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) platform and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol
title Prospective randomised controlled trial using the REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) platform and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol
title_full Prospective randomised controlled trial using the REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) platform and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol
title_fullStr Prospective randomised controlled trial using the REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) platform and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol
title_full_unstemmed Prospective randomised controlled trial using the REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) platform and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol
title_short Prospective randomised controlled trial using the REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) platform and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol
title_sort prospective randomised controlled trial using the rethinking clinical trials (react) platform and national surgical quality improvement program (nsqip) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7351286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036866
work_keys_str_mv AT aptesameers prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialusingtherethinkingclinicaltrialsreactplatformandnationalsurgicalqualityimprovementprogramnsqiptocomparenopreparationversuspreoperativeoralantibioticsaloneforsurgicalsiteinfectionratesinelectivecolonsurgeryaprotocol
AT moloohusein prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialusingtherethinkingclinicaltrialsreactplatformandnationalsurgicalqualityimprovementprogramnsqiptocomparenopreparationversuspreoperativeoralantibioticsaloneforsurgicalsiteinfectionratesinelectivecolonsurgeryaprotocol
AT jeongahwon prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialusingtherethinkingclinicaltrialsreactplatformandnationalsurgicalqualityimprovementprogramnsqiptocomparenopreparationversuspreoperativeoralantibioticsaloneforsurgicalsiteinfectionratesinelectivecolonsurgeryaprotocol
AT liumichelle prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialusingtherethinkingclinicaltrialsreactplatformandnationalsurgicalqualityimprovementprogramnsqiptocomparenopreparationversuspreoperativeoralantibioticsaloneforsurgicalsiteinfectionratesinelectivecolonsurgeryaprotocol
AT vandemeerlisa prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialusingtherethinkingclinicaltrialsreactplatformandnationalsurgicalqualityimprovementprogramnsqiptocomparenopreparationversuspreoperativeoralantibioticsaloneforsurgicalsiteinfectionratesinelectivecolonsurgeryaprotocol
AT suhkathryn prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialusingtherethinkingclinicaltrialsreactplatformandnationalsurgicalqualityimprovementprogramnsqiptocomparenopreparationversuspreoperativeoralantibioticsaloneforsurgicalsiteinfectionratesinelectivecolonsurgeryaprotocol
AT thavornkednapa prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialusingtherethinkingclinicaltrialsreactplatformandnationalsurgicalqualityimprovementprogramnsqiptocomparenopreparationversuspreoperativeoralantibioticsaloneforsurgicalsiteinfectionratesinelectivecolonsurgeryaprotocol
AT fergussondeana prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialusingtherethinkingclinicaltrialsreactplatformandnationalsurgicalqualityimprovementprogramnsqiptocomparenopreparationversuspreoperativeoralantibioticsaloneforsurgicalsiteinfectionratesinelectivecolonsurgeryaprotocol
AT clemonsmark prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialusingtherethinkingclinicaltrialsreactplatformandnationalsurgicalqualityimprovementprogramnsqiptocomparenopreparationversuspreoperativeoralantibioticsaloneforsurgicalsiteinfectionratesinelectivecolonsurgeryaprotocol
AT auerrebeccac prospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialusingtherethinkingclinicaltrialsreactplatformandnationalsurgicalqualityimprovementprogramnsqiptocomparenopreparationversuspreoperativeoralantibioticsaloneforsurgicalsiteinfectionratesinelectivecolonsurgeryaprotocol