Cargando…

Review of mobile applications for the detection and management of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Free mobile applications (apps) that use photoplethysmography (PPG) waveforms may extend atrial fibrillation (AF) detection to underserved populations, but they have not been rigorously evaluated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to systematically review and evaluate the quality,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turchioe, Meghan Reading, Jimenez, Victoria, Isaac, Samuel, Alshalabi, Munther, Slotwiner, David, Creber, Ruth Masterson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7351352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32656542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2020.02.005
_version_ 1783557426543329280
author Turchioe, Meghan Reading
Jimenez, Victoria
Isaac, Samuel
Alshalabi, Munther
Slotwiner, David
Creber, Ruth Masterson
author_facet Turchioe, Meghan Reading
Jimenez, Victoria
Isaac, Samuel
Alshalabi, Munther
Slotwiner, David
Creber, Ruth Masterson
author_sort Turchioe, Meghan Reading
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Free mobile applications (apps) that use photoplethysmography (PPG) waveforms may extend atrial fibrillation (AF) detection to underserved populations, but they have not been rigorously evaluated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to systematically review and evaluate the quality, functionality, and adherence to self-management behaviors of existing mobile apps for AF. METHODS: We systematically searched 3 app stores for apps that were free, available in English, and intended for use by patients to detect and manage AF. A minimum of 2 reviewers evaluated (1) app quality, using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS); (2) functionality using published criteria; and (3) features that support 4 self-management behaviors (including PPG waveform monitoring) identified using evidence-based guidelines. Interrater reliability between the reviewers was calculated. RESULTS: Of 12 included apps, 5 (42%) scored above average for quality (MARS score ≥3.0). App quality was highest for their ease of use, navigation, layout, and visual appeal (eg, functionality and aesthetics) and lowest for their behavioral change support and subjective impressions of quality. The most common app functionalities were capturing and graphically displaying user-entered data (n = 9 [75%]). Nearly all apps (n = 11 [92%]) supported PPG waveform monitoring, but only 2 (17%) supported all 4 self-management behaviors. Interrater reliability was high (0.75–0.83). CONCLUSION: The reviewed apps had wide variability in quality, functionality, and adherence to self-management behaviors. Given the accessibility of these apps to underserved populations and the tremendous potential they hold for improving AF detection and management, high priority should be given to improving app quality and functionality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7351352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73513522020-07-10 Review of mobile applications for the detection and management of atrial fibrillation Turchioe, Meghan Reading Jimenez, Victoria Isaac, Samuel Alshalabi, Munther Slotwiner, David Creber, Ruth Masterson Heart Rhythm O2 Clinical BACKGROUND: Free mobile applications (apps) that use photoplethysmography (PPG) waveforms may extend atrial fibrillation (AF) detection to underserved populations, but they have not been rigorously evaluated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to systematically review and evaluate the quality, functionality, and adherence to self-management behaviors of existing mobile apps for AF. METHODS: We systematically searched 3 app stores for apps that were free, available in English, and intended for use by patients to detect and manage AF. A minimum of 2 reviewers evaluated (1) app quality, using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS); (2) functionality using published criteria; and (3) features that support 4 self-management behaviors (including PPG waveform monitoring) identified using evidence-based guidelines. Interrater reliability between the reviewers was calculated. RESULTS: Of 12 included apps, 5 (42%) scored above average for quality (MARS score ≥3.0). App quality was highest for their ease of use, navigation, layout, and visual appeal (eg, functionality and aesthetics) and lowest for their behavioral change support and subjective impressions of quality. The most common app functionalities were capturing and graphically displaying user-entered data (n = 9 [75%]). Nearly all apps (n = 11 [92%]) supported PPG waveform monitoring, but only 2 (17%) supported all 4 self-management behaviors. Interrater reliability was high (0.75–0.83). CONCLUSION: The reviewed apps had wide variability in quality, functionality, and adherence to self-management behaviors. Given the accessibility of these apps to underserved populations and the tremendous potential they hold for improving AF detection and management, high priority should be given to improving app quality and functionality. Elsevier 2020-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7351352/ /pubmed/32656542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2020.02.005 Text en © 2020 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical
Turchioe, Meghan Reading
Jimenez, Victoria
Isaac, Samuel
Alshalabi, Munther
Slotwiner, David
Creber, Ruth Masterson
Review of mobile applications for the detection and management of atrial fibrillation
title Review of mobile applications for the detection and management of atrial fibrillation
title_full Review of mobile applications for the detection and management of atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr Review of mobile applications for the detection and management of atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Review of mobile applications for the detection and management of atrial fibrillation
title_short Review of mobile applications for the detection and management of atrial fibrillation
title_sort review of mobile applications for the detection and management of atrial fibrillation
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7351352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32656542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2020.02.005
work_keys_str_mv AT turchioemeghanreading reviewofmobileapplicationsforthedetectionandmanagementofatrialfibrillation
AT jimenezvictoria reviewofmobileapplicationsforthedetectionandmanagementofatrialfibrillation
AT isaacsamuel reviewofmobileapplicationsforthedetectionandmanagementofatrialfibrillation
AT alshalabimunther reviewofmobileapplicationsforthedetectionandmanagementofatrialfibrillation
AT slotwinerdavid reviewofmobileapplicationsforthedetectionandmanagementofatrialfibrillation
AT creberruthmasterson reviewofmobileapplicationsforthedetectionandmanagementofatrialfibrillation