Cargando…
Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients
BACKGROUND: There is no gold standard to diagnose septic shock-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The objective of our multicenter prospective study was to assess the performances of the different major scoring systems in terms of mortality prediction and DIC diagnosis. The JAAM-D...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7352012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32651674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00704-5 |
_version_ | 1783557545506373632 |
---|---|
author | Helms, Julie Severac, François Merdji, Hamid Clere-Jehl, Raphaël François, Bruno Mercier, Emmanuelle Quenot, Jean-Pierre Meziani, Ferhat |
author_facet | Helms, Julie Severac, François Merdji, Hamid Clere-Jehl, Raphaël François, Bruno Mercier, Emmanuelle Quenot, Jean-Pierre Meziani, Ferhat |
author_sort | Helms, Julie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is no gold standard to diagnose septic shock-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The objective of our multicenter prospective study was to assess the performances of the different major scoring systems in terms of mortality prediction and DIC diagnosis. The JAAM-DIC 2016 score, the ISTH overt-DIC 2001 score, the associations of sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) score with JAAM-DIC 2016 or ISTH overt-DIC scores were tested in patients within 12 h of their admission in ICU for septic shock (day 1) and at day 2. RESULTS: 582 patients were enrolled in the study. 182/567 (32.1%) were diagnosed with DIC according to ISTH overt-DIC score, and 193/561 (34.4%) according to JAAM-DIC score; 486/577 patients (84.2%) were diagnosed with a coagulopathy according to SIC score. A moderate concordance was observed between ISTH overt-DIC and JAAM-DIC [κ = 0.67 (0.60, 0.73), p < 0.001]. The delay of positivity of the scores for early DIC patients was not different between JAAM-DIC and ISTH overt-DIC scores. Although it was positive earlier, SIC score had worse diagnosis specificity, as 84.2% of the patients with septic shock were diagnosed with “coagulopathy”. The specificity of SIC score alone to predict mortality was very low [0.18 (0.15; 0.22)], compared to the ones of JAAM-DIC score [0.71 (0.67; 0.75)], and of ISTH overt-DIC score [0.76 (0.72; 0.80)], p < 0.001. The sensitivity of SIC score to predict mortality was 0.95 [0.89; 0.98], and the ones of JAAM-DIC score and ISTH overt-DIC score were 0.61 [0.50; 0.70] and 0.68 [0.58; 0.77], respectively. There was no benefit in sensitivity and specificity in combining SIC score to JAAM-DIC score or to ISTH overt-DIC score, compared to JAAM-DIC score or ISTH overt-DIC score alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the added value of SIC score alone or combined with other scores is limited, and that both JAAM-DIC score and ISTH overt-DIC score can be used in septic shock patients. Trial registration clinicaltrial; Trial registration number: NCT02391792; Date of registration: 18/03/2015; URL of trial registry record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02391792?term=meziani&draw=4&rank=1 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7352012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73520122020-07-14 Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients Helms, Julie Severac, François Merdji, Hamid Clere-Jehl, Raphaël François, Bruno Mercier, Emmanuelle Quenot, Jean-Pierre Meziani, Ferhat Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: There is no gold standard to diagnose septic shock-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The objective of our multicenter prospective study was to assess the performances of the different major scoring systems in terms of mortality prediction and DIC diagnosis. The JAAM-DIC 2016 score, the ISTH overt-DIC 2001 score, the associations of sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) score with JAAM-DIC 2016 or ISTH overt-DIC scores were tested in patients within 12 h of their admission in ICU for septic shock (day 1) and at day 2. RESULTS: 582 patients were enrolled in the study. 182/567 (32.1%) were diagnosed with DIC according to ISTH overt-DIC score, and 193/561 (34.4%) according to JAAM-DIC score; 486/577 patients (84.2%) were diagnosed with a coagulopathy according to SIC score. A moderate concordance was observed between ISTH overt-DIC and JAAM-DIC [κ = 0.67 (0.60, 0.73), p < 0.001]. The delay of positivity of the scores for early DIC patients was not different between JAAM-DIC and ISTH overt-DIC scores. Although it was positive earlier, SIC score had worse diagnosis specificity, as 84.2% of the patients with septic shock were diagnosed with “coagulopathy”. The specificity of SIC score alone to predict mortality was very low [0.18 (0.15; 0.22)], compared to the ones of JAAM-DIC score [0.71 (0.67; 0.75)], and of ISTH overt-DIC score [0.76 (0.72; 0.80)], p < 0.001. The sensitivity of SIC score to predict mortality was 0.95 [0.89; 0.98], and the ones of JAAM-DIC score and ISTH overt-DIC score were 0.61 [0.50; 0.70] and 0.68 [0.58; 0.77], respectively. There was no benefit in sensitivity and specificity in combining SIC score to JAAM-DIC score or to ISTH overt-DIC score, compared to JAAM-DIC score or ISTH overt-DIC score alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the added value of SIC score alone or combined with other scores is limited, and that both JAAM-DIC score and ISTH overt-DIC score can be used in septic shock patients. Trial registration clinicaltrial; Trial registration number: NCT02391792; Date of registration: 18/03/2015; URL of trial registry record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02391792?term=meziani&draw=4&rank=1 Springer International Publishing 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7352012/ /pubmed/32651674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00704-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Helms, Julie Severac, François Merdji, Hamid Clere-Jehl, Raphaël François, Bruno Mercier, Emmanuelle Quenot, Jean-Pierre Meziani, Ferhat Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients |
title | Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients |
title_full | Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients |
title_fullStr | Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients |
title_short | Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients |
title_sort | performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7352012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32651674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00704-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT helmsjulie performancesofdisseminatedintravascularcoagulationscoringsystemsinsepticshockpatients AT severacfrancois performancesofdisseminatedintravascularcoagulationscoringsystemsinsepticshockpatients AT merdjihamid performancesofdisseminatedintravascularcoagulationscoringsystemsinsepticshockpatients AT clerejehlraphael performancesofdisseminatedintravascularcoagulationscoringsystemsinsepticshockpatients AT francoisbruno performancesofdisseminatedintravascularcoagulationscoringsystemsinsepticshockpatients AT mercieremmanuelle performancesofdisseminatedintravascularcoagulationscoringsystemsinsepticshockpatients AT quenotjeanpierre performancesofdisseminatedintravascularcoagulationscoringsystemsinsepticshockpatients AT mezianiferhat performancesofdisseminatedintravascularcoagulationscoringsystemsinsepticshockpatients AT performancesofdisseminatedintravascularcoagulationscoringsystemsinsepticshockpatients |