Cargando…
Predicting in-season maize (Zea mays L.) yield potential using crop sensors and climatological data
The environment randomly influences nitrogen (N) response, demand, and optimum N rates. Field experiments were conducted at Lake Carl Blackwell (LCB) and Efaw Agronomy Research Station (Efaw) from 2015 to 2018 in Oklahoma, USA. Fourteen site years of data were used from two different trials, namely...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7351762/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32651438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68415-2 |
_version_ | 1783557508492689408 |
---|---|
author | Dhillon, Jagmandeep Aula, Lawrence Eickhoff, Elizabeth Raun, William |
author_facet | Dhillon, Jagmandeep Aula, Lawrence Eickhoff, Elizabeth Raun, William |
author_sort | Dhillon, Jagmandeep |
collection | PubMed |
description | The environment randomly influences nitrogen (N) response, demand, and optimum N rates. Field experiments were conducted at Lake Carl Blackwell (LCB) and Efaw Agronomy Research Station (Efaw) from 2015 to 2018 in Oklahoma, USA. Fourteen site years of data were used from two different trials, namely Regional Corn (Regional) and Optimum N rate (Optimum N). Three algorithms developed by Oklahoma State University (OSU) to predict yield potential were tested on both trials. Furthermore, three new models for predicting potential yield using optical crop sensors and climatological data were developed for maize in rain-fed conditions. The models were trained/built using Regional and were then validated/tested on the Optimum N trial. Out of three models, one model was developed using all of the Regional trial (combined model), and the other two were prepared from each location LCB and Efaw model. Of the three current algorithms; one worked best at predicting final grain yield at LCB location only. The coefficient of determination R(2) = 0.15 and 0.16 between actual grain yield and predicted grain yield was observed for Regional and Optimum N rate trials, respectively. The results further indicated that the new models were better at predicting final grain yield except for Efaw model (R(2) = 0.04) when tested on optimum N trial. Grain yield prediction for the combined model had an R(2) = 0.31. The best yield prediction was obtained at LCB with an R(2) = 0.52. Including climatological data significantly improved the ability to predict final grain yield along with using mid-season sensor data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7351762 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73517622020-07-14 Predicting in-season maize (Zea mays L.) yield potential using crop sensors and climatological data Dhillon, Jagmandeep Aula, Lawrence Eickhoff, Elizabeth Raun, William Sci Rep Article The environment randomly influences nitrogen (N) response, demand, and optimum N rates. Field experiments were conducted at Lake Carl Blackwell (LCB) and Efaw Agronomy Research Station (Efaw) from 2015 to 2018 in Oklahoma, USA. Fourteen site years of data were used from two different trials, namely Regional Corn (Regional) and Optimum N rate (Optimum N). Three algorithms developed by Oklahoma State University (OSU) to predict yield potential were tested on both trials. Furthermore, three new models for predicting potential yield using optical crop sensors and climatological data were developed for maize in rain-fed conditions. The models were trained/built using Regional and were then validated/tested on the Optimum N trial. Out of three models, one model was developed using all of the Regional trial (combined model), and the other two were prepared from each location LCB and Efaw model. Of the three current algorithms; one worked best at predicting final grain yield at LCB location only. The coefficient of determination R(2) = 0.15 and 0.16 between actual grain yield and predicted grain yield was observed for Regional and Optimum N rate trials, respectively. The results further indicated that the new models were better at predicting final grain yield except for Efaw model (R(2) = 0.04) when tested on optimum N trial. Grain yield prediction for the combined model had an R(2) = 0.31. The best yield prediction was obtained at LCB with an R(2) = 0.52. Including climatological data significantly improved the ability to predict final grain yield along with using mid-season sensor data. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7351762/ /pubmed/32651438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68415-2 Text en © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Dhillon, Jagmandeep Aula, Lawrence Eickhoff, Elizabeth Raun, William Predicting in-season maize (Zea mays L.) yield potential using crop sensors and climatological data |
title | Predicting in-season maize (Zea mays L.) yield potential using crop sensors and climatological data |
title_full | Predicting in-season maize (Zea mays L.) yield potential using crop sensors and climatological data |
title_fullStr | Predicting in-season maize (Zea mays L.) yield potential using crop sensors and climatological data |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting in-season maize (Zea mays L.) yield potential using crop sensors and climatological data |
title_short | Predicting in-season maize (Zea mays L.) yield potential using crop sensors and climatological data |
title_sort | predicting in-season maize (zea mays l.) yield potential using crop sensors and climatological data |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7351762/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32651438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68415-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dhillonjagmandeep predictinginseasonmaizezeamayslyieldpotentialusingcropsensorsandclimatologicaldata AT aulalawrence predictinginseasonmaizezeamayslyieldpotentialusingcropsensorsandclimatologicaldata AT eickhoffelizabeth predictinginseasonmaizezeamayslyieldpotentialusingcropsensorsandclimatologicaldata AT raunwilliam predictinginseasonmaizezeamayslyieldpotentialusingcropsensorsandclimatologicaldata |