Cargando…
Plant Microbiomes: Do Different Preservation Approaches and Primer Sets Alter Our Capacity to Assess Microbial Diversity and Community Composition?
The microbial communities associated with plants (the plant microbiome) play critical roles in regulating plant health and productivity. Because of this, in recent years, there have been significant increase in studies targeting the plant microbiome. Amplicon sequencing is widely used to investigate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7351510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32714361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00993 |
_version_ | 1783557453905920000 |
---|---|
author | Qiu, Zhiguang Wang, Juntao Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel Trivedi, Pankaj Egidi, Eleonora Chen, Yi-Min Zhang, Haiyang Singh, Brajesh K. |
author_facet | Qiu, Zhiguang Wang, Juntao Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel Trivedi, Pankaj Egidi, Eleonora Chen, Yi-Min Zhang, Haiyang Singh, Brajesh K. |
author_sort | Qiu, Zhiguang |
collection | PubMed |
description | The microbial communities associated with plants (the plant microbiome) play critical roles in regulating plant health and productivity. Because of this, in recent years, there have been significant increase in studies targeting the plant microbiome. Amplicon sequencing is widely used to investigate the plant microbiome and to develop sustainable microbial agricultural tools. However, performing large microbiome surveys at the regional and global scales pose several logistic challenges. One of these challenges is related with the preservation of plant materials for sequencing aiming to maintain the integrity of the original diversity and community composition of the plant microbiome. Another significant challenge involves the existence of multiple primer sets used in amplicon sequencing that, especially for bacterial communities, hampers the comparability of datasets across studies. Here, we aimed to examine the effect of different preservation approaches (snap freezing, fresh and kept on ice, and air drying) on the bacterial and fungal diversity and community composition on plant leaves, stems and roots from seven plant species from contrasting functional groups (e.g. C3, C4, N-Fixers, etc.). Another major challenge comes when comparing plant to soil microbiomes, as different primers sets are often used for plant vs. soil microbiomes. Thus, we also investigated if widely used 16S rRNA primer set (779F/1193R) for plant microbiome studies provides comparable data to those often used for soil microbiomes (341F/805R) using 86 soil samples. We found that the community composition and diversity of bacteria or fungi were robust to contrasting preservation methods. The primer sets often used for plants provided similar results to those often used for soil studies suggesting that simultaneous studies on plant and soil microbiomes are possible. Our findings provide novel evidence that preservation approaches do not significantly impact plant microbiome data interpretation and primer differences do not impact the treatment effect, which has significant implication for future large-scale and global surveys of plant microbiomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7351510 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73515102020-07-25 Plant Microbiomes: Do Different Preservation Approaches and Primer Sets Alter Our Capacity to Assess Microbial Diversity and Community Composition? Qiu, Zhiguang Wang, Juntao Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel Trivedi, Pankaj Egidi, Eleonora Chen, Yi-Min Zhang, Haiyang Singh, Brajesh K. Front Plant Sci Plant Science The microbial communities associated with plants (the plant microbiome) play critical roles in regulating plant health and productivity. Because of this, in recent years, there have been significant increase in studies targeting the plant microbiome. Amplicon sequencing is widely used to investigate the plant microbiome and to develop sustainable microbial agricultural tools. However, performing large microbiome surveys at the regional and global scales pose several logistic challenges. One of these challenges is related with the preservation of plant materials for sequencing aiming to maintain the integrity of the original diversity and community composition of the plant microbiome. Another significant challenge involves the existence of multiple primer sets used in amplicon sequencing that, especially for bacterial communities, hampers the comparability of datasets across studies. Here, we aimed to examine the effect of different preservation approaches (snap freezing, fresh and kept on ice, and air drying) on the bacterial and fungal diversity and community composition on plant leaves, stems and roots from seven plant species from contrasting functional groups (e.g. C3, C4, N-Fixers, etc.). Another major challenge comes when comparing plant to soil microbiomes, as different primers sets are often used for plant vs. soil microbiomes. Thus, we also investigated if widely used 16S rRNA primer set (779F/1193R) for plant microbiome studies provides comparable data to those often used for soil microbiomes (341F/805R) using 86 soil samples. We found that the community composition and diversity of bacteria or fungi were robust to contrasting preservation methods. The primer sets often used for plants provided similar results to those often used for soil studies suggesting that simultaneous studies on plant and soil microbiomes are possible. Our findings provide novel evidence that preservation approaches do not significantly impact plant microbiome data interpretation and primer differences do not impact the treatment effect, which has significant implication for future large-scale and global surveys of plant microbiomes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7351510/ /pubmed/32714361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00993 Text en Copyright © 2020 Qiu, Wang, Delgado-Baquerizo, Trivedi, Egidi, Chen, Zhang and Singh http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Qiu, Zhiguang Wang, Juntao Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel Trivedi, Pankaj Egidi, Eleonora Chen, Yi-Min Zhang, Haiyang Singh, Brajesh K. Plant Microbiomes: Do Different Preservation Approaches and Primer Sets Alter Our Capacity to Assess Microbial Diversity and Community Composition? |
title | Plant Microbiomes: Do Different Preservation Approaches and Primer Sets Alter Our Capacity to Assess Microbial Diversity and Community Composition? |
title_full | Plant Microbiomes: Do Different Preservation Approaches and Primer Sets Alter Our Capacity to Assess Microbial Diversity and Community Composition? |
title_fullStr | Plant Microbiomes: Do Different Preservation Approaches and Primer Sets Alter Our Capacity to Assess Microbial Diversity and Community Composition? |
title_full_unstemmed | Plant Microbiomes: Do Different Preservation Approaches and Primer Sets Alter Our Capacity to Assess Microbial Diversity and Community Composition? |
title_short | Plant Microbiomes: Do Different Preservation Approaches and Primer Sets Alter Our Capacity to Assess Microbial Diversity and Community Composition? |
title_sort | plant microbiomes: do different preservation approaches and primer sets alter our capacity to assess microbial diversity and community composition? |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7351510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32714361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00993 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qiuzhiguang plantmicrobiomesdodifferentpreservationapproachesandprimersetsalterourcapacitytoassessmicrobialdiversityandcommunitycomposition AT wangjuntao plantmicrobiomesdodifferentpreservationapproachesandprimersetsalterourcapacitytoassessmicrobialdiversityandcommunitycomposition AT delgadobaquerizomanuel plantmicrobiomesdodifferentpreservationapproachesandprimersetsalterourcapacitytoassessmicrobialdiversityandcommunitycomposition AT trivedipankaj plantmicrobiomesdodifferentpreservationapproachesandprimersetsalterourcapacitytoassessmicrobialdiversityandcommunitycomposition AT egidieleonora plantmicrobiomesdodifferentpreservationapproachesandprimersetsalterourcapacitytoassessmicrobialdiversityandcommunitycomposition AT chenyimin plantmicrobiomesdodifferentpreservationapproachesandprimersetsalterourcapacitytoassessmicrobialdiversityandcommunitycomposition AT zhanghaiyang plantmicrobiomesdodifferentpreservationapproachesandprimersetsalterourcapacitytoassessmicrobialdiversityandcommunitycomposition AT singhbrajeshk plantmicrobiomesdodifferentpreservationapproachesandprimersetsalterourcapacitytoassessmicrobialdiversityandcommunitycomposition |