Cargando…

Comparison of acute treatment with delayed-onset versus rapid-acting antidepressants on effort-related choice behaviour

RATIONALE: Reward-related impairments are common in major depressive disorder (MDD) and may contribute to the loss of interest in pleasurable activities. A novel approach to studying reward-related decision-making are effort-based tasks; however, direct comparisons between delayed-onset and rapid-ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griesius, Simonas, Mellor, Jack R, Robinson, Emma SJ
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7351874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32435818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-020-05541-9
_version_ 1783557533581967360
author Griesius, Simonas
Mellor, Jack R
Robinson, Emma SJ
author_facet Griesius, Simonas
Mellor, Jack R
Robinson, Emma SJ
author_sort Griesius, Simonas
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: Reward-related impairments are common in major depressive disorder (MDD) and may contribute to the loss of interest in pleasurable activities. A novel approach to studying reward-related decision-making are effort-based tasks; however, direct comparisons between delayed-onset and rapid-acting antidepressants (ADs) have not yet been carried out. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of conventional delayed-onset ADs versus rapid-acting ADs, ketamine and scopolamine, on effort-related choice behaviour. METHODS: Female Lister hooded rats were trained in an operant effort for reward task (EfRT) where animals choose between working for a high value-high effort reward and consuming low value-low effort chow. Using a within-subject study design, animals were then tested following acute treatment with different monoaminergic ADs, and the rapid-acting ADs ketamine or scopolamine. RESULTS: Consistent with previous findings, we found choice behaviour was sensitive to dopaminergic manipulations. We observed that pre-feeding altered choice behaviour and that the use of high or low value reward differentially affected behaviour. Monoamine re-uptake inhibitors and rapid-acting ADs resulted in similar, general patterns of reduced motivation without any evidence for specific effects, and we did not observe any clear differences between these classes of antidepressant. CONCLUSIONS: Motivational changes induced by dopaminergic manipulations and pre-feeding differentially affect effort choice behaviour. However, both conventional delayed-onset ADs and ketamine and scopolamine appear to have detrimental effects on motivation in this task at the higher doses tested without any evidence of specificity for effort-related choice behaviour, in contrast to their specificity in tasks which look at more cognitive aspects of reward processing. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00213-020-05541-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7351874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73518742020-07-14 Comparison of acute treatment with delayed-onset versus rapid-acting antidepressants on effort-related choice behaviour Griesius, Simonas Mellor, Jack R Robinson, Emma SJ Psychopharmacology (Berl) Original Investigation RATIONALE: Reward-related impairments are common in major depressive disorder (MDD) and may contribute to the loss of interest in pleasurable activities. A novel approach to studying reward-related decision-making are effort-based tasks; however, direct comparisons between delayed-onset and rapid-acting antidepressants (ADs) have not yet been carried out. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of conventional delayed-onset ADs versus rapid-acting ADs, ketamine and scopolamine, on effort-related choice behaviour. METHODS: Female Lister hooded rats were trained in an operant effort for reward task (EfRT) where animals choose between working for a high value-high effort reward and consuming low value-low effort chow. Using a within-subject study design, animals were then tested following acute treatment with different monoaminergic ADs, and the rapid-acting ADs ketamine or scopolamine. RESULTS: Consistent with previous findings, we found choice behaviour was sensitive to dopaminergic manipulations. We observed that pre-feeding altered choice behaviour and that the use of high or low value reward differentially affected behaviour. Monoamine re-uptake inhibitors and rapid-acting ADs resulted in similar, general patterns of reduced motivation without any evidence for specific effects, and we did not observe any clear differences between these classes of antidepressant. CONCLUSIONS: Motivational changes induced by dopaminergic manipulations and pre-feeding differentially affect effort choice behaviour. However, both conventional delayed-onset ADs and ketamine and scopolamine appear to have detrimental effects on motivation in this task at the higher doses tested without any evidence of specificity for effort-related choice behaviour, in contrast to their specificity in tasks which look at more cognitive aspects of reward processing. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00213-020-05541-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-20 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7351874/ /pubmed/32435818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-020-05541-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Griesius, Simonas
Mellor, Jack R
Robinson, Emma SJ
Comparison of acute treatment with delayed-onset versus rapid-acting antidepressants on effort-related choice behaviour
title Comparison of acute treatment with delayed-onset versus rapid-acting antidepressants on effort-related choice behaviour
title_full Comparison of acute treatment with delayed-onset versus rapid-acting antidepressants on effort-related choice behaviour
title_fullStr Comparison of acute treatment with delayed-onset versus rapid-acting antidepressants on effort-related choice behaviour
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of acute treatment with delayed-onset versus rapid-acting antidepressants on effort-related choice behaviour
title_short Comparison of acute treatment with delayed-onset versus rapid-acting antidepressants on effort-related choice behaviour
title_sort comparison of acute treatment with delayed-onset versus rapid-acting antidepressants on effort-related choice behaviour
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7351874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32435818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-020-05541-9
work_keys_str_mv AT griesiussimonas comparisonofacutetreatmentwithdelayedonsetversusrapidactingantidepressantsoneffortrelatedchoicebehaviour
AT mellorjackr comparisonofacutetreatmentwithdelayedonsetversusrapidactingantidepressantsoneffortrelatedchoicebehaviour
AT robinsonemmasj comparisonofacutetreatmentwithdelayedonsetversusrapidactingantidepressantsoneffortrelatedchoicebehaviour