Cargando…

Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients

BACKGROUND: There is no gold standard to diagnose septic shock-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The objective of our multicenter prospective study was to assess the performances of the different major scoring systems in terms of mortality prediction and DIC diagnosis. The JAAM-D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Helms, Julie, Severac, François, Merdji, Hamid, Clere-Jehl, Raphaël, François, Bruno, Mercier, Emmanuelle, Quenot, Jean-Pierre, Meziani, Ferhat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7352012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32651674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00704-5
_version_ 1783557545506373632
author Helms, Julie
Severac, François
Merdji, Hamid
Clere-Jehl, Raphaël
François, Bruno
Mercier, Emmanuelle
Quenot, Jean-Pierre
Meziani, Ferhat
author_facet Helms, Julie
Severac, François
Merdji, Hamid
Clere-Jehl, Raphaël
François, Bruno
Mercier, Emmanuelle
Quenot, Jean-Pierre
Meziani, Ferhat
author_sort Helms, Julie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is no gold standard to diagnose septic shock-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The objective of our multicenter prospective study was to assess the performances of the different major scoring systems in terms of mortality prediction and DIC diagnosis. The JAAM-DIC 2016 score, the ISTH overt-DIC 2001 score, the associations of sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) score with JAAM-DIC 2016 or ISTH overt-DIC scores were tested in patients within 12 h of their admission in ICU for septic shock (day 1) and at day 2. RESULTS: 582 patients were enrolled in the study. 182/567 (32.1%) were diagnosed with DIC according to ISTH overt-DIC score, and 193/561 (34.4%) according to JAAM-DIC score; 486/577 patients (84.2%) were diagnosed with a coagulopathy according to SIC score. A moderate concordance was observed between ISTH overt-DIC and JAAM-DIC [κ = 0.67 (0.60, 0.73), p < 0.001]. The delay of positivity of the scores for early DIC patients was not different between JAAM-DIC and ISTH overt-DIC scores. Although it was positive earlier, SIC score had worse diagnosis specificity, as 84.2% of the patients with septic shock were diagnosed with “coagulopathy”. The specificity of SIC score alone to predict mortality was very low [0.18 (0.15; 0.22)], compared to the ones of JAAM-DIC score [0.71 (0.67; 0.75)], and of ISTH overt-DIC score [0.76 (0.72; 0.80)], p < 0.001. The sensitivity of SIC score to predict mortality was 0.95 [0.89; 0.98], and the ones of JAAM-DIC score and ISTH overt-DIC score were 0.61 [0.50; 0.70] and 0.68 [0.58; 0.77], respectively. There was no benefit in sensitivity and specificity in combining SIC score to JAAM-DIC score or to ISTH overt-DIC score, compared to JAAM-DIC score or ISTH overt-DIC score alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the added value of SIC score alone or combined with other scores is limited, and that both JAAM-DIC score and ISTH overt-DIC score can be used in septic shock patients. Trial registration clinicaltrial; Trial registration number: NCT02391792; Date of registration: 18/03/2015; URL of trial registry record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02391792?term=meziani&draw=4&rank=1
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7352012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73520122020-07-14 Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients Helms, Julie Severac, François Merdji, Hamid Clere-Jehl, Raphaël François, Bruno Mercier, Emmanuelle Quenot, Jean-Pierre Meziani, Ferhat Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: There is no gold standard to diagnose septic shock-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The objective of our multicenter prospective study was to assess the performances of the different major scoring systems in terms of mortality prediction and DIC diagnosis. The JAAM-DIC 2016 score, the ISTH overt-DIC 2001 score, the associations of sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) score with JAAM-DIC 2016 or ISTH overt-DIC scores were tested in patients within 12 h of their admission in ICU for septic shock (day 1) and at day 2. RESULTS: 582 patients were enrolled in the study. 182/567 (32.1%) were diagnosed with DIC according to ISTH overt-DIC score, and 193/561 (34.4%) according to JAAM-DIC score; 486/577 patients (84.2%) were diagnosed with a coagulopathy according to SIC score. A moderate concordance was observed between ISTH overt-DIC and JAAM-DIC [κ = 0.67 (0.60, 0.73), p < 0.001]. The delay of positivity of the scores for early DIC patients was not different between JAAM-DIC and ISTH overt-DIC scores. Although it was positive earlier, SIC score had worse diagnosis specificity, as 84.2% of the patients with septic shock were diagnosed with “coagulopathy”. The specificity of SIC score alone to predict mortality was very low [0.18 (0.15; 0.22)], compared to the ones of JAAM-DIC score [0.71 (0.67; 0.75)], and of ISTH overt-DIC score [0.76 (0.72; 0.80)], p < 0.001. The sensitivity of SIC score to predict mortality was 0.95 [0.89; 0.98], and the ones of JAAM-DIC score and ISTH overt-DIC score were 0.61 [0.50; 0.70] and 0.68 [0.58; 0.77], respectively. There was no benefit in sensitivity and specificity in combining SIC score to JAAM-DIC score or to ISTH overt-DIC score, compared to JAAM-DIC score or ISTH overt-DIC score alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the added value of SIC score alone or combined with other scores is limited, and that both JAAM-DIC score and ISTH overt-DIC score can be used in septic shock patients. Trial registration clinicaltrial; Trial registration number: NCT02391792; Date of registration: 18/03/2015; URL of trial registry record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02391792?term=meziani&draw=4&rank=1 Springer International Publishing 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7352012/ /pubmed/32651674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00704-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Helms, Julie
Severac, François
Merdji, Hamid
Clere-Jehl, Raphaël
François, Bruno
Mercier, Emmanuelle
Quenot, Jean-Pierre
Meziani, Ferhat
Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients
title Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients
title_full Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients
title_fullStr Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients
title_full_unstemmed Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients
title_short Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients
title_sort performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7352012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32651674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00704-5
work_keys_str_mv AT helmsjulie performancesofdisseminatedintravascularcoagulationscoringsystemsinsepticshockpatients
AT severacfrancois performancesofdisseminatedintravascularcoagulationscoringsystemsinsepticshockpatients
AT merdjihamid performancesofdisseminatedintravascularcoagulationscoringsystemsinsepticshockpatients
AT clerejehlraphael performancesofdisseminatedintravascularcoagulationscoringsystemsinsepticshockpatients
AT francoisbruno performancesofdisseminatedintravascularcoagulationscoringsystemsinsepticshockpatients
AT mercieremmanuelle performancesofdisseminatedintravascularcoagulationscoringsystemsinsepticshockpatients
AT quenotjeanpierre performancesofdisseminatedintravascularcoagulationscoringsystemsinsepticshockpatients
AT mezianiferhat performancesofdisseminatedintravascularcoagulationscoringsystemsinsepticshockpatients
AT performancesofdisseminatedintravascularcoagulationscoringsystemsinsepticshockpatients